https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/21/wuhan-scientists-planned-releaseskin-penetrating-nanoparticles/
Leaked documents reveal researchers applied for $14m to fund controversial project in 2018

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Austria
seen from Netherlands

seen from Argentina
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/21/wuhan-scientists-planned-releaseskin-penetrating-nanoparticles/
Leaked documents reveal researchers applied for $14m to fund controversial project in 2018
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency granted $253,279 to EcoHealth Alliance in July to conduct research to thwart the use of viruses as weapons of mass destruction. EcoHealth Alliance worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the lab that many U.S. officials believe was ground zero for the coronavirus outbreak. The group's founder, Peter Daszak, secretly organized a group of scientists early in the pandemic to publicly undermine the theory that the pandemic sprung from a leak at the Wuhan lab.
The U.S. intelligence community is divided on whether the virus came from the lab or naturally spilled over from animals to humans. One intelligence agency assessed with moderate confidence that an accident at the Wuhan lab resulted in the first coronavirus infection, according to a report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Four other intelligence agencies assessed with only low confidence that the first infection came through natural exposure. Though the lab-leak theory was widely dismissed in 2020, a growing number of scientists now say it is the most likely explanation for the outbreak.
WHO attacks AMERICA after Wuhan whitewash: Investigator says US Covid outbreak intelligence is ‘wrong on many aspects’ and President Biden wants ‘to look tough on China’
WHO attacks AMERICA after Wuhan whitewash: Investigator says US Covid outbreak intelligence is ‘wrong on many aspects’ and President Biden wants ‘to look tough on China’
Peter Daszak, one of the scientists on the WHO panel, urged people not to ‘rely too much on US intelligence’ It came after WHO experts rubbished theory touted by the US that Covid could have leaked from a Wuhan lab Dr Embarek, who led the probe, said theory is ‘extremely unlikely’ and should not be studied any further But he called for further studies into whether virus was imported into China,…
View On WordPress
According to the Journal, the constraints placed on the WHO team rendered the scientists unable to conduct a thorough investigation into the virus’ origins.
A team of more than a dozen scientists, including one American, visited Wuhan last month, where they met with Chinese authorities and scientists to figure out how the coronavirus first infected humans.
A report of the investigation is expected to be released next week, after Chinese authorities have had a chance to review it and make edits, according to the Journal.
Some members of the WHO team, including Peter Daszak, the lone American on the mission, have dismissed one prominent theory that the virus originated from an accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which studies coronaviruses.
Most of the scientists have said that they believe that the virus jumped from an animal species in Western China to humans, possibly at one of Wuhan’s outdoor food markets.
Daszak has come under criticism from some within the scientific community who say he has a conflict of interest because his organization, EcoHealth Alliance, has worked closely with the Wuhan Institute. Daszak also organized a group of scientists in February 2020 to release a letter that called the lab leak hypothesis a “conspiracy theory.”
Dr. Peter Daszak, a British-American zoologist on the WHO team investigating the origins of COVID-19 in China, helped rally scientists to sign a statement in Feb. 2020 that condemned “conspiracy theories” that the virus had originated in a Chinese lab. Daszak, who helped funnel U.S. government money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for years leading up to the pandemic, deliberately tried to conceal the extent of his involvement with the statement, according to a newly revealed email from investigative group U.S. Right To Know.
In the email, Daszak tells University of North Carolina (UNC) researcher Dr. Ralph Baric that they should not sign the statement condemning the lab-leak theory so that it seems more independent and credible. “You, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way,” Daszak wrote.
“We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice,” he added. Baric, a leading epidemiologist at UNC, agreed. “Otherwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact,” he wrote back.
The statement, signed by 27 “leading scientists,” says the signees “stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.” It also specifically lauds the efforts of Chinese scientists, stating, “we sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China who continue to save lives and protect global health.”
Daszak, who ultimately did sign the letter but did not fully reveal the extent to which he helped organize its publication, later admitted he did so to help protect Chinese scientists from criticism.
Origines du Covid-19 : Peter Daszak, le "chasseur de virus" qui en savait trop. Le zoologue américain, qui a érigé au rang de vérité absolue l'origine animale de la pandémie, est embourbé dans des soupçons de conflits d'intérêts depuis que ses liens avec le laboratoire de Wuhan ont été révélés. Par Yohan Blavignat publié le 14/10/2021
Le 14 janvier 2021, plus d'un an après l'apparition officielle du Sars-CoV-2, treize experts internationaux arrivent en Chine, dans la ville de Wuhan, considérée comme le foyer de la pandémie de Covid-19. Après avoir observé deux semaines de quarantaine à Pékin, ils ont pour mission de percer les mystères qui entourent l'origine du virus responsable de la mort de plus de 4,5 millions de personnes à travers le monde. Parmi eux se trouve un certain Peter Daszak, zoologue britannico-américain de 55 ans, reconnu comme un spécialiste des zoonoses. Méconnu du grand public, le natif de Manchester est devenu au fil des mois le symbole des zones d'ombre qui entourent l'enquête sur l'émergence du Covid-19. Car, si la piste d'une origine naturelle est toujours privilégiée par les chercheurs, celle qui mène à l'Institut de virologie de Wuhan (WIV) et à une fuite accidentelle n'est pas close. Plusieurs questions demeurent : comment un virus dont les plus proches cousins ont été découverts au sud-ouest de la Chine et au Laos a-t-il pu se retrouver à plus de 1500 km de là, à Wuhan ? Quel est son ancêtre direct, toujours non identifié ? L'Institut de virologie présent dans la mégalopole chinoise qui étudie précisément les coronavirus de chauves-souris a-t-il joué un rôle ? Le culte du secret de la Chine et les révélations qui se succèdent entretiennent le doute et le soupçon. Et Peter Daszak n'y est pas pour rien
Shi Zhengli ou Batwoman directrice de l’Institut de virologie de Wuhan. La virologue de 56 ans, qui a grandi dans un coin rural du Henan et parle couramment le français, ayant effectué son doctorat à l’Université de Montpellier, saute dans le premier train à destination de Wuhan, une cité de 11 millions d’habitants connue pour ses universités et son industrie automobile. Durant le long trajet, les questions se bousculent. Comment expliquer l’apparition de ce virus au centre de la Chine en plein hiver? Ses recherches ont démontré que les pathogènes ont plutôt tendance à naître dans les provinces tropicales du sud-ouest du pays. Est-il possible que le virus se soit échappé de mon laboratoire? s’interroge-t-elle.
Do ChatGPT and Gemini AI Systems Tell The Truth?
Check out the misleading information they give on Covid-19 and Wuhan :
https://thewaynefocus.blogspot.com/2024/06/chatgpt-and-gemini.html
Elon Musk has stated that AI Software Schemes are not maximally truth seeking technologies. ‘They are pandering to political correctness
@RealDrJaneRuby
These bastards have been scrubbing emails and other documentation in order to avoid FOIA exposure on their gluttony and racketeering of gain of function to the tune of BILLIONS! WHEN does the prosecution of these crimes begin? @PeterDaszak @EcoHealthNYC
#Fauci #Baric #AmericanBioTerrorism