#javascript difference between two objects

[liquidcrystalsky]

i think javascript is a lot of people's first programming language. i think its okay as a first language, and it's definitely useful as most of everything is on the web. it's god awful though and if you hate it you're entirely correct.

Variables don't have static types or even type hinting. is this variable a number? a string? a boolean? who knows. keep track of it yourself. While this isn't really bad in and of itself, the very low number of types (no distinction between floats and integers) plus the next point makes it really sucky.

Extremely inconsistent coercion and weak typing. 6 + "2" is "62". 6 - "2" is 4. For another example, 0 == "0" is true, 0 == [] is true, but "0" == [] is false.

Hoisting. You can use a variable before it's declared. If you declare a variable anywhere in a scope, it actually declares it right at the beginning of the scope. It feels unneccesary and just causes confusion and could easily be worked around by just writing better code

in other languages, the "this" keyword refers to current object. while in javascript it changes depending on the context

while modern javascript does have classes, they suck to use. I've not done much with it but people complain a lot. The better solution is actually having classes be functions instead (????)

(opinion) it's kinda ugly? like syntactically. unlike other object oriented programs, things can also be just all over the place and hard to follow but still work, rather than requiring things to be nicely organized.

not an issue with the language, but with how people develop for it. I swear to god, NOTHING published to npm has any proper documentation. they give two examples if you're lucky. I just have to trudge through the source code to find out how to use something. which would be nicer if it wasn't for the previous point

just generally, it's very different from other programs and that intuitive sense you can build from others often doesn't apply. Javascript as well lets you just do a bunch of shit that wouldn't work in other languages, possibly causing bad habits to form.

[thegrayascendancy-if]

Sugarcube, flat stats and setter links

As I spent an unspecified time trying to figure it out, maybe it will spare someone the trouble or build towards intuition for how stats work. Or maybe this is bait to see if anyone knows a better solution 😏

First of all, flat stats vs fairmath stats. Fairmath stat accumulation is designed to represent stat gain as inversely relative: the higher your stat value, the smaller your absolute gain would be expressed by the same relative number. E.g. 10% gain at 90 is different from 10% at 15. A bonus (and very important) effect of this is that the stat value increased or decreased via fairmath will never fall below 0 or rise above 100, doing all the stat clamping for you.

Fairmath is easy to test and observe in ChoiceScript, where you can run thousands of tests automatically. You cannot do that in Twine. This is my primary motivation for going with flatmath for my SugarCube project. Which means that someone has to handle clamping, as a gain of 10 at stat value 95 will set the value above 100.

The frequent code for handling that is during change:

<<set $stat to Math.clamp($stat + 5, 0, 100)>>

which, in this example, increases variable $stat by 5 and makes sure the result is not smaller than 0 and not greater than 100: clamping.

My problem with it is how much code repetition is there and how incredibly copy paste error prone this is. You will no doubt be copy pasting this code all over your game files and will need to make sure you are replacing the variable name twice each time, lest one variable will end up with the value of another in an oversight that is way too easy to miss. Ideally we want to specify not only the name of the variable, but also our bounds (0 and 100 respectively) only once.

There are two answers to this problem: widgets and JavaScript. A widget for this is one and done, but it is more fuss to integrate it into code, I found. In the JS solution you would need to figure out a function that works for your variable storage schema.

Let's cover the widget solution first:

<<widget "modify">>     <<print '<<set ' + $args[0] + ' to Math.clamp(' + $args[0] + ' + ' + $args[1] + ', 0, 100)>>'>> <</widget>>

Not only will the above check that each resulting value is within the [0; 100] range, it accepts the variable name as a parameter, meaning it will work for any stat (though you would need to pass the variable name as a String) and for subtraction too:

<<modify "$stat" -18>>

Now to problems. For my links between passages in the format for Twine I use, SugarCube, I strongly prefer the structure of setters:

[[Link text|NextPassageName][stat modifications]]

Calling a widget is not possible inside a setter link though. You would either need to do that in the next passage, which is inconvenient if you do not need that passage for anything else, or to marry two syntaxes in this unholy matrimony:

<<link [[Link text|NextPassageName]]>>   <<set $otherstat to "wowza">>   <<modify "$stat" -18>>   <</link>>

And this is just one link/option.

