#autorship

[deennes]

VW Beetle Workshop

[lordkeeran]

In the end, I have to give credit to Gege.

The manga has had many highs and a few lows, with recent lows being more pronounced. Managing a large-scale battle is not easy, and that's understandable. However, with chapter 261, Gege did something increasingly rare in the world of entertainment, especially in Japan (to hell with editorial interference). He made an act of authorship.

Yes, fans will be disappointed, they’ll make noise, but the story doesn't need to go where the fans want it to; it needs to go where the author wants it to.

As I’ve said many times, Gojo had finished his narrative arc.

Gege made that clear on several occasions.

The airport scene, the flowers on the cover of the volume, and most importantly, the fact that Geto's body acted automatically to defend him before he was imprisoned (a sign that Geto had forgiven him and was waiting for him in the afterlife).

Gege has never hidden that the real protagonist was meant to be Yuuta, and with this latest act, he confirmed it once again.

There is nothing more important for an author than staying true to themselves.

Being sad or angry about an author's choice is part of being a reader and a fan, but one must accept and defend the author’s creative decisions.

The story is theirs, and they should have the freedom to tell it as they see fit. Want it to go differently? Want to change something?

There are fan fictions, parallel universes—become an author yourself!

What do you think?

Authorship is sacred, regardless of how I might feel about it

Authors should change their stories based on fans feedback and desires

I just want to see the outcome

Voting ended onMay 24, 2024

[umalagrimaqualquer]

Querido diário,

Minha psicologa me disse que uma das possibilidades de eu não conseguir manter as minhas amizades não é pelo fato de eu cansar delas, mas, eu canso de manter uma mascara, de interpretar tal papel, canso de ser quem eu não sou. Talvez a culpa seja minha, meu amigo.

UmaLagrimaQualquer

[gigantismo]

[soumariaduda]

Ela é simples, rapaz

O cara anterior levava ela em restaurantes caros: “A conta, por favor”, “245 reais, senhor” “Débito”, mas o que adiantava? Na frente das pessoas era um príncipe e no íntimo era um babaca. Gritava com ela e não a entendia. E ela só queria alguém que a entendesse. “Você não deve sair comigo com esse tipo de roupa”, “Se comporte na frente da minha família.”, cobranças e mais cobranças eram impostas todos os dias e ela cansou. Demorou pra confiar em outras pessoas. Mas ela tá conversando com você. Tá dando “moral”, que pelo que ela acredita, moral não precisa ser dada não, moral é pra quem tem! E você tem. Talvez você não tenha 245 reais pra gastar toda noite com ela. E nem precisa. Ela gosta da simplicidade. Leva ela pra comer um espetinho com vinagrete ou um pastelzão de queijo com caldo de cana!! Ela vai gostar. Ela não ama seu dinheiro. Ela gosta mesmo é de você e de respeito. E eu quero te dizer que: Se você tratar ela bem, como ela merece, vai que é tua!

[mordeeep]

Fonte: mordeeep

[fascinadeira]

<3

[tradutora]

Technique used to identify autorship: not traditional editorial insight, but computational analysis (...) With mutual influence muddying the picture, how can computers tell the difference between Marlowe, Shakespeare, and Marlowe and Shakespeare drawing on one another? According to the editors of the “New Oxford”, the answer lies in “function words”. These are words like “to” or “a” that supply the grammatical mechanics of a sentence. The theory goes that all writers unconsciously use these words in distinctive ways. (...) As a result, function words supposedly betray a writer’s identity, even when they’re trying to write like someone else. By analysing how a writer uses function words, computers can ostensibly identify their unique linguistic fingerprint.

The Economist (Why literature is the ultimate big data challenge)

@linguisten @allthingslinguistic