[DEATHLOK #20: (CYBER WAR: PART 4) | 1993]
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Norway
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Sweden
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
[DEATHLOK #20: (CYBER WAR: PART 4) | 1993]
Anonymous has used their ability to hack Russian TV. They are showing what's really going on in the war.
Here
Russia's hybrid warfare: desinformation and press control
So usually, I'm too lazy and just reblog. But I didn't find anything satisfying on just how malevolent and genius Putin's communication is. AND IT MATTERS IN THIS CRISIS TOO. Putin is an expert at hybrid warfare. He employs both traditional war (army) as cyber warfare tto reach his goals
While Ukraine is currently being invaded, the troubles are far from over once the active combat is done. I'm just seeing all my (Master in Diplomacy and International Relationships) classes come to life in how he plays both the people within and outside Russia.
It has been predicted for years that Putin's investments in fake news, artificial intelligence, bots and other desinformation tools, would be used by him during conflicts like these. And it's insidious precisely because we in the West do not see this fake news. That news is angled only at the people at the Russian border to convince them to join Putin's and Russia's side so that, when Putin barges in to protect "these independent sovereign territories" they will hold referendums to join Russia, just like Crimea did. Putin has a long history of being interested in certain areas of nearby countries.
Okay okay, time for the deeds.
RUSSIA WARNS SATELLITE HACK COULD BE ‘ACT OF WAR’
RUSSIA has warned that hacking its satellites is an act of war after the country's space agency was reportedly hit by a cyberattack.
Yesterday hacker group Anonymous claimed it had shutdown Roscosmos so that officials have "no more control over their spy satellites."
Russian space chief Dmitry Rogozin has denied that the agency was breached, but issued a chilling message to anyone who might attempt to do so.
"I want to warn everyone who tries to do it that it is essentially a crime, which should be toughly punished," he told Russian media.
"Because disabling the satellite group of any country is generally a casus belli, that is, a reason to go to war.
"And we will be looking for those who organised it.
"We will send all necessary materials to the Federal Security Service, the Investigative Committee, and the Prosecutor General's Office for relevant criminal cases to be opened."
Guerra Informatica: obiettivi dell’hybrid warfare le infrastrutture critiche
Andrea Biraghi 29, 03, 2021 - Cyber Security.
Mentre la guerra informatica continua ad essere combattuta tra gli stati, continua anche la corsa della sicurezza informatica che ad oggi deve essere ritenuta esponsabilità del paese nel suo complesso e non solo relativa ad un individuo o ad un’organizzazione.
Nel corso degli anni, abbiamo assistito a un’escalation nella serie di hacking sui servizi sanitari, le reti elettriche, le centrali nucleari e la nostra privacy. Le minacce non vengono solo da Cina, Russia, Corea del Nord o qualsiasi attore statale o non statale con l’intento di destabilizzare un paese. Le minacce informatiche, in continua evoluzione, mettono così anche a rischio le infrastrutture critiche che sono in definitiva veri e propri sistemi strategici, essenziali per una nazione.
…le vere vittime sono imprese, organizzazioni e cittadini, che ne subiscono gli effetti. Allo stesso tempo, si assottiglia la linea di separazione tra azioni statali e “semplice” criminalità informatica.
Ma la maggiro parte dei cyber attacchi sono diretti alle infrastrutture critiche e il cyber spazio ha assunto un ruolo primario nei nuovi scenari geopolitici internazionali. Quali sono i nuiovi scenari? Nemici da remoto che utilizzano armi come virus informatici, malware e programmi che alterano l’operabilità di un sistema o avviano uno spegnimento completo del sistema. Gli attacchi informatici saranno il nuovo campo di battaglia – invisibile, invisibile e imprevedibile – dove hacker di varie nazioni competeranno per distruggere economie e vite.
Continua a leggere: Guerra Informatica: obiettivi dell’hybrid warfare le infrastrutture critiche
Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Election
Chavistas flood Caracas in mega anti-imperialist rally, March 9, 2019
By Cheryl LaBash
On Sunday morning March 10, electricity was largely restored in Venezuela after the sabotage of its power grid that began on March 7. Even in the midst of the crisis, Bolivarian Venezuelans with their elected president, Nicolás Maduro Moro, mobilized in a massive united anti-imperialist demonstration on March 9.
The U.S. government bears as much responsibility for these new hardships in Venezuela as was caused by its targeted bombing of Iraqi electric infrastructure in 1991.
Of course, no U.S. Air Force bombs rained down on Venezuela’s Guri hydroelectric complex. None were needed to inflict more economic suffering on the Bolivarian people. Equally devastating and lethal methods are now in imperialism’s toolbox, including cyber weapons and the cruel reality hidden behind the innocuous and nonthreatening term “sanctions.”
The Cyber War is not real .... yet
This post is derived from a few of the pieces of work I have put out in other channels recently. The work comes partly from realisation and party from frustration that a message is being broadcast which is essentially not entirely true. Increasingly in the last 2 years there has been mountains of content produced from a range of knowledgeable people either in the industry or close to the industry to totally uninformed outsiders about cyber war and whats happening right now. From everything I have read I can say without doubt 95% is fear mongering that the cyber war is going on right now all around us. This is false, I'll now elaborate why this is false now as many people will jump to tell you the opposite.
There is no clear definition. The term cyber war is fuzzy and deliberately ethereal. Nobody knows what it means but it makes it easier to get clicks on news articles and sell books. Because it’s fuzzy its also super easy for anybody with a little knowledge more than the average person to become a cyber war pundit. If your reading this please don’t become a cyber war pundit.
Cyber weapons are not the same as traditional weapons. A cyber weapon is not the same as a regular weapon. When somebody fires a missile and it reaches its target it blows up causing mass devastation. A cyber weapon can cause mass devastation luckily at the time of writing there has been no major incident which has caused mass death but there have been many notable examples which caused frustrating sabotage for those targeted. Where a cyber weapon is different from a missile is that the victim of the attack can find the weapon take it apart, understand it and then potentially fire it back at you. So if you are not careful you could potentially be giving your enemy a way to fire back at you or your allies in the future. I don’t think this has ever happened before in the history of the warfare.
Actions that are pegged as cyber war are really espionage and sabotage. Many of the examples quotes as “classic” examples of cyber war such as stuxnet are really espionage and sabotage efforts. Espionage and sabotage definitely take place in war however they are not enough to encompass the entire concept of war. These activities are more James Bond than Band of Brothers.
The attribution problem. One of the hardest things in cyber security is attribution it’s often very hard to tell between whats real and what evidence has been manufactured even when you are an expert. Actions that usually spark wars require very clear attribution. With malicious cyber attacks most go past without any attribution ever occurring.
A never ending conflict. Cyber war like many other “the war on <insert concept>” is large and fuzzy as mentioned earlier this nature makes it perfect for certain people and groups to take advantage of. That means it also can be used as a cash cow. asa . As a general rule if a concept is vague it needs to be refined down, we need to do this with the term cyber war otherwise it will turn into another “the war on <insert concept>” that never seems to end or due to its nature it can never end successfully for everyone involved.
It’s the early days. Obviously the above can all change in an instant, I hope it doesn’t but its easier to be optimistic some days more than others. Think of these thoughts as a snapshot in time and something we should strive to preserve because like nuclear warfare if cyber war becomes real theres no going back, we can’t put the lid back on Pandora’s box.
Hope you found this useful! Feel free to leave a comment with your opinion on Cyber War.
Until Next time!
The Security Sleuth