all i REALLY want out to see from an arthurian adaptation is for the creative team to pick their source text and stick to it like glue (unless they can expand it into something even weirder). fuck “historical accuracy”: what does the text say? if it doesn’t say anything, that’s free real estate (e. g. rather less physical description than could be expected, outside of “beautiful” and “enormous” and “armoured.”) but what that particular text says, goes. the point is in gluing the odd bits together as we go.
turning out something closer to a translation than an adaptation, creatively, the requisite footnotes on faithfulness and rigour included. everything has always been reread through the lens of the current moment—arguably that’s the point—and it’ll still happen no matter how hard anyone tries! but it’s the work of the trying-not-to, the preservation of the weird little already-culturally-mediated artifact that strikes me. you’re in your chosen corner of 12th century brittany…. why? why that one? if you’re changing it, what does it do?
and on the production end, it would probably turn into something a little closer to a table read? an actual play even? i’m picking through the malory now and the way they convey emotion is—different? not less intense but, descriptively, sort of… scripty? like you have the skeletons of these characters, their archetypes, their sealed fates, but the minutiae of inflection (or lack thereof) is largely left unaddressed? how much of someone’s read is informed by the years of pop culture surrounding a given figure? how much of it is just “well this is how i would understand that”
+ lowkey i actually like the idea of being Constrained by modern tv conventions like seasons/episodes and arcs (bc god knows the sources were NOT)? extra pressure to think about what’s True.