May 20, 2025
Luke is right, Bon Girono and Kash sold out.
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Switzerland
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Switzerland
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from China
Luke is right, Bon Girono and Kash sold out.
Same as Covid, another psycho power grab. Can you say police state?
The day before 9/11 happened, FEMA had operatives in New York City to help with the aid and clean up for the next day(September 11th). Tom kenney, a FEMA spokesperson, gave an interview to Dan Rather stating that FEMA was deployed to New York on Monday night, September 10th, to be ready to go into action 'the next day'.. on Tuesday morning, September 11th.
More Americans are doubting the official version of events surrounding 9/11, especially WTC 7, as new information is released.
September 11th, 2019
Today the event that defined the United States’ foreign policy in the 21st century, and heralded the destruction of whole countries, turns 18.
The events of September 11, 2001 remains etched into the memories of Americans and many others, as a collective tragedy that brought Americans together and brought as well a general resolve among them that those responsible be brought to justice.
While the events of that day did unite Americans in these ways for a time, the different trajectories of the official relative to the independent investigations into the September 11 attacks have often led to division in the years since 2001, with vicious attacks or outright dismissal being levied against the latter.
Yet, with 18 years having come and gone — and with the tireless efforts from victims’ families, first responders, scientists and engineers — the tide appears to be turning, as new evidence continues to emerge and calls for new investigations are made.
However, American corporate media has remained largely silent, preferring to ignore new developments that could derail the “official story” of one of the most iconic and devastating attacks to ever occur on American soil.
For instance, in late July, commissioners for a New York-area Fire Department, which responded to the attacks and lost one of their own that day, called for a new investigation into the events of September 11.
On July 24, the board of commissioners for the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which serves a population of around 30,000 near Queens, voted unanimously in their call for a new investigation into the attacks.
While the call for a new investigation from a NY Fire Department involved in the rescue effort would normally seem newsworthy to the media outlets who often rally Americans to “never forget”, the commissioners’ call for a new investigation was met with total silence from the mainstream media.
The likely reason for the dearth of coverage on an otherwise newsworthy vote was likely due to the fact that the resolution that called for the new investigation contained the following clause:
Whereas, the overwhelming evidence presented in said petition demonstrates beyond any doubt that pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries — not just airplanes and the ensuing fires — caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings, killing the vast majority of the victims who perished that day;”
In the post-9/11 world, those who have made such claims, no matter how well-grounded their claims may be, have often been derided and attacked as “conspiracy theorists” for questioning the official claims that the three World Trade Center buildings that collapsed on September 11 did so for any reason other than being struck by planes and from the resulting fires.
Yet, it is much more difficult to launch these same attacks against members of a fire department that lost a fireman on September 11 and many of whose members were involved with the rescue efforts of that day, some of whom still suffer from chronic illnesses as a result.
Rescue workers climb on piles of rubble at the World Trade Center in New York, Sept. 13, 2001. Beth A. Keiser | AP
Another likely reason that the media monolithically avoided coverage of the vote was out of concern that it would lead more fire departments to pass similar resolutions, which would make it more difficult for such news to avoid gaining national coverage.
Yet, Commissioner Christopher Gioia, who drafted and introduced the resolution, told those present at the meeting’s conclusion that getting all of the New York fire districts onboard was their plan anyway.
“We’re a tight-knit community and we never forget our fallen brothers and sisters. You better believe that when the entire fire service of New York State is on board, we will be an unstoppable force,” Gioia said.
“We were the first fire district to pass this resolution. We won’t be the last,” he added.
While questioning the official conclusions of the first federal investigation into 9/11 has been treated as taboo in the American media landscape for years, it is worth noting that even those who led the commission have said that the investigation was “set up to fail” from the start and that they were repeatedly misled and lied to by federal officials in relation to the events of that day.
For instance, the chair and vice-chair of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, wrote in their book Without Precedent that not only was the commission starved of funds and its powers of investigation oddly limited, but that they were obstructed and outright lied to by top Pentagon officials and officials with the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA).
They and other commissioners have outright said that the “official” report on the attacks is incomplete, flawed and unable to answer key questions about the terror attacks.
Despite the failure of American corporate media to report these facts, local legislative bodies in New York, beginning with the fire districts that lost loved ones and friends that day, are leading the way in the search for real answers that even those that wrote the “official story” say were deliberately kept from them.
