It is my conviction that misogyny has been ingrained as the fundamental and default condition of societal structures, as evidenced by the equilibrium it maintains between the oppressed and the oppressors. moreover, I contend that patriarchy was not merely a system that emerged at a particular point in time, but rather a pervasive framework that existed long before the term itself was coined. the act of naming such phenomena, I believe, serves to reduce their inherent complexity, as language inherently simplifies the intricate and multifaceted nature of human existence.
women often engage in intense self-policing, scrutinizing each other's behaviors and thoughts. while men largely escape similar scrutiny, free to exist without the same societal expectations.
patriarchy, in many ways, seems poised to endure because of deeply ingrained desires rooted in biological and societal expectations. women, by and large, seek providers and protectors, a reflection of both evolutionary instincts and the traditional roles that have long been imposed on them.
similarly, men often seek companionship that fulfills their sexual desires and the ability to pass on their genes. this biological drive, coupled with societal norms, continues to shape male behavior and relationship dynamics. these roles—women as nurturers and dependents, men as providers and protectors—are so deeply woven into the fabric of society that even as individual autonomy and gender equality progress, the underlying structures of patriarchy remain largely intact. It feels as though these fundamental human drives ensure patriarchy's persistence as the default social order.
partriachy is not going anywhere ,it's here to stay
