Questionnaire: Katya Krupennikova
Katya Krupennikova is a curator at Ujazdowski Zamek (Poland, Warsaw) and an art writer.
1. How have you maintained your practice in your country with its changing economical and political conditions?
I believe, that the dynamics of economical and political conditions is a good catalyser for art environment. I constantly get inspiration in political and social contexts. And it is fascinating for me to work in Moscow for my current exhibition Playing Nature, as Russia proves itself an ultimately complex environment for delivering a critical perspective.
2. If there were an international governing body of contemporary art policy making, what would your concerns be?
I'm not entirely sure, that I understand the role of an 'international governing body of contemporary art policy making', but I'm afraid I can't support globalization or unification in the sphere of culture. However, I see spreading of international knowledge, gathering and sharing information as a strong force to develop awareness and to bring positive change into less advanced territories. That would be great, if there was such an international organization though, which would consist of international jury and would contribute to projects all over the world based on their quality in a local and international level. I see it important for the 'international governing body of contemporary art policy making' to combine the international and the local perspective.
3. To what extent does your government participate in producing contemporary art infrastructures?
Unfortunately I can't speak for Russia here, as I have never received any support from Russian state authorities, opposite - I think it oppresses criticality crucial for art by implementing censorship in social sphere. Speaking of the Netherlands, even after the fierce budget cuts in cultural sphere, contemporary culture is supported on the highest level as an important part of social life of the country.
4. How do you move across different funding systems to produce your projects?
I tend to apply to non-commercial European funds. I'm totally against commercial or private funding, which in my opinion serves the interests of certain brands or personalities. I believe, that this type of funding destroys the whole idea of art as an intellectual and educational practice.
5. If you could work with a local policy maker, what would you desire for the future of contemporary arts funding-give your forecast?
I genuinely think that the best and only way to support contemporary art and culture, is creating international non-commercial funds, which are established to deliver international progress of contemporary art and interested into educational and intellectual function of contemporary art.