Persuasive scientific evidence continues to roll in
Not long after the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District called for a new 9/11 investigation, a groundbreaking university study added even more weight to the commissioners’ call for a new look at the evidence regarding the collapse of three buildings at the World Trade Center complex.
While most Americans know full well that the twin towers collapsed on September 11, fewer are aware that a third building — World Trade Center Building 7 — also collapsed.
That collapse occurred seven hours after the twin towers came down, even though WTC 7, or “Building 7,” was never struck by a plane.
It was not until nearly two months after its collapse that reports revealed that the CIA had a “secret office” in WTC 7 and that, after the building’s destruction, “a special CIA team scoured the rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports stored in the station, either on paper or in computers.”
WTC 7 also housed offices for the Department of Defense, the Secret Service, the New York Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and the bank Salomon Brothers.
Though the official story regarding the collapse of WTC 7 cites “uncontrolled building fires” as leading to the building’s destruction, a majority of Americans who have seen the footage of the 47-story tower come down from four different angles overwhelmingly reject the official story, based on a new poll conducted by YouGov on behalf of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and released on Monday.
Source | Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
That poll found that 52 percent of those who saw the footage were either sure or suspected that the building’s fall was due to explosives and was a controlled demolition, with 27 percent saying they didn’t know what to make of the footage.
Only 21 percent of those polled agreed with the official story that the building collapsed due to fires alone.
Prior to seeing the footage, 36 percent of respondents said that they were unaware that a third building collapsed on September 11 and more than 67 percent were unable to name the building that had collapsed.
Ted Walter, Director of Strategy and Development for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, told MintPress that the lack of awareness about WTC 7 among the general public “goes to show that the mainstream media has completely failed to inform the American people about even the most basic facts related to 9/11.
On any other day in history, if a 47-story skyscraper fell into its footprint due to ‘office fires,’ everyone in the country would have heard about it.”
The fact that the media chose not to cover this, Walter asserted, shows that “the mainstream media and the political establishment live in an alternative universe and the rest of the American public is living in a different universe and responding to what they see in front of them,” as reflected by the results of the recent YouGov poll.
Another significant finding of the YouGov poll was that 48 percent of respondents supported, while only 15 percent opposed, a new investigation into the events of September 11.
This shows that not only was the Franklin Square Fire District’s recent call for a new investigation in line with American public opinion, but that viewing the footage of WTC 7’s collapse raises more questions than answers for many Americans, questions that were not adequately addressed by the official investigation of the 9/11 Commission.
The Americans who felt that the video footage of WTC 7’s collapse did not fit with the official narrative and appeared to show a controlled demolition now have more scientific evidence to fall back on after the release of a new university study found that the building came down not due to fire but from “the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
The extensive four-year study was conducted by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alaska and used complex computer models to determine if the building really was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely due to office fires.
The study, currently available as a draft, concluded that “uncontrolled building fires” did not lead the building to fall into its footprint — tumbling more than 100 feet at the rate of gravity free-fall for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second collapse — as has officially been claimed.
Instead, the study — authored by Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Feng Xiao and Dr. Zhili Quan — found that “fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] and private engineering firms that studied the collapse,” while also concluding “that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global [i.e., comprehensive] failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
This “near-simultaneous failure of every column” in WTC 7 strongly suggests that explosives were involved in its collapse, which is further supported by the statements made by Barry Jennings, the then-Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority.
Jennings told a reporter the day of the attack that he and Michael Hess, then-Corporation Counsel for New York City, had heard and seen explosions in WTC 7 several hours prior to its collapse and later repeated those claims to filmmaker Dylan Avery.
The first responders who helped rescue Jennings and Hess also claimed to have heard explosions in WTC 7.
Jennings died in 2008, two days prior the release of the official NIST report blaming WTC 7’s collapse on fires.
To date, no official cause of death for Jennings has been given.
Still “crazy” after all these years?
Eighteen years after the September 11 attacks, questioning the official government narrative of the events of those days still remains taboo for many, as merely asking questions or calling for a new investigation into one of the most important events in recent American history frequently results in derision and dismissal.
Yet, this 9/11 anniversary — with a new study demolishing the official narrative on WTC 7, with a new poll showing that more than half of Americans doubt the government narrative on WTC 7, and with firefighters who responded to 9/11 calling for a new investigation — is it still “crazy” to be skeptical of the official story?
