They should have just made the dantonists do community service instead.

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Australia

seen from Australia

seen from China

seen from United States
They should have just made the dantonists do community service instead.
On April 5, 1794, due to the execution of the Dantonists:
Rest in peace:
Camille Desmoulins, journalist, deputy to the Convention (34 years old) Georges Jacques Danton, deputy to the Convention (34 years old) François Chabot, deputy to the Convention (37 years old) Philippe François Nazaire Fabre, known as "Fabre d’Églantine," deputy to the Convention (43 years old) Jean-François Delacroix (41 years old) Marie-Jean Hérault de Séchelles, deputy to the Convention (34 years old) Claude Basire, deputy to the Convention (29 years old) Joseph Delaunay, deputy to the Convention (41 years old) Pierre Philippeaux, deputy to the Convention (39 years old) Marc René Marie d’Amarzit de Sahuguet (41 years old) Junius Frey (40 years old) Andrés Maria de Guzman (40 years old) François-Joseph Westermann (42 years old)
Robespierre declares that he doesn’t believe Philippeaux deserves to be expelled from the Jacobins: 1, because he never was one; 2: because he never professed the principles of the Friends of Liberty and Equality.
Robespierre at the Jacobins January 7 1794
Philippeaux is the real chad here.
-from "The Danton Case" by Stanisława Przybyszewska
The decrees concerning the discussion of the release of Ronsin and Vincent
Here are links to the parliamentary archives (unfortunately the texts are in French, impossible to translate them, I really don't have time, believe me I'm sorry) concerning the discussion relating to the request for the release of citizens Ronsin and Vincent, during the session of 14 Pluviôse Year II (February 2, 1794) as well as the reasoned discussion of Vadier who announces the impossibility of the Committee of General Security to present a report on the accusations brought against Ronsin and Vincent for lack of documents, during the session of 23 Nivôse Year II (January 12, 1794)
Which confirms my ideas: we know that it was Philippeaux and Fabre d'Eglantine who proposed the mention of arrest (especially Fabre) but let's be honest they are not the only ones responsible for their arrests, the majority of the CSP and the Convention who voted for are also responsible. The point is that contrary to the ideas of films of the French revolution Danton mostly let his colleagues speak for him (Desmoulins, Fabre, Philipeaux led the boat in the "faction" I put it in parentheses because it is more complex). Although we are at a time when Danton feeling condemned begins to go on the offensive (he has this in common with Hébert who backtracks in the most critical moments and sometimes lets Momoro and Ronsin lead the boat of the ultra revolutionary "faction") There is also as an ally of Danton Legendre who asks to speak. Bourdon de l'Oise is the one who is the most on the offensive against Vincent and Ronsin. To be fair Danton speaks out he asks for the release of Vincent and Ronsin in the same way as Fabre although it seems unfair to me for his colleague and ally Philippeaux (some would call Danton's attitude cowardly even if I find the word a little too strong). Interestingly, if Danton is applauded for his speech, the announcement of the release of Ronsin and Vincent is also applauded. This shows that the ultra-revolutionary faction is popular in Paris but still enjoys at this time a good respectability in the Convention although deputies are opposed to their release. Another most important point: the divergence of agreement between the Committee of General Security which announces not having found any pieces or evidence of accusation against Ronsin and Vincent and therefore in favor of their release (Vadier and Voulland) and some of the members of the Committee of Public Safety surely against . But to be fair Voulland and Vadier are for their releases but Bourdon de l'Oise is against the release (I think he was a member of the Committee of General Security) so there is a significant split. Another important point Levasseur announces that Mazuel, a Hébertist friend of Hanriot who would later be executed with Ronsin, Momoro, Vincent, Hébert and many others, had been arrested a first time on the proposal of Fabre d'Eglantine and was released very quickly. The Hébertists were therefore often attacked, which was not to help a possible reconciliation with the Committee of Public Safety (the Hébertists also have their share of responsibility, let's be honest I have the impression that all the "factions" and many deputies share the responsibility for these internal struggles)
The links:
Decree, proposed by Voulland, for the release of citizens Ronsin and Vincent, during the session of 14 Pluviôse Year II (February 2, 1794):
Discussion relating to the request for the release of citizens Ronsin and Vincent, during the session of 14 Pluviôse Year II (February 2, 1794)
Discussion motivated by the report of Vadier which announces the impossibility of the committee of general security to present a report on the accusations brought against Ronsin and Vincenzo for lack of documents, during the session of 23 Nivôse year II (12 January 1794):
What is interesting is that Vadier complains rather that the Basire, Chabot and Delaunay affair is rather very slow.
Philippeaux’s prison letters to his wife
11 germinal (March 31)
I conjure you, my tender and virtuous friend, to sustain the blow that strikes us with as much calmness and security as I feel in my new home; I think I am as well here as a prisoner can be. The cause which procured me this act of vengeance must elevate and enlarge our souls. Be worthy of it and of me by rejecting all attacks of pain and overwhelm. It is fine to suffer for the Republic and for the happiness of the people. I salute you and press you to my heart. Philippeaux
I just learned that Danton, Camille and Lacroix have been arrested as well, I don’t know the cause of it.
I was watching a rendition of Büchner’s Dantons Tod, directed by Jürgen Flimm (in German), and I took a couple of screencaps because it amused me that:
a) Camille Desmoulins has a moustache.
b) The dude who looks a lot like Robespierre in the first three pictures is actually Danton. (The actor they used for Robespierre is way too old and does not look like Maximilien at all, really not even a little bit. They should have picked the one who plays Danton for Robespierre -- he is a good actor though, so he makes a nice George regardless.)
The third dude that you can see here is Philippeaux and the woman is Danton’s wife, who is called Julie in this play. There is a number of gay hints. Like Danton and Camille touching foreheads and hugging and cheek-kissing a number of times, plus Hérault de Séchelles trying to outright kiss Camille in the first ten minutes. Saint-Just is not as pretty as I wish he were but they curled his hair and did remember the earring.
À noter aussi, un peu en retard :
I.3.3
Au lieu de Prieur, c'était Philippeaux (orthographié "Phélippeaux") que Hugo a fait signer l'affiche à l'origine. Ce qui n'aurait pas été juste du tout, alors je suis doublement contente du changement.
Le feuillet 78 du manuscrit porte cette note : "La nouvelle arrive que Louis Bonaparte est mort."
I.3.4
Il y avait à l'origine quelques lignes de dialogue de plus, que Hugo a biffées :
(Lantenac :) " - Je retiendrai ce nom : Tellmarch le Caimand." (feuillet 82)
Le marquis se leva et jeta sur le lit d'ajoncs son manteau.
- Il fait chaud, dit-il, je laisse mon manteau qui n'est bon qu'à me dénoncer.
- Que Dieu soit avec vous !
- Il a été cette nuit avec moi, puisque vous étiez là. Adieu, Tellmarch.
- Adieu, monseigneur.
(feuillet 86)