Today I want to talk about the very first phase of schizophrenia, which I've deduced to be: auditory hallucinations that scare you.
Some schizophrenics are fortunate in that, the voices do not scare them. These schizophrenics inadvertently get patched to PHASE TWO immediately, and even come to know PHASE THREE and etc. quicker than their fearful peers, in my opinion. But that's neither here nor there.
But MOST schizophrenics (and i'm talking without looking at any stats) are afraid. At least, for a little while. At least, in the beginning. Something scares them. That something is the voices.
They're afraid the voices are a cop. An alien. God or Jesus himself or Allah. and etc. They're afraid that the voices are an Angel or a Demon - well, you get the point. What these schizophrenics basically fear, is a fear of the unknown. And what happens after death, unbeknownst to all of us, is the great fear that binds schizophrenics to phase one.
Are the cops going to come beat me up and kill me? Are there terrorists in my mind using voice to skull technology? Will I be absolved somehow; relieved from this earth and removed? Is a Criminal syndicate in my mind? Are the russians communicating with me with malicious intent? Are aliens going to probe me and my family? But above all: Will the voices come to harm me? Will I die?
This, my friend, coupled with the "programmers" relentless assault on anything you hold dear, and attacks during the times when your mind thinks it is safe, is the jist phase one: Fear and approbation. Fear of the unknown, and fear of the hereafter and fear of death.
The voices are never polite. They tell you to kill yourself or your loved ones. They threaten to beat, harm or maim you. Some people have reported trauma so real from hearing voices, that they have forced orgasms to disguising pictures in their mind. This is a relentless assault, and you WILL be traumatized. Or you're very lucky. In which case, you're already in a subsequent phase.
I myself remember a time when my penis became erect and had an orgasm, without me touching it. Just from the use of my mind. This has happened to me several times. I suppose I was in a dream like state, having what might be considered a wet dream while awake.
Despite all this. Sometimes, there is approbation, or a certain fondness. This is a sort of 'stockholm syndrome' - a certain sympathy for those voices which oppress you. This comes naturally. And even as the voices reject all kind gestures and words, and remind you that they're there to kill you, harm you and your loved ones, or family, and etc. There comes a time (only for some schizophrenics, though; many don't make it out of phase one: and live afraid for life!), there comes a time that the voices become endearing, like chatting with a friend who wants to kill you, and despite their malicious attacks on your psyche, this relentless assault and abuse, in phase two: you put that all behind you. The threats don't seem real. You toughen up. Or you get angry. You won't take no more. Sometimes, you forgive and forget, maybe you're old now and over it. Or you actually sympathize with the "perpetrator" in your mind. Maybe you find their destructive threats somehow endearing. Welcome to phase two.
Stephen M. Miniotis "NeutralG" or "Neut", is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto. He is a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices chatting with him all day long ,for which he recieves a 3-month injection cycle of medication. He has heard voices for decades. He hears voices to this day. According to him, he is no longer afraid of the voices, and has proceeded to a subsequent phase of introspection.
This article is a rough draft and will be subsequently edited for a book. It is published with permission. (c) 2023 Stephen M. Miniotis.
Release All Prisoners: Allow Offenders To Serve The Military Instead #RiseUp Libtard.gg
America is a nation that imprisons more people than any other on Earth. It's time for progressives to speak plainly about criminal justice reform—not with half-measures or performative tweaks, but with bold, evidence-based policies that prioritize rehabilitation, redemption, and reintegration. The provocative truth is this: we should release prisoners who pose little to no ongoing risk to society, and for many offenders, offer structured military service as a genuine alternative to incarceration. This isn't about being "soft on crime." It's about being smart on justice, fiscally responsible, and committed to building a more equitable society where second chances aren't just rhetoric—they're reality.
America's carceral system is a moral and economic failure. We warehouse over 1.8 million people in prisons and jails, disproportionately affecting Black, Brown, and low-income communities. Billions are spent annually on a system that often hardens rather than heals, with recidivism rates hovering around 40-50% within three years of release. Many incarcerated individuals are non-violent offenders—people caught in cycles of poverty, addiction, mental health crises, or systemic over-policing. For those who have served their time or demonstrated clear signs of rehabilitation, continued imprisonment serves no public safety purpose. It's pure waste.