Firefighters hose down the smoldering remains of 7 World Trade Center Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2001, in New York. Ryan Remiorz | AP
Even in years past, when asking difficult questions about September 11 was even more “off limits,” it was often first responders, survivors and victims’ families who had asked the most questions about what had really transpired that day and who have led the search for truth for nearly two decades — not wild-eyed “conspiracy theorists,” as many have claimed.
The only reason it remains taboo to ask questions about the official narrative, whose own authors admit that it is both flawed and incomplete, is that the dominant forces in the American media and the U.S. government have successfully convinced many Americans that doing so is not only dangerous but irrational and un-American.
However, as evidence continues to mount that the official narrative itself is the irrational narrative, it becomes ever more clear that the reason for this media campaign is to prevent legitimate questions about that day from receiving the scrutiny they deserve, even smearing victims’ families and ailing first responders to do so.
For too long, “Never Forget” has been nearly synonymous with “Never Question.”
Yet, failing to ask those questions — even when more Americans than ever now favor a new investigation and discount the official explanation for WTC 7’s collapse — is the ultimate injustice, not only to those who died in New York City on September 11, but those who have been killed in their names in the years that have followed.
Why the Government’s 9/11 Story is Bullshit
If it wasn’t a controlled demolition, How did the falling buildings defy the laws of physics? And why are there so many eye witnesses that heard internal explosions in the building?
Thousands of architects and engineers have spoken up against the US government’s official narrative with undeniable proof. We summarize their research in the style of award winning journalist James Corbett of the Corbett Report with ball-busting humor!
The last time I saw the World Trade center standing was on a trio My wife and I made to New York in 1983 to show my portfolio to some paperback book publishers. This is my wife with Trade center buildings in background. I think we were on the Empire state building when I took this photo. It has now been 17 years since American traitors and Israeli operatives brought them down in the most successful false flag attack in history. It is about time that the criminals that did it are brought to justice. I plan to attend a meeting tomorrow on the Unive4rsity of Pittsburgh campus with a group trying to educate people about the truth about the attacks. If you believe in peace and freedom join the 911 Truth movement! The facts are available for thiose willing to see them. A good start are the excellent books on the subject by Christopher Bollyn.
911
16 years ago an event happened that changed the world forever. Everyday I see reminders of 911. The most obvious reminders are every time I travel through an airport. Living in the Midwest, I don’t know anybody personally who died in the towers. However, my mother works for one of the airlines of the planes that hit the buildings. The airline industry suffered so much during this time. The world suffered. The economy went downhill.
Sadly, in 2002, an 18 year conspiracy theorist, Dylan Avery, wrote a play accusing the American government of staging the attacks. No doubt the Bush administration minimized the role of the Saudis in the attack and then proceeded to blame the wrong people and countries for 911. Many innocent people were murdered in Iraq and Afghanistan because of what a few evil men did in 2001. The American government continues to minimize the role Wahhabism while punishing innocent people because the USA ultimately cares more about Saudi oil than stopping terrorism. However, to suggest the American government intentionally staged an attack that cost trillions of dollars on a main financial center is ridiculous. To suggest the USA needed 911 to go to war in Iraq is more idiotic. SINCE WHEN has the American government EVER needed a legitimate excuse to invade another country? They just go and nobody stops them. The UN rarely blinks an eye. The USA didn’t need any excuse whatsoever to go to war and to think otherwise is foolish. The government here also could care less about getting popular support from its citizens. Seriously, only idiots would believe that the USA needed to pull on the heartstrings of people to create an excuse to go to war.
Also, if they were going to stage a fake attack, they could have staged something that was way cheaper and wouldn’t have cost trillions to repair. Seriously, it would have been enough to say an American ship was attacked. Also, somebody had said the owner of the Twin Towers had “terrorist insurance.” Wow, do people realize the twin towers were attacked before? Hence, why he had terrorist insurance. Also, if there really was some evil conspiracy, why would they be so sloppy in cleaning their tracks? Would he even need insurance? Couldn’t Bush or Halliburton just pay them off? The bottom line is most 911 “truth” arguments are easily debunked with simple logic. I probably should not call people idiots though because I can see why they might be brainwashed into believing such foolishness. Still, it’s really sad these lies persist. It’s very disrespectful to both the victims of 911 and victims of terrorist attacks around the world.
How Obama Was Groomed To Usher In A Shiite Caliphate Alex Jones is one of the main progenitor's of truth in the independent media's battle against the new world order.