"We are watching maybe the biggest example of why capitalism doesn't work and why these billionaires are actually often the least deserving people you know."
-Brennan Lee Mulligan

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from Guatemala
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Czechia
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
"We are watching maybe the biggest example of why capitalism doesn't work and why these billionaires are actually often the least deserving people you know."
-Brennan Lee Mulligan
Air quality in Michigan via Gander Newsroom
Unfinished (monument to the Unknown Bureaucrat, by M. Tomasson, 1994) - Reykjavik, 2020
Trump may be a bull in a china shop, but at least he's no bystander or bureaucrat.
SOME OF THOSE THAT WORK FORCES.
ARE THE SAME THAT BURN CROSSES.
Keep watching, keep learning, keep speaking about the crimes against humanity committed by the world's wealthy elite. Just because you sleep comfortably does not make you innocent. The powerful and plentiful of the EU and North America fund the crises in Palestine, in Congo, and in Sudan.
Do NOT desensitise yourself to atrocities committed around the globe, do NOT over-consume traumatic and disturbing materials of human suffering, do NOT stop at reblogging, and DO NOT DISENGAGE OR DROP-OUT. DO keep reading about the history, listen to the words spoken by the people on the ground and who are there, bring it up at the dinner table, normalise politics in the tearoom, spread kindness, wellness and be grateful for what you have.
VENTING
We had a nice bottle of rosé wine from New Zealand for dinner and it was quite pleasant. Out of curiosity I read the label at the back of the bottle and I read the following: "this bottle contains 7.4 standard drinks." The bottle is of course the standard 750ml wine bottle.
Now, people, in New Zealand and elsewhere, have been drinking wine from 750ml wine bottles forever and they know approrximately how many glasses of wine to expect from that bottle, the number of glasses depending on their habits, on their winre glasses, etc.
My questions were then :
who thought that it was necessary to have such a mention on a wine bottle level?
who thought that it was necessary to define a standard drink?
who decided that ti was worth making the effort of doing this?
how was this standard drink determined? By a survey of NZ wine drinkers? By an scientific study based on a standard size of wine glass? Did this require another study or survey?
how much did this all cost and how many people are employed doing that sort of thing?
did anybody ever read that label except for me?
how much did NZ citizens pay in additional taxes to have such an information and standard produced that they do not need?
how pedantic can you be for specifying that, instead of a standard drink being estimated to be 100ml, you should specify that a standard drink is in fact 101.35135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135135ml?
what politician or citizen can think that a public good has been produced by having this mention produced and inserted by law or regulation on the label of a bottle of wine?
who evaluated that doing all this had generated any benefit for the NZ citizens?