#factcheckingyourprophet
I have a sometimes healthy, and sometimes unhealthy, interest in the cultural phenomena that emanate from Aleister Crowley. On the positive side of things, it instilled an interest in integrating scientific approaches towards Initiatory pursuits, provided a multicultural education in religious studies and the arts, and ultimately led me to the Temple of Set. It has brought some remarkable people into my life and a handful of dubious recognitions for my understanding despite being someone with no relation to the general Thelemic plan. On the less healthy side, it occasionally pushes into near obsession. I'm an anthropologist by background and the Thelemic movements are ripe as a largely unexplored ethnographic field. Crowley himself drives me a bit crazy for how close he gets to seeing the Setian undertone in what he experienced and then making a 180° turn towards delusion and self-dissolution. So, I keep watching it with occasionally unsavory curiosity to see what new monstrosities it is issuing forth and new confusions it is peddling. For the past few years during the anniversary of the writing of the Book of the Law. I have been in the habit of posting information under the hashtag #factcheckingyourprophet. Crowley did not come to his construction of the Aeon of Horus until nearly a decade after the reception experience in Cairo. After that point, he spent the rest of his life mythologizing what had taken place while redacting a good deal of important information. Usually, I would post factual information about the neteru associated with the Book of the Law to show that they signify beyond Crowley's limited use. This year I am largely letting this go. There seems little profit in trolling Thelemites, as they get more restricted and less capable of integrating outside perspectives. Most of the people who have been my connections to Crowley's legacy are dead or are not long for this world, and have passed what needed to be passed to me for posterity. What information and methods from this that is of value to Setians will in the coming year be entrusted to the relevant Orders. Frankly, it is time for me to leave Beastly things behind while still embracing my role as one of his successors. Mostly though, if you are a Setian with little interest in Crowley but feel for some reason as a Setian you should pursue his material, my basic advice is don't. Dr. Aquino observed in the Scroll of Set #9, #I-9, May 1976 Quote: “The position of the Temple of Set is not that it is a competitor to the A.'.A.'. & O.T.O., but rather that it is their successor [as well as the successor to the Church of Satan]. This implies that we have considered & evaluated what the old organizations had to offer, incorporated the worthwhile material into the Temple, and selectively dispensed with the obsolete and/or inaccurate material.” That was true in 1976. It is even truer today. If what attracted you to the Temple of Set is the clarity provided by the Aeon of Set than little will be gained from muddling your own clarity with a topic of little personal interest. What matters of that legacy already permeates Setian practice free of the personality cultism and tortured syncretism of those movements which consider themselves Thelemic. If you have no personal curiosity about these things, then there is no need to wade into their confusion. That being said fact-checking the mythology around Crowley's legacy may remain important for some Setians who need a shaking from the traps within Thelema. Certainly, on Crowley's Egyptian usage, Geraldine Pinch's A Handbook of Egyptian Mythology will help burst some bubbles. If you really want to go deep on the complexities of the Book of the Law and how it was transformed into Liber AL vel Legis years later Liber AL Vel Legis: The Book of the Law. An Examination of Liber XXXI & Liber CCXX. by Marlene Cornelius provides indispensable information. If you can cut through the self-aggrandizement Liber L. vel Bogus - The Real Confession of Aleister Crowley by Richard T. Cole makes a worthy companion. In the end, you may decide to toss away your Cake of Light and declare that there is at least one part of you that is not of the Gods of Nature.












