New Post has been published on The Rakyat Post
New Post has been published on http://www.therakyatpost.com/columnists/2015/03/23/what-would-you-give-up-for-cheaper-flights/
What would you give up for cheaper flights?
I DON’T think I have met anyone who would not love to spend less on flight tickets, no matter how wealthy they are. Even budget travellers will splurge on expensive meals and luxury accommodation once in a while, but flights — we’re always hoping for a good deal.
According to a survey conducted not too long ago on 3,200 travellers from the Asia-Pacific region, 94% said they were willing to sacrifice some of the perks provided on flights in order to save money. Some of the things they wouldn’t mind doing away with include in-flight entertainment, meals and the ability to choose their seats.
In fact, 47% of travellers from countries like Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, India and Japan — who were polled as part of the Expedia 2015 Asia-Pacific Low Cost Carrier (LCC) Airline Index — said they would even be prepared to give up snacks and beverages if that would mean lower-priced flight tickets.
Here are a few things I’d like to suggest that airlines do away with in exchange for cheaper flight tickets.
Safety videos
There were no in-flight safety videos when I was growing up. All we had was a line of flight attendants holding up safety procedure cards and oxygen masks. Not very high-tech, but I’m sure airlines wouldn’t have to spend as much as they do on all those elaborate safety videos we see everywhere if they went back to using flight attendants.
Full meals (for flights under four hours)
A full in-flight meal service, especially on flights of under four hours, isn’t really necessary. Menus should be simplified on short flights to comprise only a light snack and soft drinks — only flights beyond four hours need to come with meals. We’ll be sitting down most of the time so we don’t need to eat a full meal with mains, salad and dessert on short flights.
In-flight shopping
I’ve always considered in-flight shopping as highly unnecessary. I’ve never bought anything on a plane and I’m not sure if that’s something too many passengers do very often. How much cheaper are the prices anyway, compared to what one would have to pay at the airport? Getting rid of in-flight shopping means that no costs will be incurred towards the shopping catalogue, including printing and photography costs, and models’ fees.
Blankets and pillows
This is a bit of a grey area because there are some of us who need blankets and pillows when we fly. I’m willing to do away with them and to rely on my own jacket if I get cold on a flight, but instead of getting rid of blankets and pillows completely or assuming that everyone needs them and charging for it, airlines should provide these items as an option, with a separate charge.
Snacks and drinks
Once again, another grey area. As I mentioned, nearly half of the travellers who were polled said they wouldn’t mind going without snacks and beverages in exchange for cheaper tickets, but some passengers will want at least a coffee. As long as there is an option to buy light food on board, I don’t think anyone will mind.
Your airline tickets could very well be your largest travel expense, so it isn’t surprising that such a large number of travellers prefer cheaper tickets.
What airlines need to do is to pay atte
ntion to the Expedia study and perhaps have a second look at the perks they provide.
Anis Ibrahim
*Anis also writes at Five Foot Traveller.
















