I would love to conduct a study on traditional gender roles, customer service practices, learned helplessness, and engineered obsolescence.
Because the exact same instinct in a man who refuse to eat other people's cooking because he knows how to cook compels him to build his own computer and repels him from Apple products... But also makes him attracted to a woman who "needs" him for things like fixing up the family car. It becomes a lose-lose scenario for these men because they don't want businesses "to talk down to them" but they use the exact same behavior with people in their lives because they want to be trusted to be knowledgeable and helpful.
One group of people want self-sufficiency as consumers and see businesses that teach as well as sell as being more respectful, whereas the other group of people consider "making things simple to be a mark of genius" and encourage simplicity at the expense of the consumer understanding the process because it's hidden, neatly, behind a single panel.
So then on the other hand, many women will desire simplicity and not consider it condescending at all, but then we'll put their foot down in social situations and consider the same simplicity childish and condescending.
The best example right off the top of my head is business suits. Working women have been wearing business suits for over 50 years now, and yet the communication and industry behind it has remained very, very simplified and women have to use "Are you an hourglass, carrot, ruler, or apple" language to describe the same clothing that a man is taught to simply get measurements for. Women have resented and resisted adopting the precise and individualistic and detailed methodology of men's suits... While also starting a civil rights issue around the idea of their bodies being categorized, because they also resent the simplification... It's a lose-lose scenario!
So, what makes a man or woman attracted to either simplification or preciseness as a consumer, but then repelled by it in social settings?