After 18 Years on Facebook, My Post Gets Removed… on Election Night
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from Norway
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Norway
After 18 Years on Facebook, My Post Gets Removed… on Election Night
The Evolution of Idea Dissemination: From Tradition to the Digital Age
The way ideas spread today differs significantly from the past due to advancements in technology, communication methods, and societal structures. Here are some key contrasts:
1. Speed of Dissemination
Past: Ideas spread slowly, often taking years or decades to reach wide audiences. They relied on oral traditions, handwritten manuscripts, or physical transportation of printed materials.
Present: Ideas can spread instantaneously through the internet, social media, and global communication networks.
2. Accessibility
Past: Access to new ideas was limited to certain groups, such as the educated elite, clergy, or ruling classes.
Present: Most individuals with internet access can share, access, and contribute to the spread of ideas, making the process more democratic.
3. Scale and Reach
Past: Ideas spread regionally or through specific trade routes and cultural exchanges.
Present: Ideas have global reach, transcending borders and cultural boundaries in seconds.
4. Gatekeepers
Past: Dissemination was controlled by gatekeepers like monarchs, religious authorities, publishers, or academic institutions.
Present: While gatekeepers (media platforms, algorithms) still exist, the decentralized nature of the internet allows individuals to bypass traditional controls.
5. Forms of Communication
Past: Ideas were communicated through spoken word, art, or written texts (letters, books).
Present: Multimedia formats (videos, memes, podcasts) and interactive platforms facilitate dynamic and engaging forms of communication.
6. Authenticity and Misinformation
Past: Ideas often underwent rigorous scrutiny before widespread acceptance due to slower dissemination.
Present: The rapid spread of ideas increases the risk of misinformation and lack of critical vetting.
7. Virality
Past: Ideas spread through deliberate networks, requiring effort and planning to reach new audiences.
Present: Social media algorithms and viral phenomena allow ideas to spread rapidly without intentional promotion.
8. Collaboration and Feedback
Past: Collaboration on ideas often required physical proximity or slow correspondence.
Present: Online platforms enable real-time collaboration, feedback, and adaptation of ideas globally.
9. Personalization
Past: The same message was often disseminated broadly with little tailoring to individual preferences.
Present: Algorithms personalize the spread of ideas, tailoring content to individual tastes, biases, and interests.
10. Longevity
Past: Ideas often endured longer due to limited new information and the slower pace of societal change.
Present: Ideas can have shorter lifespans, quickly replaced by newer concepts in the fast-paced information ecosystem.
Implications
This shift in how ideas spread affects everything from politics and culture to education and economics, creating both opportunities for innovation and challenges like misinformation and polarization. The immediacy and interconnectedness of modern communication reshape how society processes and adapts to new ideas.
We can have democracy, or we can have a surveillance society, but we cannot have both.
The United States and the world’s other liberal democracies have thus far failed to construct a coherent political vision of a digital century that advances democratic values, principles and government. While the Chinese have designed and deployed digital technologies to advance their system of authoritarian rule, the West has remained compromised and ambivalent.
This failure has left a void where democracy should be, and the dangerous result has been a two-decade drift toward private systems of surveillance and behavioral control outside the constraints of democratic governance.
VOTING PSA - PLEASE BOOST!
Hey Y’all,
While I myself, as a minor, am unable to vote, I know that voting is the way that change is made in a democracy like that of the United States. Even though the country is definitely struggling due to the coronavirus, the best way to see the changes that you want to happen is to use your constitutional rights and VOTE! Vote, not only for a President and Vice-President, but for Congresspeople, Senators, Sheriffs, School Board members, and other Federal and local officials who exemplify your moral values, and who will represent the voices of the people they are sworn to protect. You can register to vote at 18, and you can pre-register at 16. FOLLOW @futurevoterssocal on Instagram for more information on how to register to vote, or go to https://thecivicscenter.org/register to REGISTER.
To all my wonderful followers, please boost this message so that as many people as possible vote in our upcoming elections this fall. Your voice matters, and you should not be afraid to use it. Please feel free to message me any questions you may have!
A bipartisan project is crafting tools and strategies to protect US elections against cyberattacks.
Patriotic Americans #DefendingDigitalDemocracy since Trump and Republicans refused.
Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center has launched Defending Digital Democracy, a bipartisan effort to offer technology, strategies and other tools that can protect against election-oriented cyberattacks. And when they say it's an across-the-aisle effort, they mean it.
Campaign managers, Robby Mook for former presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Matt Rhoades for Mitt Romney will help lead the group, as will
Alex Stamos - Chief Security Office, Facebook
Heather Adkins - Director, Information Security, Google
Dmitri Alperovitch - Co-founder and CTO, Crowdstrike
The head of the group is Eric Rosenbach, who was Chief of Staff to recent Defense Secretary Ash Carter.
Read more about the details and the other participants from Harvard Press Release
Israel Exposed Archives
Witnesses of Atrocities and Genocide
Link to the website: https://watermeloncrimes.com/
If social media profits from our attention, data, and content, why do so many creators struggle to be seen? My latest op-ed explores algorithmic visibility, digital labor, and why I’m spending less time feeding platforms that give so little back.
Social Media platforms Wants Us as a slaves, Not a users
The Invisible Swarm: How Artificial Intelligence is Quietly Manufacturing Public Opinion
Imagine scrolling through your social media feed just weeks before a major election. You see passionate debates unfolding in the comments. You read heartfelt stories from people who seem to live right in your neighborhood. They use your local slang, they share your sense of humor, and they express the same nuanced frustrations you feel about the world. It looks and feels exactly like a genuine…