seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Iraq

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1
Schizoposting time!
"The CCRU does not exist, has never existed, and will never exist." All the textual and multimedia output of the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) is marked by this epigraph. Supposedly stated by the University of Warwick, it encapsulates all the aspects that articulate the CCRU's theoretical and practical activity: the intimate union between theory and fiction, self-referentiality, and the paradoxes that emerge when humans attempt to experience the radically anti-human.
"El CCRU no existe, nunca ha existido y nunca existirá". Toda la producción textual y multimedia de la Unidad de Investigación de Cultura Cibernética (CCRU por sus siglas en inglés) está marcada por este epígrafe. Supuestamente afirmado por la Universidad de Warwick, condensa todos los aspectos que articulan la actividad teórica y práctica del CCRU: la íntima unión entre teoría y ficción, la autorreferencialidad y las paradojas que emergen cuando el humano trata de experimentar lo radicalmente antihumano.
Well, by gods, here it is:
On July 1st, Nick Land appeared as a guest on a YouTube channel The Dangerous Maybe, to be interviewed by hosts Michael Downs and Bryan Nanc
My attempt at a theory of how Nick Land came to the side of AOE (the Right Hand Path); or, rather, how his current alignment with the AOE makes sense with his current neoreactionary politics.