Actors don't need to agree or like a ship but I wish they would think about how their words can be used to attack shippers. I just wanna ship my ship in peace.

seen from Türkiye
seen from South Africa
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States
Actors don't need to agree or like a ship but I wish they would think about how their words can be used to attack shippers. I just wanna ship my ship in peace.
Tomorrow
Tomorrow I tell my mother it's either her boyfriend or me and outline why I don't feel comfortable around him. Boy I'm anxious.
shaloved30 replied to your chat: Someone make sense of this for me please.
we need something for tom to do cause we want him here so his characters say and do what the fuck ever and every character has to roll with it
This is the truth, Sha. I appreciate many things about Tom, but HR is basically ‘we have no plot or reason for you, Tom, so just go nuts for ten minutes of screen time an episode’, which is a disaster. And trying to legitimize him with things like this museum?
It would be SO MUCH EASIER to just bring Harry back. They can say Jesse had to stay behind and guard her own city on her own earth if they don’t want to have three Flashes around. Give Harry some science-speak ‘project’ he needs to be on Earth One to do, that’s all the explanation you need. I mean I hated Harry at various points last season, but compared to HR? I miss Harry so much.
And it’s weird, but Harry and Cisco’s relationship was a big deal for a lot of people, even getting write-ups in reviews and TV Guide and things like that. But it’s like the writers have completely misconstrued why people liked it. ‘Oh, we just need Tom and Carlos to argue and people are on board!’ So they give us this.
Whew. Sorry to vent.
A NEW report from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) shows that public opinion on ...
...on immigration is more negative in disadvantaged areas. The study is based on a survey of over 1,200 people in 2023 along with data from the 2022 Census. Researchers suggest that fears about pressure on national services and crime are driving sentiment on the issue. Despite public concerns, the ESRI found no direct link between local shortages in healthcare, housing, or education and negative views toward immigration. Using indicators like the number of general practitioners per household and housing affordability, the study concluded that attitudes are influenced more by perception than by local experience. Geography also plays a role. People living in rural areas tend to have more negative attitudes toward immigration than those in urban centres. However, rural communities with higher proportions of migrants expressed similar attitudes to urban areas, pointing to the impact of everyday social contact in shaping views.
continue reading