Now, for the price of extra JS code you can avoid all this. Depending on how you store your game variables, flat or in objects, you can employ tricks to save you time and code lines.

window.modifyStatA = function(value) {     State.variables.StatA = Math.clamp(State.variables.StatA + value, 0, 100); }

This anywhere in your custom JS file for the game will allow to do the following:

[[Link text|NextPassageName][modifyStatA(-18), $otherstat to "wowza"]]

and will change the value of $StatA by subtracting 18 upon clicking that link/option.

You can also do the following:

window.modifyStat = function(statName, value) {     State.variables[statName] = Math.clamp(State.variables[statName] + value, 0, 100); }

which creates a more generic function:

[[Link text|NextPassageName][modifyStat("StatA", -18), $otherstat to "wowza"]]

As you can see, this is suitable for flat stat storage (which I personally do not do). I suppose for the nested stats you could specify the object names as inputs in their order of hierarchy and access them so for a generic function, but I am not sure yet how to do that for a variable number of levels, e.g. Parent.StatGroup.statA vs Parent.statB

I believe this is geared to the very specific way I personally structure my passages and links, so I am ready to be proven wrong 😅

Cheers!

[ars-webtech]

Cross-Platform App Development In Dubai - An Insightful Guide To Follow

In the heart of the United Arab Emirates, the dynamic world of mobile app development is evolving rapidly, and Dubai is at its forefront. This guide delves into the world of cross-platform app development, highlighting its essentials and showcasing leading mobile app development firms in the UAE, like ARS Webtech.

An Insightful Overview About Cross-Platform App Development

Cross-platform app development involves creating mobile applications that run on multiple platforms using a single codebase. This approach contrasts with traditional native app development, which requires writing separate code for each platform, such as Java or Kotlin for Android and Swift or Objective-C for iOS.

Benefits of Cross-Platform App Development By Mobile App Development Companies UAE

Code Reusability: Developers can write and manage code that works across various platforms, reducing development time and effort.

Cost and Time Efficiency: Faster and more economical than developing individual native apps, it simplifies the entire development cycle.

Wider Market Reach: A single app can target different platforms, expanding market reach.

Consistent User Experience: Cross-platform frameworks support maintaining a consistent experience across platforms.

Faster Deployment and Updates: Facilitates simultaneous feature release across all platforms.

Popular Cross-Platform Development Frameworks

Flutter: Known for creating visually appealing apps, it's a strong choice for businesses in Dubai.

React Native: Supported by Facebook, it allows developers to build mobile apps using React and JavaScript, known for its flexibility and seamless integration.

Best Practices In Cross-Platform App Development

Prioritize User Experience: Ensuring apps function flawlessly with an intuitive interface is crucial.

Security Considerations: Especially important in sectors like healthcare and e-commerce, robust security measures are essential.

Scalability: The app should accommodate increased user traffic and additional features as the business grows.

Regular Updates and Maintenance: Ensuring the app remains compatible with the latest operating systems and user expectations.

Integration of Emerging Technologies: Incorporating AI, IoT, 5G connectivity, and machine learning enhances user experiences and contributes to Dubai's smart city initiatives.

Blockchain for Increased Security: Integrating blockchain technologies can add an extra layer of security, particularly in sensitive industries.

Conclusion

Cross-platform app development is a strategic choice for businesses in Dubai looking to maximize their digital presence. Companies like ARS Webtech are at the forefront of this movement, driving innovation and excellence in the mobile app development scene.

FAQs

1. Which frameworks are commonly used for cross-platform app development in Dubai?​

​Flutter and React Native are two prominent frameworks. Flutter is known for its visually stunning apps, while React Native offers flexibility and seamless integration.

2. How do mobile app development companies in Dubai prioritize user experience in cross-platform apps?

User experience is a top priority, ensuring consistent and delightful interfaces across devices.

3. How to choose between Flutter and React Native?

The choice depends on specific project requirements, design preferences, development speed, and existing tech stacks.

For further guidance or to start your cross-platform app development journey, contact ARS Webtech at [phone].

[priya-joshi]

My Perspective on Distinguishing Between Full Stack Developers and Web Developers

I can’t help but go back to my own experience as a web developer as I sit down to write about the difference between full stack developers and web developers. This subject has a special meaning to me since it captures the essence of navigating this fast-paced industry. In order to better appreciate the contrasts between these two jobs, let’s set out on a voyage, and I’ll share my viewpoint and experiences along the way.

