what amuses me about any "reform vs abolish" topic is that, like many things in life, people speak of it as if the situation (and thus its solution) is black and white when in reality they are intertwined. like the rise in mixed-methodology research and the awareness of intersectional identities, and the combined success of both the Black Panther Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, both extremes are needed to ensure revolution of whatever issue is being addressed.
take for example incarceration. there are those pushing for safer conditions in carceral settings, those pushing for alternatives to incarceration, and those pushing for decarceration as a whole, when in reality, all of these things on their own will not solve the issue. oh, sure, we can instill policies to make prisons safe but there'll still be the issue of mass incarceration. and sure, we can fund alternatives to incarceration like community based corrections and SUD treatment facilities but without addressing the issues that make prisons unsafe, we're just providing a new setting for the same treatment (the same way slavery was abolished but share-cropping was literally the 'rose by any other name'). and sure we can work towards decarceration but it will either take a while, leaving people in unsafe situations, or it will be like when mental hospitals were closed and a lot of people were left without the supports of a system they were conditioned to be reliant upon and often no knowledge of the world they're released into.
but if we work to make prisons safer, while investing in alternatives to incarceration that address the issues of mass incarceration (largely, honestly, substances and commercial sex economy), then steps can be taken towards smart decarceration, with supports set up so we're not just releasing millions of folx with no game plan.










