In the previous class the discussion moved onto Canadian public art/sculpture...and the controversy it is often associated with. In particular is artists such as Robert Hendrick, Anne Kahane, Micah Lexier, and Eric Fischl...
Also mentioned was Canadian artist John McEwan, whose work we are all familiar with as it stands outside of the Owens art gallery. I did a seminar/ presentation project on Earthworks in a course this semester (Cultural Ecology)...I was researching the 2008 Sculpture Sackville project that was an outdoor sculpture installation project that took place all over Sackville (focusing on Waterfowl Park) during that summer. As I was researching the project I came across a catalog for another Canadian environmental art show which included the work of McEwan , whose style I recognized from the discussion in class...What I like most about his work is the fact that it often puts considerably "wild" subject matter (shadows or outlines of it, made from manually manufactured/ processed) into a variety of settings, whether they be more natural or urban...His art holds a strong sense of power in its strong use of imagery and symbols.
In terms of the other artists discussed in this class, or those listed above, I feel like I am captivated most by the work of Eric Fischl. I can definitely understand why his work would be "considered" as controversial...obviously because of the subject matter, and the fact that hidden aspects of the human experience are accentuated/ focused on within his work, that is the human body is depicted in a realistic, unflattering, and unideal way...which breaks the norm of what the typical audience is used to...Of course now I think we are becoming more and more desensitized to such factors...factors that break the norm in terms of sexuality or violence...In a way I think it's good that subjects such as sexuality can be talked about or learned about more openly...however there is a line in which things tend to loose their meaning...It's hard to know where the line is drawn, how things have changed, what should be considered as "appropriate"...or whether anything really should...Ultimately thought I think the power of Fischl's work lies in his ability to capture such emotion in his work...his figures seem to completely embody a sense of emotion that is palpable even by just seeing a photograph of it...