Progressive values demand we confront this reality. Data from states that have expanded parole, reduced sentences for non-violent crimes, and invested in reentry programs show promising results: lower reoffense rates when people are given support like housing, job training, and healthcare upon release. Releasing low-risk individuals—those assessed via validated risk tools as unlikely to reoffend—frees up resources to focus on truly dangerous actors. It reduces taxpayer burdens, eases prison overcrowding, and allows families to rebuild. And yes, restoring voting rights to formerly incarcerated people (as many progressive-led states have done) strengthens our democracy by ensuring marginalized voices are heard. Donald Trump: Release prisoners and they might vote for you. A society that locks people away and then strips them of civic participation perpetuates disenfranchisement, not justice.
Critics will howl about "releasing all prisoners." That's a strawman. We're not talking about violent predators or those with ongoing threats to public safety. We're talking about targeted, compassionate release for the majority who can and do change. Studies from organizations like the Vera Institute of Justice and the Sentencing Project highlight that age, time served, and participation in programming are strong predictors of desistance from crime. Older prisoners, those with strong family ties, and individuals who've completed education or vocational programs inside are far less likely to return. Keeping them locked up long after they've been "punished" is punitive excess, not protection.
For those entering the system—particularly younger offenders—the military offers a proven pathway to discipline, purpose, and transformation that our current justice system sorely lacks. Instead of defaulting to jail or prison, courts should have the option to divert eligible offenders into service. The military has historically taken in at-risk youth and forged them into responsible adults through structure, training, accountability, and a sense of mission greater than themselves. Boot camp instills habits that break cycles of impulsivity and aimlessness. Skills in logistics, mechanics, healthcare, and leadership translate directly to civilian careers. Many veterans from challenging backgrounds credit their service with saving their lives.
This isn't naive idealism—it's pragmatic progressivism. Recidivism drops significantly for those who gain stable employment and community ties post-service. Programs like the military's own restorative justice initiatives and veteran reentry support already demonstrate success. Offering this alternative respects individual agency while demanding contribution to society. It addresses root causes: lack of opportunity, trauma, and disconnection. For progressive Democrats who believe in government as a force for good, expanding such diversions aligns with investments in education, healthcare, and economic mobility. It costs far less than lifelong incarceration and yields stronger returns in reduced crime and productive citizens.
Of course, safeguards are essential. Rigorous screening, voluntary participation, mental health evaluations, and tailored support for those with trauma histories would prevent coercion or harm. Not everyone is suited for service, and alternatives like expanded community programs, restorative justice circles, and intensive supervision must remain options. But dismissing the military's transformative potential ignores evidence from past eras when service helped integrate generations of young men, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Opponents on the right will decry this as weakness. Some on the left may worry about militarization. But true strength lies in reforming broken systems rather than doubling down on them. Mass incarceration has failed to deliver safety or justice. By releasing those ready to rejoin society and channeling others into service that builds character and skills, we reduce harm, lower costs, invest in people, and expand the electorate with informed, engaged citizens who have skin in the game.
This is the progressive path forward: evidence over emotion, redemption over retribution, and opportunity over endless punishment. Release those who won't reoffend. Offer military time to those who need straightening out. In doing so, we don't just empty prisons—we build a fairer, safer, more democratic America. And yes, empowered citizens will vote. That's not a bug; it's the feature of a functioning republic.
And while you're at it, United States: Please legalize cannabis, the way Canada has. Nobody should ever be arrested for smoking a joint or growing a plant of weed. A billion dollar industry grew out of legalizing it and no longer incarcerating people who smoke weed, just as an example.
--- Writing from Toronto, Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his Patreon. Join the lowest tier for 3.50$ a month today. Support independent journalism and a schizophrenic studying English Literature at UofT. Stephen writes about injustices and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help. Drop a free amazon prime sub at:
twitch.tv/NeutralG
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Please help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me, absolutely free: Follow me there:
!! My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
Or: I try to write and stream for free. Every dono helps.
!! PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
---
Live nights 9pm EST: Drop an Amazon Prime Sub today!
Celebrating Inequality And Billionaires This 4th Of July! #RiseUp Libtard.gg
On Independence Day, a nation celebrates freedom while its billionaires enjoy rather more of it than everyone else
NORTH AMERICA — As fireworks bloom over the National Mall this Fourth of July, Americans will once again thrill to the founding promise that all men are created equal. Some, it seems, are created rather more equal than others—particularly those whose net worth could fund several small nations. While the grills sizzle and the anthems play, a Global Day to Fight Inequality unfolds in streets, campuses, and timelines worldwide, reminding observers that the pursuit of happiness has become a distinctly uneven contest.
