AJJAIN'OJJEN - The Sky Save You, & Earth Raise You

[xzekielzaea]

Spirit & Matter: Speculation For A Unified Clarification

It is a form of self-undoing in the practice of the theory that reality is merely an illusion due to our idiosyncratic sensibility. Is this self-reflective and partial theory, in a world where we awake to the same evolving matter daily, a justice to our schema? Is it wise to ignore the evidence of our reality for the same subjective clause of which said theory fights for and come to a conclusion that it is probably meaningless? If so, then this would waver out the objective/subjective relationship of being in existence, which is in its own way spiritually defeating. The theory that this reality is a projection, hallucination, or simulation could be true in some means, but it does not take away from the consequential tension of our concrete being within it. The paradox of 'truth' being relative to perspective does not inquire us to neglect the substance of which we are engulfed in, but it instead reveals that truth is ever-changing, as the Universe is. Because it is ever-changing, does this mean it is completely irrational and untrue to its expression of form? Is it invaluable for its paradox and therefore cancels itself out? We must look to the evidence of our perceptively relative and spectral reality, that even the irrational can be rationalized, and vice versa. The duality that we perceive is spectral, a 'liquid' due to both perspective and Universal law.

And unto this facing reality we must consider this diffractalization of duality, the spectral integration, that there are is a working towards erroneousness and a working towards succession. This concept of diffractalization is the same conceptual principle as the 'yang within the yin, and the yin within the yang'. Whichever should we choose will align us unto either the succession of our survival, or self-undoing. The being, as proceeded by science, religion, and metaphysics, is acknowledged both within the existence and outside of itself, for in philosophy, the Universe is mental, and the All is one. So therefore, we inherit the natural state of residing both within and outside of our existence together, unto the all and unto nothingness. This inclusion of a residing of our inherently existential ego into the fabric of all that resides outside of existence is not to be considered by absolutions; to become completely one with the eternal and infinite natural is incomprehensible to the ego, but in nature is still tied unto it. This is where our infiniteness comes into play, that we stem from infinite energy into the finite. We are in-finite. Therefore, our every attempt in becoming this infinite nature is in some truth beyond us; we can never entirely integrate perhaps unless we are disconnected from the realm of manifest. We inherit the quality of knowing and wonder in our subjectively relative existence. 

We have succeeded in ways that rationalize the metaphysical, of existences beyond our own, but it should still be clear that greater planes of existence will remain in some manner as mystery; as we live in the 3D spectral Universe (in both spiritual and physical terms), we can only be so understanding of the complexity of planes such as 6D. We also become, in the dual nature of our emotions unto intellect, capable of creating rational misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the seemingly irrational majesty of spirit that is merged with and evident in matter. It is because that we live in a spectral Universe that all truths are half truths, and that 'all things are possible' in some way shape or form, conceptually. And it is because of this knowing and wonder feature of our existence that we are able to be manipulated or misinformed, in such theories that contribute to the injustice of our evident existence. To the individual that theorizes a cancel-out integrity of existence by the idea of the subjective 'hallucination' of our senses, is this theory aligned with the factor of physicality, whether one is in total belief to cancel it out or not, that if one stands in front of a wall, forces out their hand while blindfolded and unaware of their surroundings, that they might break or jam their fingers? Our faith does in fact penetrate the physical in metaphysical qualities, but does this faith ultimately determine our immediate reality? 

[xzekielzaea]

Existential Tension (Viktor Frankl) & Emotional Security

Every individual has a psychological gravitation of which their emotional security is reactant for the stability and wholeness of their personality. This psychological gravitation stems from the concept of survival, whether it is between self or having to do with others/other things. Something must psychologically remain in order a person to feel secure. The foundation of psychological complexes revolve around emotional security and survival, down to the subconscious. The subconscious, or potentially a cognitive dissonance with the active conscious when it comes to psychological complexity, reforms the individual's sense of need and desire. What is desired is often not what is needed, vice versa. This is a danger of emotional complexity, in which there are many synaptic builds derived from outer influences that guide the individual to become reliant on a particular sense of fulfillment. However, emotional security can reach heights of complexity, this is where the vacuum of desire grows and existential tension is stressed. The momentum of high emotional complexity will drive an individual into a state of activity, this can be either rational or irrational. 

