𖠚 ✉︀
| Fresh belongs to @/loverofpiggies

#dc#dc comics#batman#dick grayson#bruce wayne#tim drake#batfamily#batfam#dc fanart
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Latvia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Egypt
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from United States
𖠚 ✉︀
| Fresh belongs to @/loverofpiggies
3 days to goooo
I just noticed this with a rewatch of LEZ and 02TB but Takeru's Digivice Phone changes color.
In LEZ, it's depicted as a light yellow that matches the color of his crest. In 02TB, it's depicted as a medium shade green that matches the color of his D-3. Even though you don't see it, Wikimon states that the phone still has the Crest of Hope on it and I think the same. In 02TB it also doesn't have the top corners cut out like you can see in LEZ so I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same on the bottom. There also doesn't look to be the two additional triangles below the main one with the crest and it looks to be white instead of the pain color of the case.
You only see Takeru's Digivice Phone in the very beginning of 02TB and it's a small detail but I like how they changed it.
I understand why they made it yellow, since the rest of the OG8's Digivice Phone's were all colored after their crests, but Takeru does have a D-3 and the phones are meant to act like Digivices while also being phones so I thought it made more sense for his to be the color of his D-3. Ken's Digivice Phone is also shown to be black like his D-3 with the rest of the 02 kids, and Hikari's wouldn't have changed but I still like the change. It would definitely allow his Crest of Hope to pop more.
Again, it's a small detail change and I don't really care what color it is, but I definitely prefer the green to the yellow. There is also a chance that it is just a phone case so Takeru could change them out depending on how he feels and I like that as well
He's never beating the "Jimin climbs JK like a tree" allegations
An Essay
:
The same molecule in your morning vitamin D supplement is the active ingredient in rat poison.
Not a similar compound. Not a chemical cousin. The exact same molecule: cholecalciferol. At 0.075% concentration, it kills rats. In your supplement bottle, it's supposed to make you healthier.
This should be a simple story of dosage – but the more I investigated, the stranger it became. The vitamin D in supplements isn't extracted from fish or produced by sunlight. It's manufactured from sheep's wool using benzene and chloroform in Chinese chemical factories. The same factories that produce industrial solvents.
Meanwhile, studies show vitamin D supplements reduce multiple sclerosis progression by 34%. They lower cancer mortality. They help ICU patients recover faster. How does rat poison mixed with industrial chemicals improve health outcomes?
This essay is my attempt to reconcile what shouldn't be reconcilable. To understand how we arrived at a place where medicine and poison share the same molecule, the same manufacturer, the same mechanism of action – but somehow produce opposite results.
What you're about to read might challenge everything you believe about supplements, nutrition, and how we decide what's "healthy." That's the point. Sometimes the most important questions are the ones that make us uncomfortable.
Ready?
One more thing: this isn't meant to frighten you. If you're taking vitamin D and feeling better, I'm not saying you're poisoning yourself. The truth is more complex - some people probably benefit, others might be harmed, and many are likely wasting money on unnecessary supplements. The goal is to help you make informed decisions, not to create panic.
Some people do have genuine, severe deficiencies that need medical attention. This essay isn't about them – it's about the rest of us being told we're all deficient based on questionable tests and ever-shifting standards.
1. The Paradox That Shouldn't Exist
Here's a puzzle that keeps me awake at night: Multiple studies claim vitamin D supplementation produces measurable health benefits. A 2025 trial in France reported that high-dose vitamin D reduced multiple sclerosis progression by 34%. A meta-analysis found 15% lower cancer mortality. ICU patients allegedly had better survival rates. These studies exist, complete with control groups and statistical analyses, circulating through the medical establishment's usual channels.
Same substance, different context: Rampage rat poison. Active ingredient: 0.075% cholecalciferol. That's vitamin D3. Not mixed with vitamin D3, not containing vitamin D3 as one of many ingredients. The only active ingredient that kills rats is the exact same molecule we're told to supplement for our health. The remaining 99.925%? Seeds and grain – rat food. The vitamin D is what makes it lethal.
Something doesn't add up here.
Now, I don't trust the medical publishing complex. After watching them gatekeep dissenting voices, rubber-stamp fraudulent studies during the pandemic, and memory-hole inconvenient data, I know they're captured by industrial medicine. But here's what makes this paradox interesting: even if these vitamin D studies are manipulated, even if the benefits are manufactured, even if the whole thing is pharmaceutical propaganda – we still have the other side of the equation. The rat poison. The safety data sheets. The "fatal if swallowed" warnings from the actual manufacturers.
Either we're witnessing one of the most successful examples of "the dose makes the poison" in human history, or we're missing something fundamental about what's actually happening when people swallow these supplements. Because when Merck's own safety documents classify their pharmaceutical-grade vitamin D3 as "Category 1 and 2 hazardous," I pay attention. Not because I trust Merck – but because liability lawyers make them document actual hazards.
