#my though

[beyourselfchulanmaria]

喜歡，不等同全然接受。

其實，誰喜歡你，誰不喜歡你，這是屬於"感覺"。 感覺是欲望的開端，也可說是最泛泛的一種"意念"； 而感覺，是最不忠貞的，說實話。lol (sorry I laugh but seriously.)

所以，要學會不被他人的感覺駕馭， 也不被自己的"感覺"桎梏你的思想和心靈。 跨越了感覺，才能觸及真實的情感， 進而才生愛。

ps. 先問問自己的心，求取他人認同是徒勞的。

Chu Lan

12. 02. 2023

[thranduilswifesblog]

It's almost midnight, and I used to listening to random songs 30 minutes before go to bed. And after a very long time, suddenly I'm in the mood to listening to this song again. I remember I listening this song when it came out and turned out this song is GOT's unused soundtrack.

But instead of GOT, why I feel this song really suit Turgon and the fall of gondolin. Like "Gloria Regali, peace and understanding. Forever may you reign" 😭 like it's just him!! This song made for him and Gondolin!! 😭

And then this one.... This one is literally suit for the house of Finwë and Fëanorean 😭

Please whoever will gonna bring the 1st age materials to the live action, can you just use this song? 😭

[retracexcviii]

The abyss thing

One person had doubts about the abyss and I tried to collect all the information I had to explain it and well... this was born XD

Before reading you should know this is my own interpretation of the abyss, other people can explain this their own way. As long as you understand your own idea you dont need this but I wanted to share it since I have found a lot of people lost in Pandora Hearts

Hope you enjoy!

If you want to tell me something about this, don't have a problem writing me. And if you want to share your own idea about this I would love to read it <3

[dabsper]

About the Lapis/Jaspis Fandom

Please, before begin to read, note that this is a safe place here, and I'm only giving my point of view. I don't like Lapis Lazuli, but I don't hate Jaspis or Lapis Fandom.

I appreciate seeing healthy relationship Jaspis. But not the dark side content.

You see, I'm a huge fan of Jasper. So, it probably show me as an "ABUSOR FAN".

The fact is, no. I'm not supporting any abuse content.

I'm avoiding them. But I need to talk about my feeling about the Lapis/Jaspis Fandom.

But I repeat. This is my point of view.

So, we have both Jasper and Lapis. Both are traumatized and survivor of something.

They both hurt.

They both angry.

They both need to extract their feeling.

And it's okay. It's okay to vent. It's okay to being alright. It's okay to not being able to fully communicate when you're hurt.

But... I just... Don't understand, how can people enjoy Lapis being the cute little innocent cutipie, while it have been revealed she'd abused Jasper under water.

Hey, remember, safe place, no hate.

I don't understand why people still writing or drawing Jasper as a bad person who abuse and rape the innocent Lapis. I don't understand this part of the Fandom.

And yeah, I know Jasper is not all innocent. She'd done wrong things too. She had her responsibility too. Jasper isn't all innocent too.

They both done bad things.

But Lapis more than Jasper.

And I just want to understand why people still send hate to people who love Jasper.

I want to understand why people portray Jasper as a rapists over Lapis.

I want to understand why Lapis is the only one innocent while Jasper is the bad guy.

I want to understand why Lapis is the only one to be loved by the Fandom.

I want to understand why Jaspis content is 90% of the time Jasper being Lapis abusor.

Yeah, I understand people appreciate Lapis.

But I don't.

I find her character bad writed and I don't accept that she's suddenly a CG. It's not fair.

She didn't had a redemption arc.

Peridot had one. We saw her learning about earth, about friendships and concept she wasn't supposed to know.

But we haven't see Lapis redemption arc. She just, popped and suddenly became friend with Peridot and everything was okay.

And it's not okay for me.

Yeah, I understand. Lapis was full of trauma and hate. Yeah she is ill. Yeah I understand that.

But because you are ill disent excuse you from hurting other people.

And please, don't start with the "if you're a survivor you will understand her."

I'm an abuse survivor. And I'm mentally ill. And I've never done something like Lapis. I've never hurt people when I was in a bad mood or upset.

And Lapis did.

And it's not right.

And I don't appreciate Lapis because of that.

Thanks for reading this. I needed to speak about this. Again, this is a safe place, no hate please. This is my right to don't appreciate a character. But I don't dislike Jaspis or Lapis Fandom. It's just the character of Lapis that I don't like. Not the people who like her.

I'm fully open to discuss with you about this.

In an intelligent and respectful discussion.