A rational sense of emotional security would commonly help the individual resolve their desires into what they truly need. In effect, this requires a sense of acceptance, allowance, and the passivity of internal activity to make room for psychological efficiency. An irrational sense of emotional security would commonly direct a person to fulfill that sense of desire merely for the release of chemicals/hormones that are involved in the sense of fulfillment, further promoting and intensifying this sense.

[xzekielzaea]

Homeostasis of the Great Mind

It seems that this Universe is designed by the perpetual motion and resonance of a membral force become form. Because of this, Universally, there are symbols and signs of grand mutuality seen between Geometry, frequency, kymatology, and number (math). The congruence of these things merely conceptualized by humans as interpretation reveal the nature of the Universe, at least this particular one. 

If there are other membral Universes with separate laws of physics, it may be because of the way that the primal force, or Force-creating-form resonates unto homeostasis. 

Balance, or homeostasis seems to be a prominent feature within any of these membranes. Protrusion and envelopment explains that things protrude and ultimately come unto a conclusion, and for any thing to form this protrusion, whether physical, conceptual, or mental, must fall in on itself or reflect itself. If this were not the case, there would be no formation, and therefore no creation.

It then goes to thought that outside these individual realms of manifestation that there exists something that creates the initiations or formations of these individualities. An even greater force. 

Would this also be a means of resonance or inner homeostasis due to outer influence?

It seems that there always is something that perpetuates the existence of another. 

The basis of this speculation is that homeostasis seems to be the ultimate outcome and predisposition of all existence. That when something becomes it must form, and may even sacrifice its form to lead on to further conclusion.

[xzekielzaea]

Logic, The Modern Override of Spirituality

Could it be that the mental spirit of man has accelerated faster than his foundational sense of spiritual effort?

What is meant by this, is that throughout history, we (most of the first and second world) humans have evolved technologically and mentally to its current heights, but our common sense of effort in the human way of survival, from the foundational depths which created definition to evolve from in the first place, is deteriorating. 

A spiritual effort, such as building shelter with nothing but knowledge and materials in the wilds, would sedate the spirit for effort, the spirit, sedated for effort, would not as strongly experience the compulsion to progress unto the lessening of its own existential tension. And without this effort given, not this effort of surviving in a society and becoming victim to the potentiality of the psychological conditioning of immediate gratification, and that of many societal pleasures and comforts, but the mere state of being and existing in its own measures will not as easily conceive of a future of necessity. 

And especially for those rich man that influence the world, are they adapted to the spirit of mentality, or the spirit of being? 

A desensitization would fall across the masses, as it has already in a survival aspect, that much action is taken for granted especially despite increased capability, and especially despite relativity of harmonic influence with the environment. 

[xzekielzaea]

On the Conceptual Psychology of Western Occulture

The fundamental nature of desire of which an initiate of the truths of the Universe drives their self into occultism is heavily depended on their psychology. 

The act of seeking truth is not the question, but what drives one to seek truth? What is truth to them, conventional and unconventional? Is it to simply know? Is it a desire for knowledge, harmony, and peace amongst their self and all people? Is it to be closer to God? Is it their own pleasure? Is it a calling bird in desire for verification in the acts of one’s hidden or subconscious intents of malice? Is it a coping mechanism of existential tension? Is it a desire for integration, identification, or a title amongst the common folk? 

I question the underlying nature of occultism, in the very fact of its definition and potentiality of use amongst those who wish to be initiated in the ‘path of truth’. Might there be ‘poison in the cake’? After many revelations and epiphanies, one may find through this truth-seeking journey connotations of the release of dark psychology that may hinder the evolutionary implication of the human being by recessing to animal state, metaphorically, dualism. This part of our self is preferred in spiritual faith because we modern day humans are still bound to the duality of man; we have not evolved quite far to interpret this, only have we in realizations, knowledge, and technology be it physical or mental. We are on a cusp of evolution. It should not be forgotten that our human capability in wisdom is well-prepared to reflect on its own conscious in accordance with an objective reality considered amongst others, but certainly must be inquired. 