This isn't a simple story of Big Pharma deception or natural health enlightenment. It's messier than that. More confusing. And I'm trying to figure out how both realities can exist simultaneously.
2. The Case Against - When the Evidence is Undeniable
Let me start with what Agent131711 gets absolutely right, because some of this evidence is impossible to dismiss.
The safety data sheets are damning. Not from some blogger's interpretation, but from Merck and Spectrum's own legal documentation for pharmaceutical-grade vitamin D3. "Fatal if swallowed." "Category 1 and 2 hazardous substance." "Not for use as food or drug." These aren't typos. These are legally required hazard classifications that companies must provide to protect themselves from liability. The same cholecalciferol molecule sold in your local pharmacy carries skull-and-crossbones pictograms in its industrial documentation.
Then there's the mechanism of death – identical in rats and humans. Cholecalciferol kills through hypercalcemia: calcium floods the bloodstream, calcifies soft tissues, damages kidneys, causes heart failure. When rats eat those poison pellets, this is how they die. When humans overdose on vitamin D, this is exactly what happens to them. Same molecule, same biological pathway, same organ damage. The only difference is the dose and the timeline.
Here's a paradox within the paradox: vitamin D supposedly helps us absorb calcium for strong bones, yet it kills through calcium overload. We're told the poison's mechanism of death is somehow also its mechanism of healing. How can flooding the body with calcium simultaneously strengthen bones and destroy organs? It's like claiming drowning prevents dehydration.
The mechanism gets worse when you understand the magnesium connection. Excess vitamin D doesn't just flood your body with calcium -- it actively depletes magnesium in the process. The hormone form of D signals your intestines to preferentially absorb calcium over magnesium. Your kidneys need magnesium to dump the excess calcium, but the very substance causing the calcium overload is simultaneously blocking your ability to get the magnesium needed to fix it.
It's a biochemical trap: the more vitamin D you take to "fix" your deficiency, the more you deplete the magnesium that would protect you from its toxicity. Magnesium is anti-inflammatory; calcium is inflammatory. We're systematically tilting everyone's mineral balance toward inflammation while calling it preventive healthcare. Some practitioners have observed this and recommend topical magnesium to bypass the compromised intestinal absorption -- essentially admitting that oral vitamin D supplementation breaks normal mineral metabolism so badly that you need to absorb minerals through your skin to compensate.
The manufacturing process should give anyone pause. This isn't sunshine captured in a bottle. It's sheep's wool grease (lanolin) irradiated with UV light, then extracted using chloroform – a known carcinogen that the safety sheets warn "may damage the unborn child." Industrial chemistry masquerading as a vitamin. Whatever your body produces when sunlight hits your skin, this isn't it.
The conflation of all forms of vitamin D also deserves scrutiny. The cholecalciferol your skin produces from sunlight, the vitamin D2 from mushrooms, the synthetic D3 from supplements – Agent131711 treats them as interchangeable villains. But even Agent131711 admits being unable to find natural vitamin D isolated under a microscope, only synthetic versions. This suggests we might be dealing with different substances entirely, despite similar names.
Still, those rat poison labels don't lie. Quintox: 0.075% vitamin D3, 99.925% seeds. Agrid3: same ratio. TeraD3 BLOX: marketed as the only EPA-approved organic rodenticide, killing through vitamin D toxicity. These aren't obscure products – they're commercially available, professionally manufactured, and they work by exploiting vitamin D's toxicity at tiny concentrations.
The question isn't whether vitamin D3 can be toxic. It clearly can. The question is whether taking it at supplement doses is slowly building toward that same toxicity, just stretched over decades instead of days.
Where Agent131711's argument becomes more debatable is the dismissal of dose-response. "Poison is poison," they say, but this oversimplifies how biology works. The difference between rat poison concentration (0.075%) and typical supplement doses is often 1000-fold or more. Pharmacology exists as a discipline because dose-response relationships are real and measurable.
It's worth noting that vitamin D toxicity from supplementation at recommended doses is genuinely rare. The Endocrine Society reports that toxicity typically requires doses above 10,000 IU daily for months. Millions supplement daily without acute poisoning. The question isn't whether massive overdoses are dangerous - they clearly are. The question is whether decades of daily supplementation at "normal" doses leads to subtle, cumulative harm that we're not adequately tracking.
The half-life of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is only 15-30 days, and our bodies do have mechanisms to break down excess. But this doesn't tell the whole story. Tissue calcification and cellular disruption may occur through different mechanisms than simple blood level accumulation. We need to distinguish between acute toxicity (rare) and potential long-term effects (unstudied).
3. The Manufacturing Horror
Before we examine the studies claiming benefits, we need to understand what exactly people are swallowing. The manufacturing process of vitamin D3 isn't just industrial -- it's a chemical nightmare that would horrify anyone who saw it.