We frequently mix the terms “full stack developer” and “web developer” while discussing web development. They stand for several jobs, each with their own set of tasks and abilities. Whether you’re an experienced developer, a newcomer in the industry, or someone pursuing a career in technology, it’s vital to comprehend these contrasts.

Defining Full Stack Developers and Web Developers

Developers who work on the complete stack: Let’s start by defining a full stack developer. In terms of web development, a full stack developer is essentially a jack of all crafts. Both front-end and back-end technologies are familiar to them. This implies that they are capable of managing databases and server-side functionality in addition to designing the user interface. They are essentially the Swiss Army tools of web development.

Web Developers: known as front-end developers — concentrate mostly on the client side of web development. They are masters in using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to create stunning and engaging user interfaces. Their main objective is to provide a smooth and visually pleasing user experience on a website.

I had a basic comprehension of these jobs when I first started working as a web developer. Like many novices, I mistakenly believed that web programming was solely about producing visually stunning websites. But I quickly understood there was much more to it.

Common Ground: Overlapping Skills

It’s important to acknowledge the areas of overlap between web developers and full stack developers before we get into their distinctions. A solid foundation in front-end development is necessary for both professions. HTML, CSS, and JavaScript proficiency are essential. These languages are your building blocks whether you’re creating a user interface or incorporating sophisticated capabilities.

These front-end abilities were the start of my adventure. I devoted endless hours to polishing my HTML structures, honing my CSS stylesheets, and exploring JavaScript’s potential as an interactive language. These abilities laid the foundation for my profession and are still crucial today.

Delving into Full Stack Development

Let’s now explore full stack development, where the distinctions are more apparent. In addition to being experts in front-end technologies, full stack developers are also knowledgeable in back-end technologies. This covers database management as well as server-side programming languages like Python, Ruby, or Node.js.

Making the switch to back-end development was a turning point for me. Working with databases and server logic first made me feel uneasy. I took the challenge, though, and began studying server-side languages and databases. Even if things weren’t always easy, every challenge I overcame helped me become a better developer.

Web Development: Focusing on the Front End

Web developers, on the other hand, focus on the front end. Their area of expertise is designing captivating, engaging user interfaces. They take great care in website design, making sure that it is aesthetically pleasing, responsive, and user-friendly.

I still clearly recall my first front-end-focused web programming project. Making an interactive and practical design come to life was thrilling. Web developers enjoy the particular high of witnessing a beautifully designed website in use.

Bridging the Gap: The Versatility of Full Stack Developers

The capacity to integrate front-end and back-end development is one of the defining traits of full stack engineers. This adaptability is revolutionary in the tech sector. Full stack developers are able to handle all aspects of development, taking a project from inception to conclusion.

Being a full stack developer has provided me with access to a variety of projects. I’ve had the honor of working on anything from data-driven applications to e-commerce websites. This versatility has improved my skill set and given me the ability to take on a variety of difficulties.

My Personal Journey

I can’t help but thank the mentors, classes, and resources that have molded my perspective as I consider my career as a developer. Participating in coding groups, taking full stack developer courses provided by ACTE Institute, and learning from seasoned developers have all been extremely beneficial to my development.

Realizing that no one becomes a full stack developer or web developer over night is essential. It is a path of ongoing learning and development. And keep in mind that each person’s journey is distinctive, formed by their experiences and decisions.

The Ever-Changing Tech Landscape

The only thing that is consistent in the tech sector is change. Both web developers and full stack developers need to keep up with the latest trends and technology. Adaptability is essential, from the emergence of new programming languages to the development of front-end frameworks.

I’ve seen firsthand how quickly tools and techniques for web development have advanced. In this always changing sector, adapting to change and remaining curious have been essential.

In conclusion, anyone navigating the IT sector needs to be aware of the differences between full stack engineers and web developers. Each role has its own advantages and difficulties. Remember that your path as a developer is an ongoing discovery whether you decide to focus on one or embrace the variety of the other.