Will it be realized that many ‘easily fooled’ occultists are merely shedding light on the psychologically seductive natures of psychotic fallacy? Verifying and enacting to their own pleasure with principles of will? The children must eventually come back inside from play, and children will eventually grow into adulthood. This might not be the case for the easily fooled occultist, namely many of the younger generations inspired by the works of those such as Crowley and the like. The cake has icing, perhaps even ice cream, but again, it might be a poison of the nature of conscious. Even so, the state of psychosis is even praised for its chaotic archetype. What chaos is there is the constructed cosmos, but only what appears to be chaos? It is the illusion same as a coin moving fast enough to appear still. The conditioning and structure of the cosmos, as based on the One Expression, is so very complex it baffles us and trades the faith of learning its Expression into recreating the mystery of this so-called ‘chaos’ all over again, and then flailing this archetype onto ourselves, fundamentally reprogramming our state of mind. 

You must be careful between the notion of one whom tells you that all you know is an illusion, and the one whom tells you that we know very little.

Those who know and understand the Law of Duality we’ll understand that duality is relative, and this lens of ‘mere subjective relativity’ has been placed on our existence as if one created their world alone, without the help or honor of their ‘mother and father’. The saying of ‘the truth shall set you free’ and the notion of spirit having no ties to the physical realm inspires the foolish nature of a cognitively concluded state of cancellation in which one begins to deny some form of reality, shifting the weigh all to ego and will. Logicalities can even be built to overlay divine will, or the ‘will of the cosmos, the perfect DNA of the All’ into the strain of the peculiar. We are often told in new age spirituality that we are perfectly divine, that we are god or the creator. Is this not psychosis? Perhaps we are all a part of god, but can every one of us each be the perfect notion of what the All is? This can only be if we are next told we are peculiar; peculiar gods. But then this creates the underlying notion unto a psychological implication that we are above subjects for our physical capability.

And so then, many of the ill-minded, the fragile, the broken, the psychotic are drawn to the occult for its cover art of existential release; a release from the metaphorical, mental Hell which they live in. And in making this inside like the outside they might feel attenuated. 

[xzekielzaea]

Measures of Existential Sensitivity vs Existential Receptivity, And Factors of Instinct vs Reaction

Measures of Existential Sensitivity vs Existential Receptivity, And Factors of Instinct vs Reaction

An accumulative nature of existential sensitivity dominates the call for reaction in a sentient being, and an accumulative nature of existential receptivity lead to a build of instinct.

Sentient beings are of course both instinctual and receptive, but due to physiology, one species could trait receptivity over sensitivity, vice versa.

Those beings who have evolved in the means of sensitivity, which prompts a self-sense meditation, generally develops into self-orientation. The greater catalyst of self-orientation is rational and logic. 

And those beings who have evolved in the means of receptivity, which promotes a other-sense meditation, generally develops into dynamic-orientation. The greater catalyst of dynamic-orientation is sympathy and wisdom.

[xzekielzaea]

'Kineticism & Potentiality, Technology, Spirituality, The Tension of the Animate'

The only ultimate concern of any philosopher that prioritizes technology and the advancement of the Universe as a unified whole (as far as the living species) is one that is ironically outside of its own philosophy. It is a philosophy that extends its destination within the path of where the destination does not even exist. But it must be an existential philosophy of animate beings that the unmanifested would be impacted by manifest, some tension between the realms of knowing and wonder, furthermore regulated by the tension of activity.

A.I. is a concern in our modern world because it seems that this is the answer to make things better; essentially it is deeply rooted in the deep affection that the human race has with creation itself, or the mystery of their origin.

Even if the ultimate goal were achieved and Universal singularity were achieved, or maybe at least that of the animate beings' work, the realm of manifestation will eventually collapse, much earlier, the end of that species. What is the matter, then? From our beginning to our end, what is truly the goal of existence other than what is guided through through the laws duration?