The manufacturing process reveals the truth more starkly than any academic paper could. Agent131711 traced the journey from slaughterhouse to supplement bottle, and it reads like a horror story dressed up as science.
It starts with sheep destined for slaughter. Their wool, coated in lanolin (sebaceous gland secretions), gets washed with industrial detergents. The extracted lanolin then undergoes a "dehydrobromination reaction" using either 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine (derived from coal tar) or a cocktail of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, N-Bromosuccinimide, and chloroform. Yes, chloroform -- the same substance used to knock people unconscious in old movies, now being used to create your "essential nutrient."
The mixture gets heated to 248°F, creating what the patent documents charmingly call a "soup" -- melted lanolin swimming in industrial chemicals. To speed dissolution, they add methanol and benzene. Benzene, for context, is what causes leukemia in factory workers. It's so toxic that OSHA strictly regulates workplace exposure, yet it's a standard ingredient in vitamin D production.
Next comes "purification" through a Diels-Alder cycloaddition, followed by irradiation in what's essentially an industrial X-ray machine. The base for this irradiation can be aluminum oxide (linked to Alzheimer's) mixed with more benzene. The irradiation supposedly "activates" the vitamin -- though what it's really doing is bombarding sheep grease with radiation after it's been dissolved in carcinogens.
The process continues: separation, filtration, heating until only crystals remain, then pulverizing into powder. These crystals, born from wool wax and baptized in benzene, dried and crushed into dust, are what we're told is identical to what our skin produces in sunshine. The same substance that, when mixed with flour and sugar, becomes D-Con rat poison. When cut with soy oil, becomes your doctor-recommended supplement.
The factories producing this are primarily in China and India, where environmental regulations are suggestions rather than rules. The powder ships worldwide in industrial drums, the same shipping infrastructure that moves industrial chemicals, because that's what this is -- an industrial chemical with a marketing department.
Now, defenders of supplementation will argue that many life-saving medications use similar industrial processes. Insulin involves genetically modified E. coli. Antibiotics require complex fermentation. Even "natural" supplements undergo extensive processing. They'll say the manufacturing process is a red herring – what matters is the final molecule, not how it's made.
This would be a fair point if we were talking about acute, life-saving medications given to sick people under medical supervision. But we're not. We're talking about something added to the milk supply, mandated in infant formula, recommended for daily consumption by healthy people for their entire lives. The standards should be different. When you're mass-medicating entire populations, the origin and purity matter enormously.
Moreover, the manufacturing process reveals something crucial: this isn't a nutrient we're extracting from food. It's an industrial chemical we're creating through industrial processes, then retroactively calling it identical to what our bodies produce. Would we accept this logic for other hormones? If we synthesized testosterone from coal tar and chloroform, would we add it to the milk supply and call it essential nutrition?
This is what we're being told to give our infants. This is what's mandated in milk. This is what your doctor measures in your blood and declares you deficient without. Not sunshine captured in a bottle, but sheep's wool dissolved in chloroform, irradiated like nuclear waste, crystallized through benzene, and packaged as health.
Digimon Adventure 02
I decided to practice what I preach and watch 02 with no expectations or wounds from the past.
Disclaimer: This review is extensive and highly subjective. Also, if you're someone who loves 02 from a place of deep nostalgia and fondness, this review probably isn't for you. I don't mean to sour any cherished memories, just to organize my thoughts and share my opinion.
02 continues the story of Digimon Adventure, following a new generation of chosen children while introducing new rules and a completely different tone.
It starts 3 years after the original group returned home. Now, the Digital World is being taken over by a mysterious kid calling himself the Digimon Kaiser, who is enslaving Digimon with Dark Rings and building Dark Towers that block evolution. These towers and rings run on the black D-3 he uses, which messes with the laws of the Digital World and creates chaos. The chosen children can't easily get back in, as there are no open portals while this is happening.
New next gen Digivices appear and choose 3 new kids, Daisuke, Miyako and Iori. Through a digital gate at their school, they manage to enter the Digital World, where they receive Digimentals that allow them to activate Armor Digivolution, an alternative form of evolution that doesn't rely on traditional levels and isn't affected by the Dark Towers.
Takeru and Hikari, who attend the same school as the new chosen, also join the mission, bringing their prior experience and strong bond with Patamon and Tailmon. Together, they form a new team to face the Digimon Kaiser.
Spotify is being weird. What do you mean Beyonce is one of my top artists? I have only played Jimin, JK, Jin, J Hope, BTS, Yoongi, RM and Taehyung. I mean Loco and Wendy I will accept will be in there or Taeyang or Sofia Carson, Gaecko and Yoon Mirae. But Beyonce? I like her songs but not in my playlist since a long long time. (Before chapter 2)
Anyone else’s? You probably didn’t notice because yours is more diverse but I construct my own playlist so this is weird to me.