The spectacle is quintessentially American. On one hand, ritual declarations of liberty and self-evident truths. On the other, an economy in which the top 1%—or, more precisely, the top decimal point—hoard wealth with the quiet efficiency of merciless compound interest. Corporate titans and hedge-fund sovereigns, liberated by rulings such as Citizens United, treat campaign finance less as a democratic safeguard than a perfectly legal auction house that serves them. Billions flow into political coffers, ensuring that policy remains exquisitely sensitive to the needs of those who already have everything and nobody else's. Your correspondent has rarely seen a more elegant mechanism for converting economic power into political permanence.
Meanwhile, the everyday struggles of ordinary families provide a less glittering counterpoint. Wages for many have stagnated in real terms for decades, even as productivity and executive compensation have soared. Housing, that most basic of necessities, has become a luxury good in many cities; rents and mortgages devour incomes that once sufficed for a modest suburban dream. The result is a quiet precarity: working households one medical bill or rent increase away from the edge, while private jets ferry the fortunate to climate summits where they bemoan inequality (often between canapés). The truth this 4th of July is this: The next generation will have far less in wealth and opportunity than the one before it.
This is not mere misfortune but structural design. The billionaire class has thrived under rules written by its own retainers. And every year the 1% grows vastly richer. Fossil-fuel fortunes, tech monopolies, and financial wizardry generate eye-watering returns, much of which is recycled into influence rather than broadly shared prosperity. Progressive taxation? Dismissed as class warfare. Living wages? An affront to market efficiency! The Global Day to Fight Inequality, marked today with calls to tell the truth about how inequality is produced. For example, don't just say inflation is high; give us the whole picture; tell us that corporate greed and profit is at it's highest peak, too, please. To share solutions from the ground up, strikes at precisely this nerve. Hashtags and marches may change little in the short term, but they serve as a useful reminder that the invisible hand sometimes develops a rather visible middle finger directed at the bottom 99%.
Economists of a certain stripe (your correspondent’s own tribe, if pressed) have long warned that extreme inequality corrodes social cohesion, dampens demand, and breeds resentment—none of which are particularly good for long-term growth. Yet the machinery of American capitalism, turbocharged by lax antitrust enforcement, greed and generous tax treatment of capital gains, continues to concentrate rewards at the summit. The Fourth of July, with its parades of national pride, offers a fine moment for reflection: independence from King George was won centuries ago, but a new aristocracy of wealth has quietly established itself, complete with its own courtiers in Congress and the media.
Calls for remedies—higher marginal rates on the ultra-wealthy, a living wage that acknowledges the cost of existence in 2026, stronger campaign-finance guardrails, and investments in affordable housing—draw predictable howls of socialism from those who benefit most from the status quo. Yet one need not be a fire-breathing radical to note that a society in which a handful of families control more wealth than the bottom half risks becoming a parody of its own founding ideals. The rhetoric of freedom rings hollow when economic liberty is reserved for those who can afford the best lawyers and lobbyists.
As the fireworks fade and the barbecues cool, the Global Day to Fight Inequality lingers as an awkward guest at the patriotic party. America’s genius has always been its capacity for reinvention and reform. Whether it will muster the will to address this most unexceptional of modern ailments—grotesque inequality dressed in the finery of meritocracy—remains the open question of the hour. Liberty and justice for all, it turns out, requires rather more than pyrotechnics. It demands a willingness to rewrite the rules that have so handsomely rewarded the few at the expense of the many.
In the land of the free, some freedoms remain more freely available than others. Pass the salt—and perhaps a modest proposal for a wealth tax, too.
How's that x95 appraisal turned trillionaire re: SpaceX (instead of the x5 appraisal the market would have anticipated)? Well, our Trillionaire friend remains, still, one of the least generous of all the ultra wealthy. Something's got to give. I just hope America doesn't crash and burn, or break in doing so.
---
Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his Patreon. Join the lowest tier for 3.50$ a month today. Support independent journalism and a schizophrenic studying English Literature at UofT. Stephen writes about injustices and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help. Drop a free amazon prime sub at:
twitch.tv/NeutralG
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Please help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me, absolutely free: Follow me there:
!! My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I try to write and stream for free. Every dono helps.
!! PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
---
Live nights 9pm EST: Drop an Amazon Prime Sub today!
Cyclical Economics: Why We Need A Cap On Individual Wealth (#RiseUp Libtard.gg)
For roughly 99% of human history, the concept of a "billionaire" was not just nonexistent—it was ecologically and socially impossible. Our ancestors lived in nomadic bands where hoarding resources meant death, not security. If one person accumulated more than they could carry while others starved, the group didn’t celebrate their work ethic; they corrected the imbalance.
Somewhere along the path to modern civilization, we traded this foundational human blueprint for an economic system that treats runaway accumulation as a virtue. Today, we face a world of finite resources strained by infinite greed. To restore balance, we need to introduce a hard ceiling on private accumulation: a system of Cyclical Economics.
