Hello. this is a blog where I normally reblog random stuff, keyword on reblog, but I do not post it. This is an important "Do not interact with this person if you dislike this kind of content" though, so I've decided to make this post. I also like a lot checking stupid opinions on the internet sometimes, so I've made an effort on including every reasoning on why his blog isn't a good place for those who fit any of these boxes! You would probably be better off blocking @justrightforme in the case... You are a xenogender user or supporting of those who are You use neopronouns or supporting of those who use them You are a non-binary lesbian/gay or supporting of those who are You use contradicting labels or supporting of those who use them You are a teenager and a system, or supporting of those who are You are trans and don't experience dysphoria or supporting of those who are Are trans and proud, or supporting of those who are You think transmedicalism is wrong. You think the r slur is a slur You are a physical, emotional, psychological, nonhuman/alterhuman or supporting of those who are You are a fictionkin or supporting of those who are Considering something, conceptkins, musickins, etc, are probably also prone to being insulted in that blog. But I have no proof of that due to that blog probably not knowing those. You are polyamorous or supporting of those who are Believe anyone can support women rights, even if they're not always, or fully a woman. (Support as in help them get their rights, not as in respect women or believe they deserve equal rights.) |This sounds a lot worse than it actually is, if you're only blocking because of this, please check this post to see if you actually want to block him| (PLEASE. READ WHAT I SAID. HE IS NOT MISOGYNISTIC. HE BELIEVES IN EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN, HE WON'T CALL HIMSELF A FEMINIST AND SHIT, BUT HE ISN'T MISOGYNISTIC, THIS WAS ABOUT OTHER THING, NOT ABOUT HIM BEING MISOGYNISTIC!!!)
Xenogenders. neopronouns, contradictory labels, nonbinary gays/lesbians... - I could say what he has exactly said about these, but gladly, his old blog is dead, the only proof I have of him being discriminatory of these is that he said that if you identify/use any of those, you should become normal. A teenager and a system... - Claimed that someone was faking because they were a teenager and a system (and also trans "trender", but that's lower here), which means that their hormones are fluctuating a lot and thereforth, fluctuating interests, stances, identities, and more. And also because teenagers are prone to faking mental conditions when they're online. Trans but no dysphoria, trans and proud, transmedicalism... - Claimed that trans people without dysphoria are transtrenders, saying that hatred against them for being trans isn't transphobia, because they're not real trans people. Said that they are are appropiating the trans community, saying it's a choosable, fun thing you should be proud of - In case you focused on the appropiating and choosable part, the reason why that is wrong, is because it implies we can't have gender euphoria and be proud of being trans - - Saying they encourage you to make your condition (being trans), as obvious as possible. (saying it's a condition in itself implies we can't be proud of it, and also, if there was a way to make yourself being seen as trans, why would that be wrong? He said that it was because people will call you your ASAB |Assigned Sex At Birth|, but honestly I hope we can see why that can be stupid. Remember to always stay safe though.) R slur... - He has a post on why the r slur isn't a slur, and that if it was, words like stupid, and idiot would also be slurs. He also constantly uses the r slur as an adjective for anyone who doesn't fall under his views. Such as anyone under the nonbinary umbrella, or trans people who experience gender dysphoria that are supporting of those who don't. Nonhumans/alterhumans... (includes the conceptkin and fictionkin - Says being a therian is only a spiritual thing, and that physical, psychological, emotional, etc therians should be taking their medication, and that their identity is bullshit. Also said that fictionkins' identity is also bullshit because since he believes nonhumanity is only spiritual, he said that you can't be reeincarnated from a fictional character. Which implies he also thinks conceptkins, musickins, 's identities are also bullshit. Polyamorous... - Said romantic love can only include two people, if not, there will be favoritism. That it's basically cheating with a "I love all of you equally" thing!! And apparently that most of them being "conventionally unattractive females with low self-esteem" or "weirdo who wants a harem" doesn't help them!!! Which uh, first of all, where did you get those stadistics from, second of all, so what if someone is conventionally unattractive??? The beauty standard has never helped anyone. Women rights... - This sounds a lot worse than it was meant to be, because I didn't find another way to word it. Anyways, before anything, he specified not being a misogynist or supporting of those who are, which is!!! Nice, at least. But he said that men shouldn't barge in on feminist stuff because it's an "asshat" thing to do??? And also said that trans women shouldn't do it either!! Nor trans men because they are men!!! Oh, he also said something like "Your blog's color palette is gay in a bad way", which would be like a little bit of homophobia, but I don't think most people that will find this post will just block him for being a little bit homophobic, so yeah!!