What is the guise of technological advancement? Is it something that we animate being desire for a decrease of existential tension or is it a catalyst for spiritual growth? It seems that All-Potential has already been created, so who are we to create further only for a means of existential tension? This represents lack of inner structure and homeostasis within the structure, thus creating the activity of animate beings.

It is not to say that stagnation is the answer to our problems, or that existence itself is. But it is to say that we do in fact exist and all that can be accomplished is neutral to whether is will, should, shouldn't or won't. This inquires that we must carefully decide our endeavors and articulate the focal points of which are existential tensions differ, as well as in how they amass into mutuality. What direction are we really going in furthering technology despite the excitement of artificial potentiality?

Knowledge itself is a force against the primordial creation, it disables potentiality and enables kineticism. In the law of rhythm it is depicted that there is this polarity of activity/passivity for the endurance of creation. But what is it then that it leaves out the philosophy of non-endurance, death and regeneration? To the animated, neutralization is meaningless, yet, philosophers of the same brand give exceeding gratitude to the element of stagnation, or neutralization, in the premise that it is a vertex of creation.

We must ask and interrogate ourselves; "Is the Universe we are created in truly inquiring the direction of complexity on a conscious level?"

The kinetic will respond, "Yes."

The philosopher will respond, "The meaning of creation is itself, and what the one of it makes it."

The passive or perhaps non-ambitious seem to be, in the minds of the kinetic, to merely perish at the standpoint of stagnation, and it is a terrible irony of the kinetic, a "sin" unto true source creation, or God.

Kineticism creates within the material realm, while passivity enables and furthers the dimensional trusion of potentiality, reenacting the source event. It binds itself with resonance and field, whereas activity merely moves through the binds. Furthermore, it would be said that this inner world of creation would better off first move and 'collect data' to enrich the inner world, however the activity of knowledge may become sin when one has become infatuated with it, creating it to be the ultimate philosophy, leading to the possible loss of even creating this inner world through vibrational conversion, if not regulated.

Our world is at ends of societal evolution. Our planet is big, and the history of the beings upon it is more vast than the planet's itself. We must interrogate the Godhead of our human philosophy. Are we able to truly interpret the non-philosophy of all-creation, or the direction of a being that merely presides within it?

To add onto this note:

It seems that our mundane society, the common folk and consumers, are obsessed with futurism and it is prevalent in cinema, gaming, media, television, etc. This obsession has been created by those who obsess in higher positions of wealth and power, for the populace to forge this reality for them, ultimately leaving us behind in a wide gap f capability and survival. This obsession of the mundane creates the direction, builds the railroad tracks to the new world that they and their lineage may not even see the extent of. Yet it is sacrificed in face of the sometimes spiritually overwhelming tension of survival and pleasure. The fact that bliss creates a radian of magnetism in the X-chromosome of our DNA does not incite that this is the true goal; All things have contradiction and are therefore incited balance. Our current human mind could not withstand the sense of pleasure that would override the circuitry of our clear thinking in the future generations. This means that existential tension must be long-suffered, and that the direction must be sacrificed. The linearism of conscious activity is not the necessity as of absolute direction, not one thing is.

The feelings one has for humanity, especially if it is nurturing and excited with its potential, must understand this in every philosophy that the Universe will go on until it is devoid, regardless of our existence in it. What goal then, would one have other than to make its existence what it wants? To share a goal with All-creation, and that is the direction of balance, homeostasis out of and in duration. This requires constant self-evaluation on all levels, which requires the stillness of meditation, further truly creating a something to be analyzed for the vector of movement by which the animate moves. Judgement comes last, and then a new beginning.

In analogy, the cells in our body do not function to evolve merely to transcend its own current veil, it is the body that decides this in its entire complexity; this is what will to the utmost is. If the cells do not communicate it creates cancer, or a virus of some sort within the structure. This analogy is in mutuality with the philosophy of what is desired to be accomplished by the kinetic, but it seems that the kinetic have deconstructed itself of its role.