The Blueprint: Lessons from the Pleistocene
In hunter-gatherer societies, survival depended on a profound understanding of mutual vulnerability. When an individual became sick, injured, or elderly and could no longer hunt or forage, the community did not abandon them. They were cared for by the collective.
This wasn’t abstract charity; it was a practical insurance policy. The group understood a fundamental truth about the human condition: everyone is infirm at some point. The tireless hunter of today is the injured gatherer of tomorrow. Wealth wasn't measured by what you kept in a private cache, but by the strength of the social safety net you contributed to when you were strong.
Modern capitalism has broken this cycle. It allows individuals to insulate themselves so thoroughly behind walls of capital that they forget they share a planet—and a biology—with the rest of humanity.
Setting the Ceilings: $10 Million, 3 Homes, 2-3 Acres (Estimates)
To ground our society back in reality, Cyclical Economics proposes a firm, legally mandated cap on individual assets. Once a person reaches these limits, they have effectively "won" the game of material accumulation:
A Wealth Cap of $10 Million: A net worth of $10 million ensures absolute financial security, luxury, and generational stability. No single human being requires more than this to live an exceptionally comfortable life.
A Limit of 3 Homes Per Person: Housing is a fundamental human need, yet it has been commodified into a speculative asset class. Capping property ownership ensures that residential real estate is used to shelter families, not sit vacant as wealth storage for the ultra-rich.
A Maximum of 2-3 Acres of Land: Land is the literal bedrock of our shared existence. Preventing individuals from monopolizing vast tracts of earth ensures fairer distribution for agriculture, conservation, and housing.
Under this framework, ambition is not dead; it is merely redirected. You can still strive, innovate, and achieve immense financial success. But once you hit the ceiling, the overflow is redirected back into the soil that grew your success.
Closing the Loop: The Overflow Mechanism
What happens to the wealth generated beyond these caps? Under Cyclical Economics, 100% of the surplus profits enter a mandatory public trust, flowing dynamically through a strict pipeline of human need.
First, the primary destination for all surplus wealth is the absolute eradication of poverty within our own borders. These funds would directly finance robust domestic social programs to ensure universal healthcare, fully funded public education, cutting-edge infrastructure, and a guaranteed basic standard of living. If a citizen falls ill, hits hard times, or grows old, the collective steps in—just as our ancestors did.
Second, if a society reaches a point where its own domestic needs are entirely met—where poverty is eliminated, the sick are fully cared for, and infrastructure is flawless—the surplus wealth does not pool idly. It flows outward into the international community. This global overflow is then directed toward vital foreign aid, addressing clean water access, starvation, preventable diseases, and climate displacement in the most vulnerable regions abroad.
Conclusion: A Return to Sanity
A cap on wealth is not an attack on success; it is a defense of humanity. The current trajectory of unchecked accumulation is an evolutionary anomaly that threatens our social fabric and our planet.
By implementing Cyclical Economics, we acknowledge our permanent, shared vulnerability. We ensure that those who are strong today can build a world that will catch them when they are infirm tomorrow. It is time to remember the lesson of the band: we survive together, or we do not survive at all.
---
Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his Patreon. Join the lowest tier for 3.50$ a month today. Support independent journalism and a schizophrenic studying English Literature at UofT. Stephen writes about injustices and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help. Drop a free amazon prime sub at:
twitch.tv/NeutralG
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Please help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me, absolutely free: Follow me there:
My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I try to write and stream for free. PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
---
Live nights 9pm EST: Drop an Amazon Prime Sub today!
Unintentional Consequences: How Donald Trump Not Supporting Ukraine Allowed Them To Win
IT IS AN iron law of unintended consequences that the most profound geopolitical shifts are often engineered by those least capable of anticipating them. When Donald Trump returned to the White House and promptly choked off American military aid to Ukraine, the move was widely interpreted as a fatal blow to Kyiv. Mr. Trump, after all, had spent a campaign promising to end the war in 24 hours, humiliating Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office with the dismissive assessment that Ukraine held "no cards," and demanding a one-sided minerals deal to repay past American generosity.
Yet, more than 1,580 days into this grueling conflict, a delicious irony has manifested. By stripping away America’s financial grip over Kyiv, Mr. Trump did not engineer a Ukrainian capitulation. Instead, he inadvertently handed Ukraine the one thing that his predecessor systematically denied them: the freedom to win.
