#malefems

[siryouarebeingmocked]

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Some idiot somewhere: The term "simp" is sexist, because it objectifies the woman- 

Me (reading): Yeah, I should've seen this coming. 

Me: It's exactly the opposite. The term is used to criticize men for idolizing women, especially men who have parasocial relationships with OnlyFans models, or camgirls, for instance. 

Have you ever looked at what someone is saying, and realized they started from "this makes me uncomfy" and worked backward to figure out why it's "wrong"?

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Me: Huh. I remember one webcomic drawn and written by a male feminist. Me: Art was good, but the writing was bad, and his politics were worse.

Me: I wonder what he's up to now.

Google: Here's his twitter. Palestine flag in the display name. Me: Of course.

Google: Also, he now identifies as a she.

Me:

Me: ...Of course.

Seriously, if I didn't know, I'd assume the posted selfies were some random hot e-girl in a wig.

...A wig that looks an awful lot like the main character of the webcomic.

Wait, I know people said the main character was a Mary Sue wish fulfillment waifu, but maybe she was a self-insert all along.

It would explain...a lot of things.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I found this when I stumbled across a podcast episode on it. I have not listened to it; https://wethefifth.substack.com/p/373-notes-on-white-privilege-w-adam#details

[siryouarebeingmocked]

So apparently TakedownMRAs, that ol’ liar, claimed MRAs are hanging out with TERFs.

https://www.tumblr.com/generalchelseamayhem/707373524711555072

Because if there’s anything radical feminists love, it’s people who talk about men’s issues and are famously critical of feminism. /s

Also, amusing note;

Let’s ignore the paper-thin pretense that TMRAs actually cares about men’s issues as anything more than a rhetorical club to attack MRAs.

He says MRAs - who talk about non-white, non-European men all the time, and who use a falsely rape-accused black guy as one of their biggest examples of injustice, who talk about how Indian women’s activists kept the government from making sexual assault laws gender-neutral - actually have “deep ties to white supremacy”.

I’d go looking for his “evidence”, but I’m afraid it would be the logical equivalent of a logic bomb to a sci-fi computer. Like “this sentence is false”. But I did find this, from 2020;

That’s right. This genius endorses feminist terrorism.

This isn’t the first time Mexican feminists have tried firebombing cops and government buildings.

Apparently it makes sense to tMRAs to for Mexican women to try and burn completely unrelated people alive in the name of fighting ‘femicide’, or for abortion rights, or both, even when there’s no evidence gender or sex was part of the motive for a woman’s murder or abuse*. 

And most murdered people South of the border are still men, of course .

And for bonus points, the feminist apparently threw short. She bombed other feminists. 

*European feminists do the same thing.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

So, I was watching an LP.

One of the commentators started talking about the game Front Mission: Gun Hazard. He said the hero was out to save his kidnapped girlfriend because of "masculinity". 

Ah, yes, trying to protect someone you love is totally about masculinity. 

And not, y'know, caring about those people.*

Also, the second after I wrote that, I hit play on the video. The LP’s main host joked that the co-host has a “whiteboard the size of four men” in his office.

Co-host says “the problem with that is that some idiot is going to go ‘not all men!’”

That...that wasn’t even relevant. 

Or funny.

So, yeah, I skipped to the next episode.

* It’s also a tad ironic that mainstream feminism tells men that the way to be good “allies” and malefems is...protecting and supporting women. 

Except feminists usually sell the idea like mainstream men aren’t supposed to protect women anyway.

So apparently it’s wrong for a man to protect a woman he cares for personally, but just fine for him to protect women collectively, especially if they’re feminists.

How is this fighting sexism again?

[siryouarebeingmocked]

How nice of this brave, brave male feminist to speak for offended women who totally exist.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

"I don't like these stereotypes of men. Clearly they're the fault of [other stereotype of men]!"

You don't even care about the gendered stereotyping of men, just the fact that feminism might be demeaned. In fact, you're buying into the idea that men who can't get laid are worth less, which is, commonly, used against white knights.

The problem people have with malefems aka white knights aka simps isn't the part where they respect wahmen, it's the idea that they

a) are performatively woke b) are sexist against other men (and often women too) c) are predators in disguise using feminism as cover d) are some combination of the above.

Notice the irony? OP had a problem with "white knight" and "simp" stereotypes, but has no problem blaming the two terms on "incels", even though the term is clearly not just used by incels.

"people who stand up for women no matter the circumstance." includes people who stand up for women even when there's no reason to, and people who take it to an extreme, and people who assume the women need the help.

“There's no circumstance where standing up for a woman is the wrong thing to do” is kinda telling on yourself.

And, of course, he(?) blocked Mr-Adaar after a totally not upset response which is now deleted.