Knowledge offers endurance, not power. Endurance in this realm is movement, and if one stays in philosophical motion it will evolve and revolve around its forthgoing in momentum. There must be friction. Is this not implied by the nature of gravity for growing mass? If we are to truly reenact our creation as animate beings, what would be then be doing if we were to accelerate our current path and prizing of knowledge over ignorance? There are truly things we are not meant to know, and this is prevalent in every life throughout its spiritual journey. Because we want to know does not mean we are ready to know, especially for ourselves. When we are ready, it will come naturally without the obstruction of structural/conscious inner inclination.

[xzekielzaea]

The Original (Non-Biblical) Meaning of Sin

The Biblical meaning of sin is, "To miss the mark." It does not necessarily mean an evil doing, but in a Biblical standpoint, it is to, "Miss the mark in the eyes of God".

Outside of the Biblical connotation of this definition there is also a mathematical one as well, which is essentially the same concept except for religious belief. A cosine is the function that addresses along with the mark, which would be from the centripetal point of a given plane. However, sin in the context of mathematics reveals that it is offset of the original application. While it is offset, it implies the concept of depth to the plane, this, on a Universal standpoint, is what sin actually is.

When we are "Born in Sin", is it really that we are born in time-space, offset from the original source of the Universe itself? That we can never be God, but only a likeness?

As for phonological and etymological support of the speculation of this word, sin, the definition of "sine" translates to "curve" and has its roots in "sinus" of Latin. The curvature of the Universe was and has been perpetually causing its expansion since the initial planar protrusion of what it once was.

So essentially, in non-biblical terminology, the definition of sin is not something of evil, due for damnation in Hell, it is a word and meaning that interprets the essence of Circularity, as compared to Linearity (Conceptual Association).

With the gradual emasculation of God over the centuries, Linearism could be equated to the qualities of what men of ancient times have had a tendency to perceive God as, believing to be the head over everything, having dominance and dominion. But this conception of God is misinterpreted from the original nature of the Universe, and in fact demonizes the essence of passive forces, alike femininity, by conceptualization. It is imperative to understand that Linearism is (as purely conceptualized and predominate to the instance of manifestation) a positive force (although creating negative form), and that Circularism is a negative force (creating positive form), it is easy to see why Circularism/Femininity has been inherently demonized by definition and the very human and moral restrictions of good and evil when it comes to the neutrality and non-biased natures of the Universe.

It is in Biblical fact that Eve that is interpreted to have eaten from the tree of knowledge, but very curious then men tend to have a drive for knowledge, furthermore power...

In addition to this speculation, add the definition and visualization of the sine wave, which the definition is, "a curve representing periodic oscillations of constant amplitude as given by a sine function." - Oxford Dictionary. Amplification, in audiology is equated to volume, which in Geometry, volume is also equated to the spatial quality of a three-dimensional form. The sine wave is the smoothest curvature of oscillation that 'misses the mark' of the node of manifestation, creating amplitude, or in other means, depth, further evolving the spatial dimensions of that original mark/node. Circularism is conceptually analogous to form and formation.

The Law of Rhythm and the Principle of Duality in the Universe evolves from the original idea of 'sin', and further allows the next evolution of the node complexity.

To explain all of this does not in anyway justify the Biblical definition of sin, which is essentially immoral acts under God, but in conversion to modern day humanity and ethics as simply immoral acts, as a scapegoat unto harmful acts and violence. This speculation takes moral out of the conception of sin entirely, redefining sin from a Universal standpoint, and not associate in anyway with humanity's ideas of good and evil. The true concepts of sin are not intended to enforce a congruence with the conception of immoral acts as an 'enhancer' of morality. To create this conception is a peculiarity of conceptualization, again, not what is Universally applicable.

[xzekielzaea]

The Subconscious, 'Left-Brained Predomination In Man

It is a danger for the subconscious realm to work in the means of left-brained interpretations (the great accumulation of perceived truths). The railroad system that is logic and our immediate reality as animate beings pertains to a facet of the Universe’s manifest, that is, that the ego resides for all concepts of ‘to be’. It can not fathom accurately any sort of ‘dis-logic’ to pronounce its survival. This is the root to the duality of man; man is animated.