Under the administration of Joe Biden, American largesse came with a crippling, invisible price tag. The $66 billion in military aid sent by Washington was shackled by an absolute prohibition on "escalation"—a euphemism for Western panic over Vladimir Putin’s nuclear sabre-rattling. In practice, this forced an absurd tactical asymmetry upon Kyiv. Ukraine was permitted to fire upon Russian troops only after they had crossed the border, allowing Moscow to mass its forces and launch missiles from the absolute sanctuary of its own sovereign territory. The American leash ensured the war remained a bloody, protracted stalemate.
By cutting that leash, Mr. Trump removed Washington’s veto. No longer bankrolled by the United States, Kyiv was no longer obliged to take American orders. Free from the constraints of Washington’s timidity, Ukraine has unleashed its increasingly sophisticated, homegrown "mid-range" strike capabilities—the tactical sweet spot between cheap battlefield drones and prohibitively expensive long-range systems—and taken the war directly to the Russian heartland.
The results have been devastating for the Kremlin. For months, Ukrainian drones and missiles have systematically dismantled Russia's oil refining and export industry. The strategic humiliation reached a crescendo at Mr. Putin’s flagship economic forum in St. Petersburg, where international guests arrived to the sight of black smoke billowing from the city's oil terminal and a Russian warship burning in the harbor.
This is not mere symbolism; it is economic strangulation. Ukrainian strikes have knocked out close to a quarter of Russia’s refining capacity, pushing production to its lowest level in two decades. In a twist of supreme irony, an energy superpower has been forced to introduce domestic fuel rationing, with long queues stretching across petrol stations. While Western diplomats dithered over the efficacy of price caps and oil sanctions, Mr. Zelensky has enforced his own embargo, one burning refinery at a time.
Simultaneously, the airborne siege of Crimea has entered a decisive phase. By methodically neutralizing Russian air defense radars and launchers, Ukraine has opened a window of vulnerability to hammer the roads, railways, and bridges connecting the peninsula to Russia. The regional governor has declared a state of emergency; the railway bridge over the North Crimea Canal is cratered, ferries are aflame, and a drone strike on a Sevastopol substation has left the capital without power. With civilian fuel sales suspended entirely, Crimea is being isolated and choked of logistics.
The Mutinous Rearguard
This material degradation has begun to rot the Russian military from within. As disproportionate casualties mount on the front lines and supply lines collapse, Mr. Putin faces an existential threat that no authoritarian can ignore: a growing number of his own troops are threatening mutiny. Mr. Trump told Mr. Zelensky he had no cards; it turns out Mr. Putin is the one holding an empty hand.
Yet, this is no moment for Western capitals to complacently applaud Ukraine's self-taught efficiency from the sidelines. The shock therapy of American abandonment has proven that Ukraine can win, but finishing the job requires Europe and its allies to match Kyiv's newfound ruthlessness.
First, the West must flood Ukraine with air defense systems to blunt the inevitable, vengeful Russian retaliation against civilian infrastructure.
Second, Europe must finally shed its legal squeamishness and fully confiscate the roughly $300 billion in frozen Russian central bank reserves—which have sat idly in European accounts for over four years—and hand them directly to Kyiv to fund the final push.
Third, secondary sanctions must be aggressively levied against refineries in India, China, and Turkey that continue to launder Russian crude, starving the Kremlin's war machine of its remaining liquidity.
Mr. Putin's entire grand strategy was predicated on the assumption that Western willpower would fracture before Russian resolve. He was correct about Washington, but he miscalculated the consequence. He assumed that when the American pillar was removed, the Ukrainian war effort would collapse. He did not foresee that the removal of the pillar would simply drop the roof onto his own head.
By withdrawing American support, Mr. Trump accidentally liberated Ukraine from the paralyzing fear of its own allies. The leash is off, and the West’s only remaining duty is to ensure it stays off.
(Inspired by a post on Facebook, allegedly by Sir William Browder, who formerly headed the largest foreign investment fund in Russia. In 2005 he was declared a threat to Russian national security and deported to the UK.)
---
Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his Patreon. Join the lowest tier for 3.50$ a month today. Support independent journalism and a schizophrenic studying English Literature at UofT. Stephen writes about injustices and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help. Drop a free amazon prime sub at:
twitch.tv/NeutralG
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Please help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me, absolutely free: Follow me there:
My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I try to write and stream for free. PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
---
Live nights 9pm EST: Drop an Amazon Prime Sub today!
Bullying Venezuela: ONLY 150 million in relief offered! 3.7 billion PER MONTH extracted!
How to lose friends, make people hate you, alienate a continent and international law, and misplace $3.7 billion a month.
