the good old days :)

#extradirty
Fai_Ryy
Show & Tell
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
𓃗

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

Jimmy Eat World

oozey mess

izzy's playlists!
d e v o n

bliss lane
Sade Olutola
hello vonnie

blake kathryn
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Keni
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Italy

seen from Brazil
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Burkina Faso
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@tacitusk1llwhore
the good old days :)
Coming back for a second from school killing me because people are truly maddening. If you play RDR (1 or 2!) and you claim the games and the messaging isn’t political…..you have the lowest level of media literacy that can be achieved by a human.
I’ve been increasingly seeing “he’s a cowboy! Not a politician!” In regards to people talking about the politics of the game and how they apply today. First, Arthur is not a cowboy. He is an outlaw. We tend to use the words interchangeably (I also do this! It’s fun!) especially because of the aesthetics and in the game it is used in a sarcastic manner a few times. But, it is important to differentiate especially when talking about the politics of RDR.
Even if he was a cowboy though, he wouldn’t have been called as such widely back then. Cowboy was a derogatory term, combining the words cow and boy to dehumanize freed Black men that were working cattle on their own or other ranches. Being a cowboy or rather for a white man a cowhand was also inherently political because it highlighted the inaccessibility to other, less backbreaking, more comfortable jobs for poor men and Black men.
Outlaws arose post-Civil War, while some were angry at the rebuilding on both sides. Others, like the VDL gang, were angry at exploitation and worked as almost “Robin Hood” figures to get back at large corporations and banks as retribution for their exploitation. Some were so loved that towns protected them. They also were often minorities (gay men, women, Black men, natives, immigrants) because the rigid structures of certain parts of society were harder to apply to the more wild parts of the country. All of it came from one thing: disagreement with oppressive or overly harsh government systems.
Arthur loved the West. You know what the West loved? Progress! In the West, women were allowed to vote in some states as early as the 1870s. Rigid structures didn’t apply because no one had time to, and more importantly, no one really cared. The Pinkertons, one of the main antagonists, were a for-hire government association. Known for busting unions and doing bidding for billionaires. They were picked because it highlights the government protecting the interests of the elite. They fight the army to show the corruption within it in regards to the natives and the people. John himself is killed after doing the government’s bidding!
The games and politics, their political messaging, you cannot separate. They go hand in hand with the franchise as much as the message of redemption does. People take the one time in the game Arthur says he doesn’t vote or engage in politics as law and not the overarching message of the game and what Sean says to him, which is that having no politics is politics.
doggy!
This is so cute I’m going to throw up oh my god.
the reason micah and dutch and the rest keep calling arthur stupid is because they're intimidated by his intelligence and don't want him to know btw
I haven’t posted on here in a bit just because of life stuff but I wanted to poke my head back in to just say fuck ice and fuck trump. That’s all. Hope yall have a good day! :)
rdr2 is so funny theres literally vampires and ufos and arthur literally dgaf
i cannot believe he tried to deny his fatherhood abigail shouldve killed him with a rock
Arthur is often very vocal about how much he disagrees with John disappearing on them, they bicker almost during every conversation they have during the first few chapters and tension is fairly high. They fight so much that Micah comments on it, saying that he knows Arthur has doubts about John, Arthur replies with "I have no doubts about John. I have known him for fifteen years."
Despite their fighting, despite all the anger and the annoyances, Arthur still trusts John. There is a bond between them, one that is stonger than blood, stronger than familiarity, stronger than almost everything. No matter what, Arthur believes in John, even if John pisses him off endlessly.
Does anyone else think it’s a little bit of a disservice to the narrative to consistently paint the romantic relationships portrayed in Red Dead as perfect? I’ve seen a lot of it with people romanticizing Mary and Arthur, John and Abigail, and fully ignoring the realistic parts of these relationships.
In my opinion, it’s why Red Dead works so well, why it feels so real. Because there is no perfection, there are ups and downs, messy feelings, and fights. John peaced tf out for a YEAR on Abigail and their baby, Mary and Arthur BROKE UP, and she married another man because of his inability to change or be there to support her. Abigail slaps John multiple times in the game, and Mary and Arthur have a full-blown argument in the street. I’m absolutely reading too much into it, but I’m also not talking about the people that draw cute fan art or make sweet edits occasionally. I mean the people who genuinely paint these relationships as perfect and tell others they’re wrong for not seeing them in that way. Anyway, that’s my lazy Ted talk for today.
PSA: There’s a Tumblr Scam Going Around
