Now, my one personal critique is that I feel Morpheus takes a few liberties when it comes to facts and their opinions/theories on different subjects. That is NOT to say that they do not present a well researched argument because they absolutely do, I just think that in a few instances throughout the book their own opinions or views overshadow alternative interpretations or emphases. An example, in the discussions on prophetic practice it is framed in a way that implies (in my opinion) that the Irish only experienced prophetic inspiration via dreams/sleep trances (again this is all backed up by solid research and information) but then goes on in the very next section to discuss Fedelma while neglecting to add that Fedelma's prophecy was given while apparently wide awake and without ceremony, implying additional ways which prophetic inspiration could be achieved. These are admittedly small, personal, nitpicky critiques, but they affected me so it felt necessary to note.