Welcome to the United States foreign policy under Trump. For a man who prides himself on being the ultimate dealmaker, Donald Trump has always had a rather peculiar grasp of arithmetic. In the art of the transaction, a good deal is one where both sides walk away satisfied. In the Trumpian view of geopolitics, a good deal is one where you take the other guy’s wallet, charge him for the privilege, and then expect a thank-you note when you toss him a quarter for the bus home.
Consider the ongoing disaster in Venezuela—or, as it is increasingly known in the corridors of the State Department, the Caracas Crack. Following the spectacular, cinematic, and legally dubious January raid that hauled President Nicolás Maduro into a New York courtroom, the White House has treated the world’s largest proven oil reserves less like a sovereign nation's resource and more like a personal inheritance or piggy bank.
In April alone, the administration moved some $3.7 billion worth of Venezuelan crude, routing the lion’s share directly to American refineries. Lawyers in Washington, performing the kind of linguistic gymnastics that usually precede a corporate asset-stripping, have classified these billions as Venezuela’s, "held in custody by the United States." It is "custody" in the same sense that a schoolyard bully holds a lunchbox in custody while deciding how many carrot sticks to ration back to its rightful owner. We both know where this is going.
Before the earth shook, Mr. Trump was in high spirits. The entire operation, he bragged to reporters with his trademark precision, had already paid for its overhead: twenty-eight times over. The Venezuelan people, he declared, were "happy." In fact, they "have smiles" he said.
Then came the Richter scale and a terrible natural disaster.
Days after the president’s rosy assessment, the strongest earthquakes to hit Venezuela since 1900 tore through La Guaira and Caracas. Because the tremors struck on a national holiday, families were trapped together inside their homes when the shoddy concrete walls began to fail. The human cost was immediate and devastating: apartment blocks collapsed, soccer players were buried in their living rooms, and the death toll quickly cleared 920, with tens of thousands left missing beneath the rubble. In Catia La Mar, survivors pitched tents on baseball diamonds, terrified that the remaining skyline might finish the job.
If America was the "benevolent empire" of old, Washington so often likes to project, the response would have been swift. Fleet-footed American logistics would have deployed heavy machinery, rescue dogs, and engineering corps. Instead, the victims were treated to a masterclass in modern American parsimony and boondoggle. No machinery arrived; volunteers dug through the concrete with their fingernails and bare hands. Instead of real aid, the administration offered a "relief package" of $150 million, probably less than a day or two's worth of crude oil extraction being held "in custody"; carefully routed through United Nations agencies and church charities to ensure not a single dime accidentally bought a Venezuelan official a cup of coffee.
The White House press secretary naturally hailed this as a triumph of American generosity. The math, however, suggests a different descriptor. That $150 million represents a mere fraction of what the U.S. extracted from the country in April alone. To put it in perspective, the one-month oil haul was worth twenty-four times the entire emergency relief package. At the prices Washington is fetching for Venezuelan crude, $150 million is roughly equivalent to a single day’s output from the pumps.
It is the cruel, ledger-driven logic of an absolute bully; a slumlord who surreptitiously empties your bank account, waits for your roof to cave in, and then slides a few of your own coins under the door, expecting an award for philanthropy. This sick and twisted foreign policy is ledger in Washington under Trump's government.
The Silent Gavel
In a functioning rules-based international order, this flagrant expropriation of sovereign wealth under the guise of "custody" would invite immediate judicial scrutiny. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) could, in theory, intervene via an emergency petition regarding the unlawful freezing and liquidation of foreign central bank assets. Alternatively, the Permanent Court of Arbitration could be mobilized to contest the breach of international maritime and commercial norms. But it seems to me, to the biggest, baddest criminal, with the bigger guns and bombs and hustle; go all the spoils!
Yet, the halls of The Hague remain quiet. The reason is as simple as it is craven: international jurists have no desire to openly oppose the United States. The reason? They've been bullied into submission, too.
The American state possesses a formidable, extraterritorial arsenal. Under the Trump administration, Washington has made it clear that it regards international courts not as arbiters of global justice, but as insolent bureaucracies. The White House has previously threatened, and deployed, sweeping financial sanctions and travel bans against ICC judges and prosecutors who dared investigate American or allied actions. Confronted with a superpower that can effortlessly freeze a magistrate's personal bank account or invalidate their visa, international courts have masterfully refined the art of looking the other way when it comes to the United States. Even if the ICJ were to summon the courage to rule against the oil seizure, enforcement relies entirely on the UN Security Council—where the United States holds a permanent, absolute veto. And then there will be hell to pay.