[angelogistics]

so you want to learn to code? ^w^ epic !! you can always take classes and whatnot, but you can also learn online >w<

if you’re interested in making a game, the first question is do you want to try and create it with a game maker, or with a programming language! game makers will be much easier for those who haven’t programmed, but doing it by yourself gives you much more control over every aspect of the game :}

if you’re looking at making a fairly typical game, or an rpg, or a text based game, and you don’t need many custom mechanics, it might be good to look into gamemakers ! but if you don’t have the money, or you’d like to step outside of the box, here’s where you can get started :D

big big huge biggest question :} what language would you like to learn! there are a ton of different languages, and they’re all useful for different things :D let me introduce you to a couple of common ones! (note: you can learn a language if you like, then move on to a game ide (which might help you understand the overall coding concepts more) or you can go straight to a game ide and learn whatever language it uses, which i think might be more difficult but if you’re only interested in making games, it should b fine!)

html+css+javascript: these are used in tandem for making responsive websites!

python: generally considered a good language for beginners, syntax is very different than java-like languages, tends to not be used for games but some like the sims 4 and doki doki literature club are made in it / use it!

java: the big guns... this can teach you the base for a lot of key programming concepts that are crucial in game making! i also find my knowledge of java to be very translatable to pretty much any coding problems i come across :D java was used to make minecraft, simcity, and more. although it’s certainly not the top choice for game devs, its very similar to the one that most people use ^_^

c++/c#: even though these are languages with different bases, i’m grouping them together because they’re both included in unity :3 these are the guys you want to get to know well if you’re learning games! the syntax is very very similar to java, and c++ is an object oriented language just like java ! the differences between the two come down to things like garbage collection and interpreters, which just means they’re going to feel the same to write in ^_^

Here are some resources for the different languages :}

html+css+js:

https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-programming/html-css

https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-programming/html-css-js

https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-html

python:

https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-python

https://www.learnpython.org/

java:

https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-java

https://www.learnjavaonline.org/

c++/c#:

https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-c-plus-plus

https://www.learncpp.com/

https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-c-sharp

https://dotnet.microsoft.com/learn/csharp

(you’ll notice that most of the places have the same names, codeacademy is a rlly great place to learn all of these languages ^u^)

another incredible resource is youtube! im not going to link videos because i personally haven’t used too many for learning these languages (i read books p much) but finding a tutorial that you vibe with is a really nice way to start, and there’s a lot of great free materials on there!

resources for learning unity:

https://learn.unity.com/

https://www.youtube.com/user/Brackeys

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPV2KyIb3jR5QFsefuO2RlAgWEz6EvVi6

i’m not linking a lot of these because i’m just linking the ones that were the absolute most helpful ones to me, but hopefully these should at least get you started!

i wish y’all luck if you’re learning coding and game making :} it’s hard but its very rewarding! feel free to msg me here if you have any questions or just want to talk abt game stuff ^_^

[morwensteelsheen]

i read a thing today about how the difference between programming/scripting languages can be equated to the difference between different human languages. all languages encompass the breadth of the human experience, but the way in which they do it is different. according to the author, if you wanted to really efficiently pinpoint a new object or concept, you’re better off with german because its precedent for neologisms/combination words is so much better, but if you wanted really flowery, poetic language, you’d be better off with arabic. he likened that to the difference between javascript and python and php, which i thought was really interesting.

anyways because i am an absolute shit for brains i was thinking about how that kind of language optimisation (i guess? sorry to go full tech jargon like two days after starting my new job lol) might work in the context of, uhhhhhh, lotr and all the multilingual families you have in the gondorrim/rohirrim aristocracies. take, for example, potentially the most multilingual family in the canon, the fourth age house of húrin. between éowyn, faramir, and kid(s) you’d have native-acquisition or fluency in:

• the rohirric language

• gondorian sindarin

• westron

then, at least for faramir and kid(s), an academic fluency in:

• quenya

admittedly i have spent almost no time actually reading up on the differences between the languages, but it’s not hard to imagine that there might be some substantive differences between (at least) sindarin and westron, and certainly some cultural idiosyncrasies that differentiate the rohirric language from westron. given all that, im sort of making myself giddy thinking about everybody in emyn arnen just constantly spitting out sentences that are unintelligible to almost anyone else because they’re picking for Best Word Choice instead of Language Consistency. imagining someone starting a sentence in the rohirric language, jumping to sindarin for an especially flowery term, but using westron syntax. very cute???? i think!!!

okay goodnight bye

[brainiuminfotech]

Xamarin Vs React Native: Choose the Right Platform For Your Business

Mobile phones are used by 5.22 billion people, while 4.66 billion people have access to the internet. The rush to develop innovative apps based on new concepts is greater than ever. Businesses of all sizes have set aside funds to develop the most relevant mobile applications to meet the demands and preferences of their consumers. React Native and Xamarin are presently dominating the scene, according to those who monitor the mobile app development industry's trends.

