“still queen of the desert” YOU KNOW THATS FUCKING RIGHTTTT
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States
“still queen of the desert” YOU KNOW THATS FUCKING RIGHTTTT
Ace Attorney Best Case Tournament | Round 1, Part 17
TGAA2-3 | The Adventure of the Great Departed Soul
6-3 | Rite of Turnabout
These playoff games are too good the Superbowl is going to be like 52-3
Celebrating with the fans
The court said the language of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination, applies to discrimination based on sexual orientation and transgender status.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a landmark civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination, handing the movement for L.G.B.T. equality a stunning victory.
The vote was 6 to 3, with Justice Neil M. Gorsuch writing the majority opinion. He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
The case concerned Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employment discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex. The question for the justices was whether that last prohibition — discrimination “because of sex”— applies to many millions of gay and transgender workers.
The decision, covering two cases, was the court’s first on L.G.B.T. rights since the retirement in 2018 of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinions in all four of the court’s major gay rights decisions.
Those decisions were grounded in constitutional law. The new cases, by contrast, concerned statutory interpretation.
Lawyers for employers and the Trump administration argued that the common understanding of sex discrimination in 1964 was bias against women or men and did not encompass discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. If Congress wanted to protect gay and transgender workers, they said, it could pass a new law.
Lawyers for the workers responded that discrimination against employees based on sexual orientation or transgender status must as a matter of logic take account of sex.
(emphasis mine)
Should the Democrats pack the Supreme Court? Yes.
Will the Democrats pack the Supreme Court? Absolutely not.
Will the Republicans pack the Supreme Court next chance they get? Almost Certainly.
God, I love being in the High Ground Party™. I mean, don’t all of our Moral Victories™ just take the sting out of all the policy failures? We sure don’t want to alienate any Undecided Centrists™!
SCOTUS!! ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