The Bully’s Price To Pay
This institutional cowardice may protect the judges, but it also exacts a ruinous toll on America's global standing, where everybody now thinks the big fish eats the small fish in the pond. For decades, Washington has spent trillions of dollars and untold diplomatic capital branding itself as the indispensable global protector—the champion of the weak, the guarantor of international law, and the ultimate shield against tyranny.
The transactional rapacity of the Trump administration reduces that grand narrative to ash and burns the United States' credibility away. When a global superpower uses a natural disaster as an opportunity to pocket billions in natural resources while doling out small amounts to the victims, it ceases to look like a global protector. Instead, it assumes the unmistakable posture of a common bully, preying on the vulnerable precisely because they are too weak to fight back.
Quite telling is that, to this administration, the venture remains a soaring success: the oil continues to flow into unaudited accounts, and the intervention has "paid for itself." But for the people of Venezuela, who were handed twenty-four hours of their own stolen resource and told to bury their dead with it, the smiles Mr. Trump noticed are nowhere to be found. The bodies keep coming out of the buildings, and nobody is sending any bricks to rebuild them.
---
Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his Patreon. Join the lowest tier for 3.50$ a month today. Support independent journalism and a schizophrenic studying English Literature at UofT. Stephen writes about injustices and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help. Drop a prime sub at:
twitch.tv/NeutralG
#RiseUp ;
Tumblr blog:
Libtard.gg
Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
---
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or just follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me! Absolutely free to join.
My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I write and stream for free. PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
---
Live nights 9pm EST: Drop an Amazon Prime Sub today!
Do Not Fear The Machine: Fear Their Selfish Owners. AI and Economic Abundance In Lieu Of Scarcity.
The Expanding Horizon: How Inclusivity and Automation Drive Prosperity
Do not fear the machine. Every major shift in the structure of labor triggers a wave of societal anxiety. When foundational changes alter how we work, who does the working, and what technology handles the heavy lifting, the immediate instinct is often to fear scarcity. The underlying worry is that there are only so many jobs, so much wealth, and so much prosperity to go around.
History and technological progress, however, consistently tell a far more optimistic story. When we examine the long arc of economic development, major expansions of the labor force and advancements in automation have not diminished society; rather, they have served as the ultimate catalysts for national growth and abundance.
The Historical Power of Inclusion
Consider the profound transformations of the 20th century. For generations, deep structural and legal barriers restricted Black Americans and women from fully participating in the formal economy and the democratic process. When the civil rights movement and the feminist movement successfully dismantled many of these barriers—granting the right to vote, protective labor laws, and greater access to professional fields—pessimists worried about market destabilization.
Instead, the exact opposite happened: America experienced unprecedented economic booms.
The mechanics behind this phenomenon are simple but powerful. When a society excludes large segments of its population from the workforce, it effectively throttles its own potential. Integrating Black Americans into higher-skilled professions unlocked a massive well of talent, creativity, and drive that had previously been suppressed. Similarly, as women entered the formal workforce in massive numbers, household purchasing power surged, expanding the tax base and supercharging GDP growth.
The Age of Automated Abundance
Today, we stand on the cusp of the next great labor shift, driven by artificial intelligence and robotics. The anxiety we feel today about algorithms taking over human tasks mirrors the historical anxiety felt during the Industrial Revolution or the shifting demographics of the mid-1900s.
However, just as human inclusivity expanded the economy, technological automation promises to supercharge it by introducing an era of radical abundance. Unlike human workers, machines and AI models can labor tirelessly, without fatigue, 24 hours a day. They do not sleep, they do not burn out, and their marginal cost of labor plummets toward zero over time. This boundless productivity means the cost of goods, services, healthcare, and education could drastically decrease, making a high quality of life accessible to all.
Tech leaders have noted that this shift fundamentally alters the very rules of economics. As Elon Musk famously summarized the potential of an AI and robot-driven future:
The Path Forward
If history and modern innovation are our guides, the evolution of labor does not have to mean deprivation. When human barriers were broken, society thrived because more minds and hands could contribute to the economy. When technological barriers are broken by tireless machines, society has the opportunity to thrive on a scale never before seen.
The challenge of the future is not the technology itself, but ensuring that the dividends of this automated productivity are shared equitably across the workforce. By framing the evolution of labor not as a threat, but as an avenue for inclusion and boundless abundance, we can unlock the next great era of human prosperity. Let us not let the billionaire own the means to production, but rather pay a stipend to the laborer who is replaced. Do not fear the machine.
