My Failed First Attempt At An Open Borders Research Paper - With A Superfluity of Self-Referential Whatnot
Borders, why aren’t they open? Borders, why aren’t they closed? Who opens the border? Aren’t borders by nature closed? If a border is not closed, it can’t possibly be a border. Imagine a circle. It is enclosed by a line that makes the shape of a circle. If a section of that line was opened, it would no longer be a circle. This kind of hyper-literal ratiocination where if the line of a circle [i.e. a nation] is interrupted tis no longer a nation plaques discourse within the rationally ignorant crowd such as myself (the average IQ, credulous, nominally educated folk). Albeit, in regards to my own psychographic on an ideological level; a more anarchic yet confused ideologically psychographic. We have a certain fondness for abandoning that circle [i.e. the nation] for something else entirely. Ideally a something else that is voluntary and mimics mycelium where individuals are incentivized to go through a sort of epigenesis where a spore i.e an individual goes through cellular differentiation [See: Wikipedia (2019): “the process where a cell changes from one cell type to another. Usually, the cell changes to a more specialized type”] i.e an individual can grow from a tabula rasa into a sweetie pie where they partake in tissues, organs, organ systems, and bodies i.e where they partake in families, local municipalities, voluntary associations, syndicates, labor unions, states, countries, and the world. Usually, people would change where their aptitudes would best suit them, but perhaps in a more technological egalitarian society, all people could be able to develop and learn more easily through services such as Neuralink or the internet. Perhaps in a world without nation-states, there would be some sort of federation of voluntary communities such as what anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho-pacifism, anarcho-socialism, agorism, anarcho-transhumanism, anarcho-communism, could provide. Mayhaps all these voluntary organizations could begin to work in tandem under some sort of open borders agreement. Thence supplanting government’s role as people organizers into something more akin to musical genres, linux distributions, and personal taste preferences. Where everything is consensual. Rather than the traditional rulership ranging from a single person ruling, to a minority, to at best a majority ruling; where everything is non-consensual, and at best everything tis mostly consensual; with minority outlier likely being oppressed. Thence I suggest a more decentralized system of people organization where individuals could decide on their own in which system they want to partake. Thence creating a world that would lack non-consensual organizations & people would be free to choose what systems they would wish to live under.
As you can (clearly) see trying to interpret my uniform fantasies of breaking the circle that is the government; influenced by Woodstockian hippies, classical liberals, socialists, anarchists, and a desire to make everybody happy wouldst be an act of moromancy [divination via the interpretation of foolishness].
