Pros & Cons to Social Curation
Being that the course is entitled Gender, Digital Media, and Social Curation, there were many things I did not know about social curation, like what it was for starters. Luckily, we delved into what aspects make content into a social curation and what were some of the negative and positive aspects about it. To begin with, websites such as Tumblr or Pinterest, create the platform for users to share their knowledge on a particular topic across to other users. This idea is essentially the user becoming the expert. By sending information based on your own knowledge on the matter, you can become a well-versed individual and a source others can use. Henry Jenkins coined the term, “prosumer” which is a producer and consumer in one. He explains that fan bases produce content that original creators can use. But the con of social curation would be is the information being presented verifiable and under the rules of research if it evens counts as a proper text? Another con that we discussed was the curation being conducted online still being subjected and structured by social powers, meaning sexuality, gender, race, sex, class, etc. These hierarchical of power still influences the content we see online today. We also question if the content being posted matches oneself both online and offline. We have to create our own feminist narrative of expression online without the expectations of others or by trying to “other” ourselves.
















