6/100 days of productivity (interrupted)
very few things in life inspire me as much as studyblr does. i will in fact be studying on an evening
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Norway
seen from Denmark
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from China
6/100 days of productivity (interrupted)
very few things in life inspire me as much as studyblr does. i will in fact be studying on an evening
Oh guys, oh guys oh guys ohguysohguys
I found out a thing yesterday that's making me so very very very excited
And just in case you're the type who'd get excited too and like me two days ago you also don't know this important fact:
The Organization for @transformativeworks (OTW; the parent org of AO3) publishes a peer-reviewed academic journal, completely open-access, i.e. free for you to read
A twice-a-year online-only Gold Open Access peer-reviewed journal focusing on media and fan studies, broadly conceived.
Cancel all my appointments forever this is where I'm going to be for the foreseeable lifetime gfasdafdhfgadgd
This post brought to you by "beardo needs to write a literature review about a certain number of a certain type of peer-reviewed paper, on otherwise whatever topics he likes, vaguely contained inside the concept of of 'library or information services', and yesterday he Found His Topic"
I'm so happy everyone, I'm going to write so many academic papers about fanfiction my lecturers are going to get sick of me 🥹🤩
I am Aziraphale rn
Relatedly, I've also just learnt that Dr Lyn Robinson, co-author of a book that's mandatory reading for like 80% of the courses in the academic programme I'm enrolled in, has published research about AO3. Not only does she seem to be into the same sort of information science stuff that I am, she's also researched fanfiction. She's my new idol
Feeling like the ultimate nerd niche right now. I’m studying information science, specifically cataloguing, while in a library. Immersive experience. Like a 4D movie.
Self-portrait on Lined Notebook Paper, c. 2023
🖇️ 07.03.2026
this week went by so quickly i didn’t even realize today was saturday! it’s been a lot of work and study lately and it’s just the beginning… but i’m glad i found some time to run today, and i ran for a whole hour! something i haven’t done in months haha
LIBRARY USERS OF TUMBLR who are age 35 or younger, are you able to help out a grad student by taking a survey? Your prize will be my eternal gratitude 😔
EDIT: You all are incredible! I have SO MUCH DATA to work with!! ❤️📚❤️ Survey is now closed
Ksenia Coffman’s fellow editors have called her a vandal and a McCarthyist. She just wants them to stop glorifying fascists—and start citing
Coffman navigates over to the Wikipedia article about one of the conspirators—Arthur Nebe, a high-ranking member of the SS. Apart from his role in the plot, Nebe’s main claim to notability is that he came up with the idea of turning vans into mobile gas chambers by piping in exhaust fumes. The article acknowledges both of these facts, along with the detail that Nebe tested his system on the mentally ill. But it also says that he worked to “reduce the atrocities committed,” going so far as to give his bloodthirsty superiors inflated death totals. Coffman will recall that she feels “totally disoriented.” She cannot believe that an innovator in mass murder would have tried to protect the Jews and other supposed subhumans his troops rounded up. She checks the footnotes. The claim is attributed to War of Extermination, a compendium of academic essays originally published in 1995. Coffman knows the book is legit, because she happens to have a copy on loan from the library. When she goes to the cited page, she finds a paragraph that appears to confirm all the Wikipedia article’s wild claims. But then she reads the first sentence of the next paragraph: “This is, of course, nonsense.” The level of bad faith is eye-opening for Coffman. She is “very appalled.” She sees that her confidence in Wikipedia was “very much misplaced.” All it takes to warp historical memory, she realizes, is something this small, achievable for almost anyone with a keyboard. “So few people can have so much impact, it’s a little scary,” she says. She begins to turn a more critical eye to what she sees on Wikipedia. Especially the footnotes.
Emphasis is my own, because it's just so important.
Exercise a healthy skepticism for everything you read.
This goes for any kind of research, not just in Wikipedia. This happens in all kinds of contexts, purposeful or not.
Look at works cited, look at the original source. Make sure you understand the context of whatever you're looking at, be it a photo, a quote, or excerpt.
It may sound laborious, but honestly like anything else, the more you practice the easier it gets. For places like wikipedia with links in citations, it's even easier to track things down.
A works cited section in a wiki article is a great place to start your research, but your research should never end there.
old men yaoi. no this isn't any fandom, these are prominent academics in my field (and the field adjacent). the two in the comic hated each other a lot but those are real quotes or paraphrases that they said about each other. i will not apologize