#dms-5

[heartfeltspace]

Sometimes we all succumb to the thoughts of "am I faking?" especially when we see the disorder presenting so differently in someone else, as a caretaker I know it well with some members of my system.

So I thought we'd start off with the diagnostic criteria for DID that is in the DSM-5. This is the only must have with dissociative identity disorder.

Disruption of identity that is categorized by two or more distinct personality states.

Recurrent gaps in the recall of everyday events, important personal information, and/or traumatic events that are inconsistent with ordinary forgetfulness.

The symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

The disturbance is not explained by cultural or religious practice.

The symptoms are not attributed to the physical effects of a substance (ie alcohol intoxication) or underlying medical condition (ie complex partial seizures)

All of that is pretty standard, you have alters, you have amnesia, and it negatively impacts your every day life and it's not the result of a spiritual practice or substance abuse. That is all the criteria that you need to meet for suspected DID to be DID.

I know that there's a lot of self proclaimed misinformation experts online who bring out a lot of anxiety regarding faking DID. But the truth is a difference in presentation beyond the criteria for DID is not indication of faking DID. It's important to note that DID is severely under researched and even articles in the last 10 years are outdated (such as core theory being disproven semi recently by the theory of structural dissociation).

If you're polyfragmantion, if you have subsystems, if you are introject heavy (fictive and/or factive) there is a reason for it and you are NOT faking for having difference in presentation. The reason all those misinformation blogs don't focus on those subjects is that the research regarding it is very lackluster as the current moment.

The brain is very intricate and your presentation likely could be influenced by commborid disorders that others you see online do not have. Personally we have OCPD and the presentation of OCPD commborid with DID is something we have yet to find any research papers on.

You know yourself better than strangers online. You know your symptoms and your trauma better than strangers online.

[ocd-ocpd-and-me]

I just received a message asking "is there a test that tells you if you have OCD?”, and I thought I would post the answer here for all my followers to see

To be diagnosed (tested for) any mental illness, you need to make an appointment with a doctor, and ask the doctor for a referral to a psychologist.

A psychologist will give you some questionnaires to fill out, and will talk with you and assess you. Psychologists diagnose people according to a manual they have, called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Many mental illnesses have similar symptoms, and there are a range of mental illnesses that are on a spectrum (a scale). It is important to get diagnosed correctly so that you can receive the correct treatment/counselling for your problem.

If you are unsatisfied with your diagnosis or simply want another opinion you can go back to your doctor and ask to be referred to a different psychologist.

It may take a few sessions with a psychologist for them to diagnose you. They need and want to be thorough.

Please feel free to message me if you have any questions about the process.

Love and light.

[byebyedonewitheverythingbye]

I mean what the heck DMS-5? You are, like, basically saying anyone with a big hobby or love for something has a freaking disorder.

This gets even worse when parents read your stuff and think that because his kid has been reading a lot of Harry Potter or playing Final Fantasy, he/she needs to see a doctor who is going to give the poor thing medication for no reason.

(The latest DMS is from 2013 but  I am still not over it really. This is getting worse and worse. The worse part is that I really want to attack the APA for this in my thesis but instead I have to go saying they are the law... as if!)

(...did I mention this is getting worse and worse?)

[socialjusticesolutions]

DSM-5 Boycott: Where Are All The Social Workers, Part 5

Where Are the Social Workers?: One Social Worker’s Road to Active Opposition to the New DSM Jack Carney, DSW December, 2013 The following is the fourth part of a serialized, four-part version of a larger article that has been accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in 2014. The larger article is a compilation of three articles written in November, 2011, and in February and May, 2012, about the DSM-5 and its anticipated adverse impact on those in emotional distress who seek help from practitioners who utilize the DSM. In the series published here, the three articles are preceded by an Introduction, which constitutes Part I. They are subsequently followed by several Afterwords written in August, 2012, and April, July and August, 2013. The Afterwords comprise Part IV; references for all four parts will be found at the conclusion of Part IV. CLICK HERE TO READ FULL ARTICLE