#non partisan

[jomiddlemarch]

MomsRising

Where moms and people who love them go to change our world

[grossbabygoblin]

We wtf are you a red piller? As an enby queer person lol good luck ever finding friends. A fetus is not a human being you absolute total moron. Also do research on overpopulation. And rape. Wtf ew why did I ever follow u no way u are queer

[when-emma-falls-apart]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=koPmuEyP3a0

Fuck yes Gillette! Be the best men can be.

How sickening is it that the right wing commenters all seem to be assuming that Gillette's consumer base is filled with rapists? They're encouraging everybody to stand up for each other. There's no reason this shouldn't be celebrated.

[theentiredsm]

A non-partisan take on guns

Three things are true: 1) We have the constitutionally-guaranteed right to bear arms. We can exercise this right in a variety of ways--some good, some bad.

2) We are cautious, or should be cautious, with all our rights, especially the right to free speech and to bear arms. These rights are extraordinary privileges; they must be respected and treasured. I may have the right to walk onto my university’s quad or into the middle of a mall and begin screaming about whatever social issue has my goat that day, but I should know that’s not the wisest use of my right. Doing so would only turn people away fro my message. Likewise, I may have the right to open-carry a weapon in many states, but I should recognize that doing so doesn’t help my cause--it makes me look like a radical and a braggart. It makes me look like I care more about showing the right off than using it to protect myself. 

3) The rights of our Constitution are the greatest rights that a government ever afforded its citizenry. Recognizing this fact, we must be prudent in acknowledging when change is necessary. The right to bear arms must be maintained, but its scope must be considered in light of modern development. We cannot continue to allow children to die because we are stubborn over history.  Ladies and gentlemen, if we test new methods to control guns and find that the new methods prevent 2,000 deaths per year while not infringing upon the rights of law-abiding citizens, what have we lost? In tandem, if we find the new methods do infringe on law-abiding citizens, what prevents us from abolishing them? What is lost in an experiment?  History will not be unkind to people who attempted to make change, failed, and prudently returned to their original system. But history will be terribly unkind to people who cared more about the right than what it stands for. 

[kethwithlove]

The Silent Scars of Public Service

I sit here, scrolling through the news at 12mn, my chest tight with a mix of anger and sadness. It’s 2025, and I’m still wrestling with this suffocating silence. I work in the government. I’m one of those people who clock in every day, trying to do right by my country. But why is it that we, people like me, with hearts and minds and voices, are gagged when it comes to speaking about the current…

View On WordPress

[partiesover]

Chapter 6 - Candidates Knights Unwavering devotion to team colour is fine in some places. Not in others.

[partiesover]

Chapter 5. Soylent Purple.

[partiesover]

Chapter 4 is an art. The Art of Being Wrong.