Pick one of the following: “There is no such thing as ‘normal’ when it comes to human beings.” OR “Lying is always wrong: White lies and lies of omission are as immoral as outright lies.” Argue your view in two paragraphs on one of these topics. Use examples from the book and personal opinions to support your ideas.
“There is no such thing as ‘normal’ when it comes to human beings.”
I agree with Christopher when he says that nothing's normal about humans because that is how I would describe humans too. We complicate things, or oversimplify them, and then we have complicated emotions and thoughts and the way we behave is just so difficult to decipher. Even psychologists can't definitely state a fact about human behavior because it is that complicated. If you've ever read an article on human behavior then the psychologists who authored it mostly mentions that the results that they have acquired and conclusions that they have to come to are applicable to some and not all people. And most of the time to sound surer of what they're talking about they briefly mention that what they have come to discover may not be applicable to all people and then they later use phrases such as "most people" or "many people" instead of saying just "people" - in general. It is very hard to study human behavior and so in a big way it would be correct to say that humans are not normal. We are very different from each other even though we belong to the same species. Now I'm not trying to compare us to animals but looking at behavior and the way we interact there is a big difference between the two. This difference in behavior and interaction is highly commendable in some ways.
The statement that people are not normal is easily proven by the book because in my opinion one of the book's leading themes is also that people are very different and that their reactions are very different and then to Christopher that's all very abnormal because he’s not great on social interaction.
People who are arguing against this statement that people are not normal may say that people seem very abnormal to Christopher because he is not exactly normal himself and that's not his fault or anything but that's just the way it is. But if we look at it closely, it is actually easy to see that this statement is quite true - it's proven in real life and in the book.
It is shown that people are not normal in the book by how the author uses many situations where even though Christopher is trying to be nice people, people seem to completely look over that and think only from their point of view and react to the given situation in a way that is somehow very selfish of them. Especially people that closely deal with Christopher daily such as his father, his mother, some of his teachers, and his neighbors sometimes react in a way that is somehow inconsiderate of Christopher's condition. In this case it is safe to assume that they already know that Christopher suffers from Asperger’s Syndrome because they so closely deal with him in life, and even if it's not very daily Christopher is a part of their neighborhood or community and so it would kind of be obvious even if not completely known a fact that Christopher suffers from Asperger’s Syndrome.
All in all this statement that people are not normal is true and this is proven by the fact that we behave in very different ways in different situations and all of our reactions are different from other humans - the way we talk, the way we interact, etc. - everything is so different from another human and so we are not normal but even so this makes our symbiotic existence very commendable. And not being normal is a good thing because that makes us unique.