Second time this has happened to me—there’s a scam making the rounds on Tumblr, apparently hopping over from Discord and Steam.
The setup looks “official” but basically you’ll get an email or a message saying your account was reported for fraud/phishing or something similar. Sometimes it tells you to message a “Tumblr staff member” on Discord or email them back, and now there’s a new version that gives you a fake email instead.
That’s not the real Tumblr staff email. The only real one is [email protected].
Please, be extremely suspicious of anyone claiming to represent a website or company —especially if they’re saying your account is in danger and you “need to act fast.” That kind of panic is exactly how scammers trick people.
One last thing, if you ask a question and they ignore it or keep pushing you to “just do what they say,” that’s a bot or scammer.
Also a majority of these scammers are actually hacked accounts. Make sure the profile is at least up to date. The account itself is a victim upon being used for scamming.
If you do get one of these:
⟡ Don’t click anything
⟡ Don’t reply
⟡ Don’t message them on discord (doubt they even have a discord)
⟡ Just delete it and report it to Tumblr
Hey yall just wanted people to see this and be aware of a potential scam in the works or just a person out here reporting accounts associated with red dead Willy nilly for fraudulent behavior, genuinely have no idea what the fuck is wrong with people.
people who claim that arthur morgan would've been homophobic/transphobic like to conveniently forget, uhhh, pretty much his entire character
dude was in a gang (and was friendly) with black and native american people at a time where racism was still generally the rule rather than the exception. He enthusiastically participated in a women's suffrage protest! His whole fucking set of ideals was about standing up for freedom against the encroaching spread of 'civilised society,' where laws would discriminate against those they deemed 'unfit,' like arthur and his gang, like black and native american people, like women, and Obviously - though the modern terminology obviously wouldn't have existed at that time - like gay and trans people.
His whole thing was about living life as you saw fit, without The Man holding you down! Yeah sure he'd probably make some tasteless jokes here and there, he's certainly not a saint, but outright homophobic or transphobic? not a fucking chance!
I’ve been saying this forever but will never stop: the dudebros that play RDR2 cannot handle this character they deem a man, one that is powerful, to be feared, attractive, and in their eyes respectable, would absolutely despise the rhetoric they spew. So they attempt to change Arthur’s character in its entirety to fit their narrative on what a “man” believes and how he should behave.
They know deep down he wouldn’t be. I mean, he got Bill hair pomade (lube of the time for backdoor activities), and while he was uncomfortable in terms of giving it to him, he obviously knew what it was for and still did it. He didn’t bat an eye at the stranger mission Charles cross dressing, and when he kissed him, he didn’t beat the shit out of him or call him anything vulgar. He just told him to never do that again. We really think that the man who didn’t say ANYTHING when the siblings at the pig farm were talking about incest would comment if someone told him they were gay or trans? No! But you know what he would be pissed off about? The government telling you that you can or cannot be trans or that you can or cannot be married. Because he’s an OUTLAW, he is literally the epitome of small government but also helping those who need it.
Arthur loved the West, he loved the freedom, where it felt like anything was possible. You know who else historically loved the West? Freed slaves, gay couples, interracial couples, minorities of every kind—historically that is the one place people could go to live free. Women there got the right to vote decades before women in the East (as early as the 1850s in some places) because they were so untraditional and so rough and persistent. He LOVED it, so when people say Arthur would be homophobic and transphobic they’re just homophobic and transphobic and know this character they claim to love wouldn’t be, so they have to project their own weird ideologies onto him to make themselves feel better.
arthur's belongings🌾🧡
Not Red Dead related so sorry y’all but uh…someone just said literacy is dead as a reply to me when I stated that United States Supreme Court justices shouldn’t have lifetime terms because there’s more room for corruption and selfishness (aka a conservative Supreme Court, and a majority conservative Supreme Court because justices wait to die instead of stepping down…) and they especially shouldn’t have them because they’re not voted on by the people, so to fix that either they need to not have lifetime terms or they need to be voted on or both!
They then said I should read why we have them like that like I haven’t already….girl. NO ONE should have a lifetime term…EVER even the ones we vote for. Anyway, I hate when people call other people unintelligent for valid points, it’s a big pet peeve of mine, so when directed at me it really pisses me off. Am I crazy for having this opinion?
i love john but i sincerely have to fight the urge to push back any time someone insinuates he raised jack. abigail was a single mother from jack's birth to her death. john may have provided in protection and means but there is absolutely 0 indication he was ever prominently involved in the parenting aspect of jack's life and plenty of indications to suggest he wasn't present most of the time.