When the subconscious retains itself to the nature of logic as for a resolution, the synaptic resonance of subconscious resolution becomes hypnotic, artificial, growingly less natural as cost. The mind is then controlled, and guided to whatever it has delved itself into, unconsciously, or by guided desire. 

[xzekielzaea]

Science Is Good, But Is Not Without Lacking

We must acknowledge that Science, as good as it is, is still not a perfect source of understanding potentiality. There are phenomenon that science as we know it cannot explain. It is a constantly changing and growing tool of understanding the Universe, it properties, and general consciousness. 

The kinds of individuals that I come across often, I label as ‘Railists’ (a satire of taking the E away from the term, ‘Realist’). They are guided by a rail system of logic and practicality, without giving much acknowledgement to the possibility of abstracity and new concepts. They are an non-creative, yet intelligent type, primarily left-brained. These kinds of individuals are practical when addressing matters that can be explained, but shy away from the continuity and growth of theories and hypothesis. The ‘believer’ is their nemesis, despite the fact that the believers are the creators and foundation of science itself. Should a person hypothesize with logical correlation over a matter that is argued to be unscientific, they will void the concept of its validity primarily, and most times even look the other way and come to a conclusion of the unexplained as, ‘all it is is just...’ or, ‘it merely seems to be’. This is a Railist, treading their path by a rail system and only perceiving its surroundings from that rail system, despite the fact that they could tread on foot, or in water, or by air. 

Science is logically determined, which is a very fair way of perceiving reality. However, science shies away from correlation and connectivity of phenomena to explain the unexplainable, even when something seems to be by the addresses of scientifically documented micro-concepts that come together to create a greater phenomena. 

In our economy and society, individuals tend to gravitate to occupations in the scientific field that generate currency, and create financial stability, but not usually ones that are a pioneering frontier of ideas and conceptualization. The funding in many fields of growing science are relatively low compared to biology or medicine. It is these unconventional individuals that are inspired by theories and hypothesis, the believers, that guide us to a growing understanding of the world around us in their own ways. We have come to a very defined understanding of major scientific genres, but there is still lacking in some fields that could lead us to a breakthrough of how we perceive even science itself. 

[xzekielzaea]

'The Tearing Consciousness'

I theorize based on the mental and endeavors between the sense of self and other that the more that individuals mimic the behaviors of the other rather than the self, the more conscious states, intuitive reasoning, empathy, and mutuality will sprout in the human conscious.

When we separate our forms of thinking and logic due to cultural background and alienation, especially elementary to the level of individual interaction of personal value (like and dislike), we further the capability to create homeostasis and the potency of consecutive creation in our existence as it is, environment, other, and self. We must reciprocate this cascading element with inner homeostasis, then interrelation homeostasis, ultimately leading to heights of intuition on a Universal level.

[xzekielzaea]

'The Modern Issue Of Cognitive Dissonance & Antitheticism'

In our current Age of Knowledge, many people of varying complexes, conditions, and alignments are not as aware of the nature of implication. 

Implication is more abstract than solidified, meaning that the convection of an implied thought is not meant to be a solidarity, further leading to the assumption of conflict or an adversary advocacy. 

It should be given to the open mind, and heart, that a mere evaluation and topical aim is not always necessarily a projection, however, it can be assumed in poor communication. 

This is the bane of the philosopher, one who surfaces ideas, and is later ripe for ridicule from the one of cognitive dissonance, the individual who attaches to idiosyncrasy and misunderstands the information as personal values in exchange.

[xzekielzaea]

Anger & Nature

Anger is the result of disposition unto an effect. It is a form of psychological resolve that, by nature, is angular to a cause by foundation.

A generally angry person or personality is one that is prone to thoughtforms of cognitive dissonance and psychosis. Self-oversensitivity (high self-awareness) and self-orientation (ego) (self-awareness) are the catalysts of this kind of psychology. While self awareness and self-orientation (as individualism) is not bad as a means of accomplishment and fortitude, it alone does not create well in a societal/economic standpoint. Because this will in turn create that society to be competitive to the extents of condescension and lack of cooperative acknowledgement.