Images, or more specifically, photographs, can be presented in many different ways. Through editorials, slideshows, newspapers, or in a gallery to name a few examples. Each different method of presentation can be manipulated to make the audience read and interpret it uniquely. For example, a picture of the devastating Grenfell fire ablaze was, the day after the disaster, used on the front page of many of the newspapers accross the nation. Exactly the same photograph was printed by each newspaper, but the presentation of it varies, and makes a huge difference to how it is received. The Sun and The Guardian are very different publications and therefore use very different methods of presentation. The Sun uses a cropped, badly printed version of the photograph edited to make the flames brighter and more vulgar. It uses it in conjunction with a large, inconsiderate headline and put a small image in the corner of two silhouettes in the window waving for help. The intense and ethically questionable nature of the this presentation makes the evaluation of the news it shows very quick and very one biased. The Guardian however, use it alongside a detailed article, headed up by facts, and a much darker, more detailed print of the image. These methods of presentation are juxtaposed to fit in with the style of each of the newspapers. Photographs and the way they are presented can be analysed in various different ways. Each will carry its own methodology; the way in which the audience interprets the image using things like History, Philosophy, Globalisation Theory or Photography theory. Looking at Eddo Hartmann’s ‘Setting The Stage: Pyongyang, 2015’. A series of images captured by Hartmann as became one of the first photographers allowed to document the extremely private country of North Korea. This set of images becomes much more important when analysed not just aesthetically, but with a methodology, and more specifically with History. The country has been a huge talking point in the news for a long time, known for its privacy, eccentric and questionable leaders, and its lies. When applying this to the series, it starts to change the way that we analyse them visually as well as contextually. The images reflect this sombre tone that seems to resonate from the country. They show little of the people, and the exceptions are made using techniques like slow shutter speeds to mostly blur the people out and leave a strange, ghostly mist where they would have been. It is obvious that, like is rumoured that anybody that visits the country is, Hartmann was escorted around and following a strict set of ground rules to present the country in a good light. When applying this to the analysis of the pictures, it shows Hartmann has cleverly shot many images to do this, but to also highlight the strange communist regimes. The picture of the leaders on the tube systems, for example, slyly shows the eerie signs of the totalitarian dictatorship while not obviously painting it in a bad light, and therefore being allowed to release them. It shows that photographs can be deeply analysed using various methods unique to each print, and that many are contextually much richer than an audience may first think.