Thanks for sharing @kathynyc17, and I wouldn't worry about A. It's unlikely you'll give her an idea she hasn't already thought of 🤦♀️. Rest assured, there's an end date, and hopefully, NYC will bring a rebirth as it were, but for now, we wait, *sigh* 😞
Whilst obligations are active, the goal seems to be to contain A. When Lukola launches, the jig is up, and it won't matter as much if at all. But they can't launch until obligations are over. You see the conundrum? Yes, they'd have to sue A for breach of contract, esp. if reputational damage toward L could be attributed to her, HOWEVER - and Legal Anon has explained this before - it opens their private business up to the public, which is exactly what the NDA aims to avoid.
For that reason, some NDAs have a provision that states the parties won't sue but rather mediate any disputes. That may be what they agreed to, which is why we've seen what seems to be several renegotiations (i.e., when we suspect A was leveraging bullying claims, etc.).
It doesn't matter how much money you have, it just buys you a better lawyer. Look at Amber Heard-Johnny Depp, Justin Baldoni-Blake Lively, even P. Diddy (blech). All of them are extremely wealthy and all of them have been publicly dragged. Ethan Slater & his wife had an NDA in their divorce, and he & Ariana still got dragged.
In Lukola's case I don't believe it's half as scandalous as any of those examples but the risk is still high when dealing w/ a loose canon. And if you return to what was at stake post world tour - S3 ratings and baby Newts - it will save you alot of confusion.
Today was rather chaotic - alot of doubts and jumping ship, but I haven't and won't waver. Knowledge is power as the saying goes, and you are free to think & feel whatever you wish, but please keep it off of my blog if you're against my 3 non-negotiables. And if you follow or support wild theories about Lukola rebranding or privacy/ Lukola toying w/ fans, we have nothing to discuss... 🤷🏻♀️