The developer community prefers both of these open source cross-platform frameworks for developing high-performing apps with minimal coding effort and time. Several businesses have made it a prerequisite to hire mobile app developers who know how to write code that works on both iOS and Android. It's no surprise that these frameworks have become quite popular.

When asked which of these two titans has the upper hand in the sector, however, individuals rarely have an answer. Both React Native and Xamarin have their own set of benefits and drawbacks, making it tough to choose between the two.

Today, we'll go over some major aspects that highlight the differences between React Native and Xamarin. But before that, let’s look at their individual characteristics. Let’s go

What is Xamarin?

Xamarin is an open-source platform for .NET developers, similar to React Native. The fundamental purpose of Xamarin is to keep shared code and platform code in communication. The ability of Xamarin to enhance the capabilities of the .NET developer platform with platform-independent tools and frameworks distinguishes it as a unique framework for app development.

Furthermore, Xamarin may take advantage of the entire functionality of the underlying platform. This means that when the app runs on Android, it will take advantage of platform-specific features to deliver the desired user experience. The same can be said for an app that runs on iOS devices. Its ability to take use of the hardware acceleration capabilities of the underlying platform is also due to Xamarin's ability to offer the necessary performance.

Benefits:

Below are some of the benefits of Xamarin:

Xamarin is an ecosystem of built-in technology that enables Xamarin developers to create cross-platform apps in a single step. Developers may reuse 96 percent of this code when using the C# language and the .NET framework. Building apps for all platforms necessitates the use of three technologies: C#, .NET, and Visual Studio.

Xamarin applications are designed to operate on a variety of platforms, yet they share a similar code base. Aside from that, their business logic, database access, and network connectivity are all the same. The developer's only responsibilities are to make improvements to the user interface. This is necessary to ensure that each platform retains its original feel and appearance. In the development world, Xamarin is recognized for providing a highly native but simple application performance. Xamarin has unrivalled performance as compared to other cross-platform programming tools. The picture loading performance of a native platform is just 14 percent quicker than Xamarin when compared to native application development and rendering.

Using Xamarin, you can create a fantastic user experience. It's a collection of standardized interface components and pieces with 100% reuse code. Developers may utilize the built-in Xamarin to change the components from either  Xamarin or iOS or Xamarin. Android to make the needed modifications.

Even for the most popular components, Xamarin did not have a large number of libraries available to developers initially. However, Microsoft's development team heeded this request and created ready-to-use components for typical scenarios and use cases.

Having read about Xamarin and it’s benefits, let’s see what React Native has to offer us.

What is React Native?

React Native is an open-source framework built and introduced by Facebook in 2015. It is based on JavaScript and JSX. The goal is to create native apps for both iOS and Android devices.

The React Native framework uses JSX, which is an amalgamation of XML-Esque Markup. React renders to the native platform of the device on which the app is executing.

This ensures that the app performs similar to those created with a native app development framework such as Java for Android or Objective-C for iOS. As they have a common code base, React Native mobile app development enables the creation of platform-specific versions of components that can be shared across platforms. React Native is used to create mobile apps such as Facebook, Walmart, Bloomberg, and Instagram.

Benefits:

Following are some of the benefits of React Native:

Developers built React Native, and they continue to support it with the same zeal. For this incredible community support, there has been a revolution in React Native mobile app development. The community generously distributes its vast expertise, and everyone gets free access to a plethora of free components for mobile app creation.

With live and hot reloading, React Native mobile app development improves itself. Both of these qualities are complementary, yet there is a significant difference between them. The framework can compile and read the changes performed by the developer in real time thanks to live reloading. When sending a new file to the simulator, the complete file is read from the beginning and the changes are updated. The goal of hot reloading is to test the application's modifications without actually reloading it.

