#fluffykeldora

[magicallyclueless]

love your art so much! Especially of best mom Robin. She never gets enough love.

i know you sent this ask so, so, so long ago... i have had it in my mailbox intending to make some great robin art in response. i... i can never deliver. it’s been too long. BUT YOUR COMMENT MEANS SO MUCH TO ME I NEVER DELETED IT

here is a fun lil robin!! i hope you’re doing well! I’M SO SORRY FOR ANSWERING SO LATE

[councilofsix]

shaded fullbody commission of holly and lotus for @fluffykeldora! 

if holly can lift entire barns with two arms then she can totally lift lotus with just one!!

art twitter | commissions

[scriptscribbles]

So people are taking Moffat's words out of context yet again in his tag, accusing him of abelism for the Forest of the Night and that he implied Osgood slept with 4. Is there anything that confirms or denies this? I want to submit the link to the post but I don't want to burden you.

I mean, In the Forest of the Night is an old debate, really. Personally, as someone who regularly has to take medication for minor neurological stuff (ADHD, far more minor than anything Maebh had), I didn’t mind it at all. If anything, I kind of identified with it. I hate my medication, a lot of the time. What I take now is better than I used to and it does help me function within the expectations of society, but it does also stifle my mood and creativity a bit. It’s a trade-off. But it is irresponsible, certainly, to tell people who genuinely need medication to survive from mood-influencing or halucination-inducing conditions that medication is a bad thing, because people who are prescribed medication for mental health genuinely do really need it. Personally, I adore that episode, though I can see why the vast majority of people don’t. Either way, it’s not something to do with Moffat, particularly. It’s Frank Cottrell-Boyce who wrote all of that.

The other point, that was Moffat, yeah. It was a bawdy joke in Doctor Who Magazine for how Osgood got the scarf and such, suggesting she knew the Curator intimately. I never got the impression anyone took it seriously, least of all Moffat. And her character certainly was never written as though that were the case.

[markoftheasphodel]

Brigid/Finn for the ship meme?

I got two asks relating to this pairing so let’s take each one in context of its primary game… in this case, FE4 followed by FE5.

1. My take on their canon relationship: OK, aside from the LOL-tastic love point baseline and growth in FE4, they don’t have any dialogue or nothin’. BUT since they have that love point bonanza, it forces one to at least give it a look for funsies, and what Finn has going for him in late Chapter 3 is that he’d be more mature and confident and polished than the kiddo who showed up with Quan in the Prologue and not ridiculously unsuitable for our noble pirate captain. Plus Gen2 gives us a framework of their kids being active in the fight against the Frieges, which is always a plus where Finn is concerned, and we’ve got the possibility of a happy ending. So for FE4 crack pairings there’s a bit to recommend it! Also their colors look nice together and are both reflected in Patty’s outfit.

2. Do I ship them: Yes.

3. Reasons why I do/don’t ship them: Insta-marriage is funny (tho it also works as a meta-reference to the insta-marriage of the main Gen1 couple!) and the kids are cute. Plus some other things I will get into during the following post.

4. Headcanon, if any: So Sigurd sent Finn and Lex up to the peninsula where Brigid’s pirates were running amok to make sure Claude and Tailtiu didn’t get ambushed. This resulted in Lex assisting his old friend Tailtiu, which resulted in an Arthur with terrible MCG and an interesting skill set, but it also led Finn to encounter a golden-haired goddess of the bow who piqued his interest in a way that the ‘suitable’ ladies Ethlyn kept shoving his way never did. And stuff happened.

5. How much do I ship (%): 100%

[agoddamn]

The Fire Emblem tags have been impossible to look into the past few days because of this god awful fan wank. I'm so glad more people are speaking up because it has gotten way too far and I heard some fans are taking it to Twitter and even Reddit. I don't care what games people love or hate, I draw the line at dogpiling innocent people and hate blogs.

It’s all over Twitter and Reddit, yeah. I mostly confine myself to the Heroes Reddit and even that gets the death squads called on you if you daydream about a Fates unit concept. A guy who theorycrafted a Yuugiri concept got hyper shit on and thread derailed into how DARE you want more Fates units you piece of shit. It’s toxic and the fandom is only gonna get more toxic as this keeps up.

[scriptscribbles]

fluffykeldora replied to your post: The TARDIS wiki had an article on pencils. And one...

there’s a zygon porno?

It’s not actually porn. It’s an independently licensed spinoff video about zygons featuring extensive nudity and sex sccenes. But yeah. It’s a thing.

[scriptscribbles]

With that TARDIS Wiki page maybe you could edit the article or bring the topic up in its discussion page. I have no knowledge of how editing a wiki works but I'm sure if you approach them they can listen.

Well, the one with the rhyme is currently editable, but the article on the offending word is locked, so I imagine they would lock that one, too, if one tried to edit it.

Their point of view is that “This wiki does not in any way approve of the use of this word in ordinary speech. However, per policy, we also do not censor the wiki from covering things that actually have been mentioned in DWU stories. Please handle this ugly, incendiary word with maturity and historical interest.”

I think that’s absolute rubbish that comes from a total failure to engage with a story on any real world or critical level and that having an article on the n word, or even using the n word, on a Doctor Who wiki is utterly inexcusable, but such is TARDIS wiki.

One time the moderator quoted above genuinely tried to defend a picture of a penis on the wiki as being relevant as an in-universe information source. TARDIS Data Core is a mess of a wiki.

[markoftheasphodel]

If you don't mind me asking in The Summer Side of Life who is the father of Patty and Febail?

Um…

On the one hand, it’s a surprise for Eyvel when she gets to that point in the story-within-a-story that Finn’s producing. On the other hand…

HERE BE SPOILERS

Chapter 1 indicates Finn is not the biological father of Nanna and therefore not technically related to Leif and Nanna’s daughter and not entitled to claim her as his grandchild. (Eyvel 100% rejects this line of reasoning because of course she would.)

In Chapter 2, Eyvel is surprised by the apparent warm feeling Finn has towards Patty, who is hanging out in Thracia trying to make herself a fine lady and is trying to win over Hannibal’s son.

Chapter 8, the most recent update, says Finn has a daughter who’s looking after his nominal estates in Leonster and has as much experience in governing territory as he does (so, none whatsoever). Eyvel assumes he means Nanna.

He doesn’t, but there’s really no solid protocol for telling your amnesiac wife about the kiddos she’s completely forgotten about, and when that revelation comes it ain’t going over well.

But yeah, Patty is livin’ it up as a duchess and courting a general’s son while her actual parents are playing out a domestic scene in backwater nowhere. And Febail’s ruling Jungby, of course.