Redraw of an old comic. Watch Dharmakshetra but go in with the attitude of watching reality tv
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Japan
seen from Brazil
seen from Belarus

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland
seen from France
seen from Japan
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from China
seen from France

seen from France

seen from New Zealand

seen from United Kingdom
Redraw of an old comic. Watch Dharmakshetra but go in with the attitude of watching reality tv
Atychiphobia
(Atychiphobia: the fear of failure)
I was watching Dharmakshetra and Arjun said this one line in the courtroom that fed into my shitty father arjun headcanons and... this came out!
Forgiveness and Justice in the Mahābhārata
The main antagonists of the Mahābhārata, namely, Duryodhana, his uncle, Śakuni, and Karṇa (yes, if antagonists are to be named, Karṇa is one per the Critical Edition and per Kṛṣṇa’s comments) commit a series of horrific actions throughout the epic, motivated by greed, jealousy, and spite. Offences include assassination attempts, deceit, sexual harassment and assault. Still, what I love is that Kṛṣṇa and the Pāṇḍavas continue to offer them opportunities for redemption, which they refuse. The war comes to be, justice is delivered, and all the Kauravas perish. However, by finding their end, they find redemption in relative terms, and, as we learn in the last parva, all proceed to svarga, or to heaven.
First, I find it significant to underline that the characters are not passively forgiven and welcomed into svarga. As they refuse to redeem themselves, they are forgiven only AFTER justice is delivered and they are made to take responsibility for what they have done, and after direct action is taken against their misdeeds. Forgiveness or compassion are therefore not passive in this context. I would maintain that what is underlined here is that forgiveness and love do not imply blindness to another’s harmful behaviour; on the contrary.
Second, I highlighted that their redemption occurs in relative terms, because, at the level of the Absolute / Consciousness, there is nothing to be redeemed as there is no fracture, only flow; however, as Ādyashanti teaches, the relative concomitantly and paradoxically very much exists in the container of its own laws.
Of course, the cosmology of the war is much more complex than this and is neither an act of punishment nor one of revenge; I would say it is more of a re-establishment of equilibrium in the relative playing field.
I think this is beautiful to ponder on. No matter how far they fell into cruelty and dejection, they found redemption. Indeed, Draupadī herself as Śrī forgives Aśvatthāmā after justice is delivered, who commits the most gruesome crime there is per Kṛṣṇa (that of killing a child).
And, so can we, can't we? Redeem ourselves and make amends for our cruelties and for our mistakes. Take action when action is needed. And rest in “redemptive love” (another beautiful coinage by Ādya. I love him so much 😊 )
IG: @musingsonthemahabharata
Havan | Day - VII •Adaptation•
Dharmakshetra (2014 - 2015)
In the Epic Tv series Dharmakshetra, the paatra (characters) from the Mahabharata appear in Chitragupta's court after their deaths to answer questions regarding their deeds in the mortal world.
It is conceptualised in light of the Kurukshetra War's aftermath. Each character is accused to be guilty by other associates based on their actions in the epic, and the former is required to provide defences.
The individuals present in the witness box are alleged certain blames which read out by Chitragupta and are given the option of defending themselves or taking the fall.
Though the concept, sets and the acting is to die for; the show detaches itself from the VedVyas' Mahabharata quite a bit and is mostly based on infamous narratives or folk tales.
@agnisuta | Havan 2022 | Day #7
Abhimanyu is good at sarcasm and passive aggression
very happy (& a tad relieved) to have finished & submitted my lent term papers!! it's been fun - i wrote about:
¬the particularities of purity, impurity & pollution in the context of non-dual philosophy
¬the myth of religious violence
¬the western commodification of spirituality.
my favourite essay to work on has been: "The Question of Religious Violence in the Mahābhārata", in which i explored Mahābhārata's cosmological rationalisation of violence through the concept of mahāpralaya (great dissolution) and through beloved Kṛṣṇa's actions, addressed in the light of his self-identification with the destructive function of the divine: the all-consuming Time (Kāla). i juxtaposed this with the more secular stances the epic extolls, such as ahiṃsā (non-violence) & ānṛśaṁsya (non-cruelty) in the context of dharma-yuddha (just war). the overarching argument has been ~ it is simplistic to claim that the thematic preoccupation with conflict of an ample spiritual text such as the Mahābhārata instigates violence, as the epic's fascination with conflict stems from its attempt to understand & unravel (& often regulate!) violence.
anyway, the personal conclusion i have reached is that, if i could spend my life writing about Kṛṣṇa, Draupadī and the Mahābhārata, i would - i certainly aim to!
pictured: my favourite sequence of the Kurukṣetra War & one of my favourite paintings - beloved Kṛṣṇa attacking Bhīṣma, while Arjuna pleads. the epic's verses are hauntingly beautiful:
¬ Filled with wrath, the great lord of Yoga jumped from the chariot. The mighty Kṛṣṇa of immeasurable splendour, the Lord of the Universe, roared like a lion. With eyes red as copper from rage and with his bare arms alone as weapons, he rushed towards Bhīṣma, desirous of slaying him. Now, with a whip in hand, Kṛṣṇa splits the universe itself with his tread. Robed in yellow silk, and himself dark as the lapis lazuli, Janārdana looked as beautiful as a mass of clouds charged with lightning. With a loud roar, the bull of Madhu's race impetuously darted towards Bhīṣma. Beholding him of eyes like lotus petals, Bhīṣma addressed Govinda: "Come, come, O thou of eyes of lotus. I am yours." ¬
Krishna : In every era, the power of a woman can bring about the biggest change.
Which is what you did.
Draupadi : No matter what you are for anyone. But for me you will always be my best friend.
Krishna : This statement means more to me, than any other worship. I’ve surrendered myself to the one who thought of me as a friend. Forever and ever!
#DharmaKshetra #Episode26
If I see ANOTHER adaptation calling bheeshma's death chhal or adharm or anything I will start killing people