like i profoundly don’t relate to the fandom idiom of “i love characters who are losers who suck so bad at everything”…well i don’t…that sounds dull…
seen from Romania
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Russia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Norway

seen from France
like i profoundly don’t relate to the fandom idiom of “i love characters who are losers who suck so bad at everything”…well i don’t…that sounds dull…
bvs: shows you all the exact reasons why this version of batman like all movie versions is unique to himself batman fans: why is he different
One of the many things I am somewhat insane over: Pet and Athelas' contrasting POVs of her decision to banish him from her presence.
Pet on the left, Athelas on the right:
I mean. FIRST of all there's how well they read each other. That Athelas knew she wouldn't stick to it if he really made an effort to change her mind and is now planning to exploit that. SIR. That she knew he wouldn't come back, and he did in fact deliberately bar himself from returning for five years because he didn't trust himself around her.
But then there's the contrast of her motives as discussed in these two places.
You've got Pet's mixed and uncertain "why did I say that? I don't know. Maybe to hurt him. Maybe for his sake." She doesn't know! She doesn't trust herself to know!
And then you get Athelas' POV, and it has quietly picked out the kindest, most compassionate possibility she considered and accepts it as the entire story. His perspective isn't even "she had a right to do it," it's "this came from a place of care and I know it."
Just. augh. the way he believes in her intentions even more than she does. The way that even at his worst and most selfish, in these books, he never thinks the slightest negative thought about her. It's A Lot.
i've lost it already but it turns out that post that says 'i'm not disabled i just have elaborate ways of doing things that take up a lot of energy and end up just approximating what things should be like' is rolling around my brain saying hello HELLO
My opinions on genAI are too complex to write in a snappy tumblr post BUT if my university just, say, updated its AI policy and released its OWN AI PROGRAM
And also values its reputation as an academic and research university (I hope)
And generally wants its student body to do Good Academic Work
Then THIS
Is a WILD thing to say when the AI is supposedly SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STUDENT BODY
"Oh yeah we released a new does-work-in-an-academic-setting machine"
"It's just got a significant error rate and shouldn't be trusted lol"
"lmao"
"Also we're laying off a bunch of staff and instituting budget cuts university wide"
"But tuition's still 50k a semester"
"ppppbpbbptpbpbpbpbpttttt"
I don't mean to deny that there's bad writing around, but I think some of the things denounced as bad or awkward writing are just ... characterization?
Dialogue in particular can be awkward when a character is awkward or at least not much of a people person. Sometimes characters aren't especially articulate or eloquent! That's fine!
There's a point at which it can be jarring or "off" even for the character. Or it can be in-character, but still taken so far that it's (unintentionally) aggravating; generally fiction aims to be somewhat life-like, not documentary. But there's got to be some accommodation of character. They should have distinct voices, after all.
Also, there's something related to this issue of examining lines or dialogue in isolation from context, characterization, etc, I think. It's pretty common and useful to quote characters' dialogue to substantiate some position or another. It's not bad per se, but I think it's important not to be uncritical about it.
Sometimes characters aren't completely self-aware, after all (IMO this should be most of the time, in fact!). Sometimes they're wrong. Something they exaggerate out of guilt or self-aggrandizement or some other reason. Sometimes they flat-out lie.
And I think we sometimes look at dialogue (or even narration) that contradicts something else and are like, look, an inconsistency! Bad! But often, it's because the character was wrong, whether about their own motives or something external to themself. Or lying. That's not necessarily bad writing. Sometimes it's just verisimilitude.
*Wednesday, Enid, Yoko & Bianca walk through the halls of Nevermore*
Wednesday: "Did the teacher say where to meet them? Or do we just walk aimlessly around searching for them?"
Bianca: *looking around*
Yoko: "I can't remember where the teacher said to go"