React Native is the go-to solution for developers looking to save money because 90% of the code can be reused to build iOS and Android apps. Working with React Native saves a lot of time because it just requires small changes to add nativity and minor changes to create performant applications.

The React Native application developers may render the application for third-party support using the JavaScript-powered framework. Because React Native does not have all of its components in one place, it makes use of native and JavaScript modules to improve the application's functionality. Third-party modules may be used to integrate features like maps and two-factor authentication to the app.

The frameworks chosen to develop an application have a direct impact on its performance and capacity to deliver a better client experience. As React Native makes use of native modules and components to assist developers in creating a working application, it is possible to generate code for native APIs without causing any issues. As a result, performance-centric apps may be developed at reduced costs and in record time.

Now that we have some in-depth information about the two platforms, let’s do a comparative study between the two to help web developers choose the right platform.

Xamarin Vs React Native:

Direct comparisons are usually the most effective approach to choose between two options. Let’s have a look.

Performance: This area is critical to your ultimate selection because cross-platform and hybrid frameworks are renowned for sacrificing performance for convenience. Though both Xamarin and React Native provide near-native performance, Xamarin is faster on Android and iOS and provides a UI for utilizing native tools.

Popularity: Although popularity does not necessarily define the worth of software, it does have a significant impact on how other people engage with it. The popularity of the software is frequently associated with characteristics like a big skill pool, thorough tooling, and a vibrant community. React Native is more popular than Xamarin, maybe because it is open-source whereas Xamarin is closed-source and exclusively supported by Microsoft. This is evident in everything from Stack Overflow insights to Google Trends.

Community And Developer Ecosystem: You may expect React Native to have a larger and more supportive community than Xamarin for the same reasons mentioned above. React Native's community was small when it first started. However, as the framework develops in popularity and JavaScript frameworks in general gain in popularity, spotting other React Native developers has gotten simpler and easier.

Development Environment: Pre-built components are available in both Xamarin and React Native to improve speed and the developer experience. Despite the live reload functionality of React Native, the technology as a whole pales in contrast to Xamarin. Xamarin. Forms and  Xamarin.iOS as well as Xamarin.Android  gives developers the ability to design native UI components that are particular to the platform. Xamarin developers may get native-like performance in this method, which React Native developers may not be able to do.

Availability: The majority of open-source frameworks are free to use. Xamarin, on the other hand, is unable to claim that title. There is a free version of Xamarin, however it has restricted functionality. In general, more access equals more freedom, therefore React Native has the upper hand in this category.

Compilation: Just-in-time (JIT) compilation is used by JavaScript and its frameworks, notably React Native. Despite the fact that compiled languages are quicker than interpreted languages because they are translated to machine code before execution, JIT compilation may offer the best of both worlds. JIT compilation is used by JavaScript, Java, and C#. However, React Native's JIT compilation only works on Android, not iOS, causing performance issues for iOS apps. Both JIT and ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation are available in C#. In most situations, AOT compiled code runs quicker. Xamarin vs. React Native demonstrates that both frameworks have identical compilation techniques, but Xamarin has a compiler that works well on both iOS and Android.

Expense: Xamarin and React Native are both free to download. However, Xamarin is only available for free to individuals and small businesses. This, of course, makes React Native, which is completely free, much more enticing.

Wrap Up:

Finally, we can conclude that both React Native and Xamarin are robust frameworks that can be utilized to create high-quality apps. Both have advantages and disadvantages, and only you can choose which is the greatest match for your next project. For better results, hire professional mobile app developers as they can assist you in determining the best platform for the success of your project.

[orionesolutions1]

REACT NATIVE VS IONIC: CHOOSE THE RIGHT ONE IN 2021

REACT NATIVE VS IONIC: CHOOSE THE RIGHT ONE IN 2021

The “hybrid vs native” question still lingers among programmers and coders. In 2021, the choice is between React Native and Ionic, the two biggest players in the mobile app development frameworks market. According to AppBrain,

Ionic is the most used in app development at 3% while React Native is at 1.3%.

Market share in terms of app installs show 4.05% for React Native and 0.27% for Ionic.

To understand this stat, let us look at the difference between a native app and a hybrid app.

NATIVE VS HYBRID

Native and hybrid apps differ in many ways including UX, performance, technology used, features, and associated costs.

