2D animation test for Pixar's Hoppers by Lorenzo Fresta circa 2020

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Armenia

seen from South Africa
seen from Armenia
seen from Italy
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom
seen from India

seen from Philippines
2D animation test for Pixar's Hoppers by Lorenzo Fresta circa 2020
#same
WALL-E (2008)
"they're not canon!"
girl idc you wouldn't have survived in the rise of the brave tangled dragons era like come on
This is like Avatar!!!🦫
turns out, almost a decade later I’m still obsessed with them. loved the second movie so much!
We need to put sex back into children's entertainment
That got your attention. I welcome the pearl-clutching in the notes.
I'm serious, though. The movies we watched as kids had way more sex in them than you remember. Not explicitly, but they had no problem alluding to and implying sex. The Incredibles had a full-on sex montage and a suspected adultery subplot. The Road to El Dorado had a woman proposition a man for casual sex onscreen and fuck him just out of frame. Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas directly referenced prostitution. So did The Hunchback of Notre Dame on top of having a creepy sexual predator for a villain who unambiguously sings about his lust for the leading lady. We all knew Simba and Nala fucked at the end of that one song in The Lion King. Batman: The Animated Series had Harley Quinn dress in lingerie and beg the Joker for sex.
This was mainstream children's media by major studios. None of this was controversial or seen as "grooming." Sex was just a normal thing to tastefully imply because it's a normal part of life. Having two characters discretely fuck offscreen was no different from having a villain fall to his death so you can't see the gore. They obviously wouldn't show it in a children's movie, but everyone who knows what sex or violence is can infer what happened.
I think the fact that this even shocks us is very telling of how insanely prudish and reactionary we have become regarding anything remotely sexual coming anywhere near kids. It used to be perfectly acceptable to do this in children's media, but the current groomer panic has really set us back decades.
I can only think of a handful of recent exceptions to this. The She-Ra remake elegantly pulled off a running gag where a character fucks robots, and Kpop Demon Hunters did not shy away from depicting sexual desire through exaggerated cartoony visuals. Hopefully, the breakout success of the latter sets a precedent for future projects.
We need to get more normal about sex and that means, among other things, letting Disney characters fuck again.
Before anyone goes and twists her words, pay attention to what she said.
"Anyone".
Anyone =/= everyone
There's a subtle difference.
What Charlie means is that redemption can come from ANYONE. It's a matter of choice, hard work and self reflection.
But it doesn't mean that EVERYONE can do it, or is willing to put in the work.
It's basically the same kind of logic Auguste Gusteau followed with his statement "Everyone can cook", which was later fully understood by Anton Ego.