[neglectedrainbow]

the fact that beyoncé not only posted 6! pictures of her attending dear evan hansen on broadway on instagram (including the pic of her and ben platt AND a video of ben riffing part of her song "bootylicious"!!!) BUT ALSO that all of her 106 MILLION FOLLOWERS are commenting on said post with things like "that boy [ben platt] can sing!" and "i definitely need to check out this musical now" and "listening to that show's soundtrack right now! loving it!" is just....so wonderful, i'm so happy

[xxbehindthemaskxx]

DAMNNNN-- THE CLASS IS LIKE A FLIPPIN’ FAMILY!!-

I swear if after this the Art Kid’s start to act like a true family, I’m gonna flip-

Marinette is such a fierce leader with a momma instict and Adrien is the dada of class-- or Nino is the dada?- I meant- he was the one who demanding Adrien’s father to let him pull a party for his best bro--

Also- Julerose for life.

[power-of-worlds]

Superhero Movies: Thor

I want to say out front: the following are my opinions regarding the Thor films. That’s all. They’re not absolute. I’m going to say stuff that’s contrary to the general consensus, particularly regarding Thor: Ragnarok. You may disagree with me; in fact, I fully expect and welcome it. Fiction is heavily subjective; there’s no objective “this is good, this is bad”. We all have our own ideas about this stuff. There’s no reason for hostility just because someone disagrees with you. Be respectful and courteous.

That said, I really feel like I have an idea for future Thor movies that can fully fit within what’s been established for Thor throughout the MCU thus far. I wouldn’t write this if I didn’t. I hope you’ll consider it, even if you disagree.

Well, now that that’s out of the way, spoilers below the break for all three Thor movies, as well as all the Avengers movies as of Avengers: Infinity War.

I’ll be honest: I watched Thor: Ragnarok and thought, “What did I just watch?” I disagree with making Thor a comedic character; to me, it drastically and abruptly changes Thor’s character as previously established in the MCU.

Related to that, I also thought that making Thor: Ragnarok a comedy detracted from Thor’s arc as established in his solo films. Thor was moving towards accepting responsibility and becoming king of Asgard, something he had rejected over the past two movies. It was serious and carried weight for the character. Thor may have become king of Asgard in Thor: Ragnarok, but I didn’t feel it was earned or given the weight it needed, especially if you’re then going to kill off a bunch of the Asgardians in Avengers: Infinity War.

But so it goes. As I said earlier, I think this new comedic bent to Thor can be combined with the subject matter of the first two movies (and maybe even some of the comics) without being too jarring.

At the core, I think Thor movies should draw further on Norse mythology. There’s plenty of creatures, locations, and characters to draw on for inspiration. It’s something that sets Thor apart from a lot of the other MCU characters, and I think it’s something to lean on. While some of those characters are dead in the films, it would be easy to say that the gods are reborn; it’s established in the comics, and I doubt anyone would really find it terribly surprising. Establish Ragnarok as a cyclical event that’s happened before, albeit in different ways, and you can constantly tell new Thor stories.

Thor stories, whether in the comics or in the first two movies, draw on conflicts between family members. Loki has, at least in the comics, been downright cutthroat at times. Alas, Loki is dead as of Avengers: Infinity War, Frigga is dead as of Thor: The Dark World, and Odin is dead as of Thor: Ragnarok. But I don’t think that should deter us from a Game of Thrones-style “struggle for the throne” sort of story. As established above, it would be easy to bring back those deceased characters. Even if you didn’t take that path, Enchantress could make a great, more cerebral villain than we’ve really gotten in a Thor movie before.

Lastly, go ahead and lean into the cosmic nature of Thor stories. Have him go to various planets and fight big, imposing bad guys. That’s part of the fun of Thor: he’s a god. He can go toe-to-toe with much bigger people.

All of this can be accomplished while still having Thor be the comedic character established in Thor: Ragnarok. My only advice on that front would be, don’t undermine your serious moments with jokes. Let the heavy stuff hang there. Propping it up with a joke reduces the impact of those moments. Comedies can still have those serious, deep moments without including humor in them. 

Oh, and go for jokes that reward the audience for paying attention instead of being blatant “laugh now” moments. When the Grandmaster had Thor captured in Thor: Ragnarok and Thor summoned a few tiny bolts of lightning between his fingers, I actually thought that was funny. It acknowledged that Thor appears not to have any actual thunder powers despite being called the god of thunder. (The fact that Jeff Goldblum delivered the joke also helped, but alas, not every film can make use of him.)

So, in summary: I think that a Game of Thrones-style cosmic fantasy film that draws from the deep well of Norse mythology while still leaving room for comedy would be the ideal target for future Thor movies.