i grasp this is all he knows and likely how most fathers were but whenever i see sentiments about "john stepping up" or putting down arguments about who jack's father is by going "john raised him, jack is his." jack's his bc he is a carbon copy of john. but jack's proclamations about john not talking to him, spending time with him, running off and making underhanded remarks about his interests suggest that john has never truly been a present parent.
again, i love john! he did not raise that kid.
From all context clues from both games, John goes back and forth between being there to help, being around for Jack and disappearing for who knows how long and being emotionally distant. People seem to forget that even if John is there physically he isn’t exactly the most emotionally available person. He pulls Jack in only to push him away again.
John loves Jack but that doesn’t get across to Jack himself who in rdr1 says he knows John wishes he was different and “more of a man” and “more like him” to which John says thats not what he thinks at all and he never said that. And Jack says he may not of said it but thats what Jack thinks John feels. Through John’s actions thats what comes across. Jack makes several comments about how John starts teaching him one thing and then goes off somewhere leaving Jack to finish the learning all by himself.
Those aren’t the thoughts, feelings and words of a kid who had a present dad who raised him. Abigail raised Jack. She taught him what he knows, she gave him attention and love even when she was struggling. She was there from his birth all the way to her death.
John may love his son but he can’t get out of his own way to actually be there for his son.
Thats what makes rdr1 so so sad. John makes the promise that he will always be there for Jack and for once it truly genuinely seems like he’s going to stick to it. Even Jack starts believing so a little.
And then John dies.
Uuuuuugh these two make me physically ill
See but that description is not one of a "deadbeat dad". At least not in my opinion. A deadbeat doesn't care, is not present because they don't love their children more than themselves, or they don't try to be there for them. By your description John does love Jack and he tries over and over and fails to properly connect with his son. I'm not saying he's a perfect dad.
He isn't present but a huge point of the rdr series is how these people cannot seem to survive within society and its norms. Regardless of their good intentions now, they were criminals. John was a criminal. He was a wanted man, and then is used by the law and eventually killed despite wanting to be better and live better. Is that a situation in which someone is a perfect father?
John definitely makes some questionable choices because he is struggling to do what is right (right by his family, right by his morals, right by society) and it doesn't always add up. He and Jack are very different people. But again, in rdr we see John try. We see him tell Jack "he doesn't have to do anything he doesn't want to do", tries to protect Jack by making sure that he understands the world he lives in is dangerous (which proves to be very true) because regardless of John's choices, men like agent Milton or Dutch will use whatever means to get what they want.
So no John is not an emotionally available father or the best father by any means, but a deadbeat? That's ridiculous imo.
I stg do not @ me about this either. I'm just ranting.
you're on my post so i can @ you a little.
my tag about john being a deadbeat was tongue n cheek but since we brought it up.
what else do we call a man who abandons his child and the mother of his child for a year? what do we call him when he returns and spends several more years denying that kid is his and refuses to provide for him at all? because to ME that certainly sounds like it fits your initial description of a deadbeat. we forget, john's parenting resume didn't start at the end of rdr2, it started when his kid was born and he dicked around on him for 4 years and didn't tune in until jack got kidnapped.
i think i can call john a deadbeat. for fun.
John absolutely is a deadbeat even if not in the traditional sense. Even if he does come back and does stuff with Jack and then leaves…..he still leaves?
John is incredibly inconsistent. That’s the one thing he’s consistent in when it comes to Jack, it seems, which is just as damaging as a dad that isn’t there at all….you’re supposed to trust and rely on your parents. They’re supposed to be there for you no matter what.
So let’s recap John’s parenting history. Not only was he completely absent the first year of his life, he ignored him for the first four years of his life, to the point Jack himself noticed. Then he forced them to move constantly because he couldn’t act right, continuing to kill people and start shit wherever he went. Now that they have a home, he bounces in and out, then he dies, because at we see at the end of the second game he couldn’t put his wife and child above himself and his need for revenge for once.
He is the definition of a deadbeat. As much as I love him, you can absolutely be a deadbeat parent and be present sometimes. You can be a deadbeat and live in the same house as your child. It’s the dad who takes his kid out for ice cream once a month but then dips for three. Abigail is a married single parent, and I’ll stand by that forever.
Do people (cis white men) in fandoms not realize you can be both a slut for the characters and media literate?
Pewpew