'Kineticism & Potentiality, Technology, Spirituality, The Tension of the Animate'
The only ultimate concern of any philosopher that prioritizes technology and the advancement of the Universe as a unified whole (as far as the living species) is one that is ironically outside of its own philosophy. It is a philosophy that extends its destination within the path of where the destination does not even exist. But it must be an existential philosophy of animate beings that the unmanifested would be impacted by manifest, some tension between the realms of knowing and wonder, furthermore regulated by the tension of activity.
A.I. is a concern in our modern world because it seems that this is the answer to make things better; essentially it is deeply rooted in the deep affection that the human race has with creation itself, or the mystery of their origin.
Even if the ultimate goal were achieved and Universal singularity were achieved, or maybe at least that of the animate beings' work, the realm of manifestation will eventually collapse, much earlier, the end of that species. What is the matter, then? From our beginning to our end, what is truly the goal of existence other than what is guided through through the laws duration?
What is the guise of technological advancement? Is it something that we animate being desire for a decrease of existential tension or is it a catalyst for spiritual growth? It seems that All-Potential has already been created, so who are we to create further only for a means of existential tension? This represents lack of inner structure and homeostasis within the structure, thus creating the activity of animate beings.
It is not to say that stagnation is the answer to our problems, or that existence itself is. But it is to say that we do in fact exist and all that can be accomplished is neutral to whether is will, should, shouldn't or won't. This inquires that we must carefully decide our endeavors and articulate the focal points of which are existential tensions differ, as well as in how they amass into mutuality. What direction are we really going in furthering technology despite the excitement of artificial potentiality?
Knowledge itself is a force against the primordial creation, it disables potentiality and enables kineticism. In the law of rhythm it is depicted that there is this polarity of activity/passivity for the endurance of creation. But what is it then that it leaves out the philosophy of non-endurance, death and regeneration? To the animated, neutralization is meaningless, yet, philosophers of the same brand give exceeding gratitude to the element of stagnation, or neutralization, in the premise that it is a vertex of creation.
We must ask and interrogate ourselves; "Is the Universe we are created in truly inquiring the direction of complexity on a conscious level?"
The kinetic will respond, "Yes."
The philosopher will respond, "The meaning of creation is itself, and what the one of it makes it."
The passive or perhaps non-ambitious seem to be, in the minds of the kinetic, to merely perish at the standpoint of stagnation, and it is a terrible irony of the kinetic, a "sin" unto true source creation, or God.
Kineticism creates within the material realm, while passivity enables and furthers the dimensional trusion of potentiality, reenacting the source event. It binds itself with resonance and field, whereas activity merely moves through the binds. Furthermore, it would be said that this inner world of creation would better off first move and 'collect data' to enrich the inner world, however the activity of knowledge may become sin when one has become infatuated with it, creating it to be the ultimate philosophy, leading to the possible loss of even creating this inner world through vibrational conversion, if not regulated.
Our world is at ends of societal evolution. Our planet is big, and the history of the beings upon it is more vast than the planet's itself. We must interrogate the Godhead of our human philosophy. Are we able to truly interpret the non-philosophy of all-creation, or the direction of a being that merely presides within it?
It seems that our mundane society, the common folk and consumers, are obsessed with futurism and it is prevalent in cinema, gaming, media, television, etc. This obsession has been created by those who obsess in higher positions of wealth and power, for the populace to forge this reality for them, ultimately leaving us behind in a wide gap f capability and survival. This obsession of the mundane creates the direction, builds the railroad tracks to the new world that they and their lineage may not even see the extent of. Yet it is sacrificed in face of the sometimes spiritually overwhelming tension of survival and pleasure. The fact that bliss creates a radian of magnetism in the X-chromosome of our DNA does not incite that this is the true goal; All things have contradiction and are therefore incited balance. Our current human mind could not withstand the sense of pleasure that would override the circuitry of our clear thinking in the future generations. This means that existential tension must be long-suffered, and that the direction must be sacrificed. The linearism of conscious activity is not the necessity as of absolute direction, not one thing is.
The feelings one has for humanity, especially if it is nurturing and excited with its potential, must understand this in every philosophy that the Universe will go on until it is devoid, regardless of our existence in it. What goal then, would one have other than to make its existence what it wants? To share a goal with All-creation, and that is the direction of balance, homeostasis out of and in duration. This requires constant self-evaluation on all levels, which requires the stillness of meditation, further truly creating a something to be analyzed for the vector of movement by which the animate moves. Judgement comes last, and then a new beginning.
In analogy, the cells in our body do not function to evolve merely to transcend its own current veil, it is the body that decides this in its entire complexity; this is what will to the utmost is. If the cells do not communicate it creates cancer, or a virus of some sort within the structure. This analogy is in mutuality with the philosophy of what is desired to be accomplished by the kinetic, but it seems that the kinetic have deconstructed itself of its role.
Knowledge offers endurance, not power. Endurance in this realm is movement, and if one stays in philosophical motion it will evolve and revolve around its forthgoing in momentum. There must be friction. Is this not implied by the nature of gravity for growing mass? If we are to truly reenact our creation as animate beings, what would be then be doing if we were to accelerate our current path and prizing of knowledge over ignorance? There are truly things we are not meant to know, and this is prevalent in every life throughout its spiritual journey. Because we want to know does not mean we are ready to know, especially for ourselves. When we are ready, it will come naturally without the obstruction of structural/conscious inner inclination.