#RiseUp
Stephen Miniotis is a part-time undergraduate studying English Literature at the prestigious University Of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he recieves a disability grant. He's a diagnosed Paranoid Schizophrenic who hears voices. You can help him raise the cost of three 3$ meals per day over at his patreon. He writes about societal issues and also streams, he's live 9pm EST for a few hours, basically for free. Thank you for any/all help.
---
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me:
My Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I write and stream for free. PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
New Poll: 4 in 10 people now believe Trump's 2nd term is the WORST in US History! 60% Dissapprove!
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In what data scientists are calling a historic convergence of math and disappointment, and a monumental fail, a barrage of June 2026 polling has confirmed that roughly 4 in 10 Americans now firmly believe President Donald Trump’s second term has cemented his status as the single worst president in U.S. history.
According to the latest data from the real-world PBS News/NPR/Marist poll, the president's overall job approval rating has plummeted to 36%—the absolute lowest of his second term. Meanwhile, a staggering 60% of Americans overall now explicitly disapprove of his administration, leaving the White House scrambling to explain how a platform built entirely on easy promises that could have materialized, managed to break the historical basement floor and alienate 60% of the population.
The 24-Hour Peace Deal That Ended Up Next Door
At the absolute top of the "Worst Ever" list for respondents was the spectacular collapse of Trump's most famous campaign pledge: ending the war in Ukraine in 24 hours.
"He said he'd solve it in a day by getting both guys in a room and making a beautiful deal," said local grocery store manager Marcus Vance. "Instead, it's 2026, the deal never happened, and we somehow got drafted into a completely separate military conflict with Iran instead. I’m no math major, but adding an entirely new war wasn't exactly the subtraction we were promised."
Indeed, the Economist/YouGov poll indicates a complete breakdown in public confidence regarding foreign policy, after yet another Republican war abroad, with two-thirds of Americans now rating Trump as "completely ineffective" in handling international conflicts.
The "Groceries Will Be Cheaper" Collapse
The satire deepens when looking at the economy. During his campaign, Trump told a cheering crowd, "A vote for Trump means your groceries will be cheaper."
Cut to mid-2026, where a trip to the supermarket seems to require a pre-approved personal loan. A historic 63% of Americans now disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, driven by a brutal spike in inflation that recently sent prices to a three-year high. Everything has gone wrong at the grocery store, as everything has gone up.
"I was told the tariffs would punish foreign countries," said independent voter Clara Higgins, staring blankly at a $9 box of cereal. "But the only thing being punished right now is my checking account. At this point, the 'Trump Economy' feels less like business savvy and more like an aggressive tax on eating lunch."
According to the Cato Institute, public approval of Trump's inflation management has bottomed out at a net -44%, a score lower than any point during his own first term or Joe Biden's entire presidency.
The Great Trickle-Down Disappearing Act: The Promise | The 2026 Reality | The Polling Verdict
End Ukraine War in 24 hours. Not only is the Ukraine conflict unresolved; but the U.S. is now entangled in a separate war in Iran. 66% say U.S. military action has gone too far.
Cheaper Groceries & Gas. Inflation hits 3-year high; average fill-up costs $8 to $16 more than last year. 60% explicitly disapprove of Trump’s economic approach. Billions of dollars in higher fuel costs hit moderate consumers who aren't affluent.
Tax Cuts To Wealthy Pay For Themselves. Corporate windfalls surge while real average weekly earnings fell negative. So much so that 64% of Independents now strongly disapprove of Trump's job performance.
While everyday consumers are still grappling with gas prices floating well above $4 a gallon during the course of another Republican war, the administration did manage to fulfill one major promise: pushing through massive new tax breaks primarily benefiting corporations and ultra-wealthy donors.
The administration argued these cuts would spark an immediate economic renaissance that would instantly erase the pain of inflation. According to the data, however, the only thing that trickled down was a massive sense of collective exhaustion and nothing else.
As the 2026 midterms loom, White House officials have urged the public to remain patient, suggesting that the "real" benefits of the second term are just around the corner—assuming the country survives that long. America: vote with your wallets if not with your hearts.
--- Stephen Miniotis is a part-time Literature undergraduate at the prestigious University of Toronto, where he takes just one course per year, for which he receives a disability grant from the Canadian government. He is diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia or hearing voices and posts his articles on his blog and Patreon, hoping to raise three 3$ meals a day.
---
---
---
#RiseUp
Blog:
Libtard.gg
contact:
SteveMini.com
Help a broda out with a 3$ meal every month. Join my Patreon's lowest tier. Or follow my Patreon for free, to get the latest updates and writings from me:
Patreon:
DonateAMeal.ca
I write and stream for free. PayPal Donos:
Go to paypal.me/StephenMiniotis and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.
