Ok look. No, look here. At me. Alright. Are you listening?
Intersectional oppression does not refer to an additive property of systems. It is a tool for describing the quality of a person's experiences with systems of oppression. It has nothing to say about the quantity of oppression a person faces or "who has it worse."
The concept was originated by Kimberle Crenshaw. In her legal work, she encountered a case where a Black woman was facing discrimination at work. However, because the treatment this woman faced fit didn't fit the definitions for either racist or sexist discrimination on their own, she lost her court case.
This was because this woman experienced a unique set of barriers and behaviors because she was a Black woman. Not Black + woman, but Back woman. The barriers and behaviors she faced were created by wider systems of racist and sexist oppression, but they came together to create something new.
You with me so far?
This is what we mean when we talk about intersectional oppression and identities. Almost everyone is going to have something about their experience with systemic oppression that is unique, because everyone's circumstances are going to be slightly different. The point of recognizing the fact of intersectional identities and intersectional oppression should be to help us find solidarity with people who share our experiences and understand that people who share parts of our experiences aren't going to share all of our experiences. It should be to help us recognize our own and others' oppression even when it doesn't fit into tidy categories, because there are no tidy categories.