Hybrid Mobile Apps

The underlying tech in hybrid apps are HTML, CSS, JavaScript and other web technologies. WebView is the platform that they all run on. Through native modules and plugins, they can be developed as Single Page Apps or Progressive Web Apps.

Native Mobile Apps

Platform specific UI components are needed to run native mobile apps. Java for Android and Objective-Cor Swift for iOS are used to build these apps. They cannot be reused between platforms and there are about no drawbacks to the efficiency of these apps.

Now, with a surface understanding of native and hybrid mobile apps, let us know a little bit about React Native and Ionic development.

REACT NATIVE

React Native is a JavaScript based framework. It helps create native mobile apps and is supported by a huge community of developers. The corporate backing comes from Facebook. It uses the “learn once, write everywhere” principle. Facebook, Oculus, Coinbase, Shopify, Tableau, FlipKart, Discord, NerdWallet, Skype, Bloomnerg, Tesla, and Wix among many others use the React Native framework.

IONIC

With a shared codebase between mobile, web, and desktop apps, Ionic is a hybrid development framework for web apps. Ionic is rich in features and much more capable than web apps since it uses Cordova and PhoneGap to access native features. Ionic follows the “write once, use everywhere” principle. The Ionic framework has been used by MarketWatch, Pacifica, Sworkit, Diesel,StockPlan Connect, Honeyfi, McLaren, JustWatch, mcDonald’s, Untappd, Nationwide, and Cryptochange among a plethora of others. According to Ionic, over 5 Million apps have been created using its framework.

Now let us take a quick look at how the Ionic framework and the React Native framework compares against each other and determine the best one for 2021.

IONIC VS REACT

The Tech

React uses features that are native to the UI. This is what gives it the aesthetics of a native application. The native form also allows the developers to give a seamless experience to the end user.

Ionic uses web tech. This enables it to achieve multi-platform applications. It is based on Angular JS and uses the code base in a minimal fashion. Angular enables Ionic to have a smoother process and be extremely user-friendly.

Performance

React demands the developers to make platform-specific changes to achieve the most efficient components. React Native has a much more stable framework. This makes it efficient for large scale projects with higher budgets. The framework also enhances responsiveness and detailing of the UI. On the other hand, Ionic’s hybrid approach makes it much more convenient for prototyping or facilitating an urgent requirement. Using CSS, JavaScript and HTML5 components, Ionic enables faster app development but the user might be asked to download additional plugins to enable the native features.

Coding

As discussed earlier, React uses the “learn once, write everywhere” logic. This framework will suggest suitable components that respect the native aesthetics, to the developers.

Contrary to that, Ionic can run the same code across all platforms. It adapts to the platform and learns its behavior in order to provide the native aesthetics.

Apart from these differences, React native has a community of 1752 contributors while Ionic has just 268. And in order to pinpoint the better one for 2021, we need to understand the benefits and drawbacks of both Ionic and React Native.

ADVANTAGES OF IONIC

Open source

Easy to learn

Built in components

Speed development cycle

Familiar development environment

Cordova and PhoneGap wrapping

DISADVANTAGES OF IONIC

Requires WebView

Apache Cordova required to access hardware functionality

Slight performance issues

ADVANTAGES OF REACT NATIVE

Stable and reliable for large scale projects

Android, iOS and Windows app code reusability.

Codes are not dependent on the platforms

Vast community

DISADVANTAGES OF REACT NATIVE

Require native development skills.

Lack of custom modules

Slight debugging and compatibility issues.

Now that we have laid down the facts and figures, let us conclude by determining if one is above the other.

SUMMING UP

The choice will be largely influenced by the type of project you are undertaking, the time of development, and the skills garnered by the team. According to a popularity survey by Ionic,

86% of web developers have used Ionic and 16% went for React Native.

To build PWAs, 72% preferred Ionic while 21% picked React Native.

On GitHub, Ionic has 41,000 stars and React Native has 89,100 stars.

These statistics boil down to the fact that it is not feasible to put one over the other objectively. We can conclude by understanding that if the requirement is a low budget, high performance app in a limited time, Ionic is the better one and if the requirement is a high budget, large scale app, React Native is the better one, for 2021. At Orion, we specialize and deliver excellence in both.