Discover Top Posts Tagged with #possible worlds

Now, my own suspicion is that the universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose…I suspect that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamed of, or can be dreamed of, in any philosophy.

J. B. S. Haldane, Possible Worlds and Other Essays; from ‘Possible Worlds’

#j. b. s. haldane #possible worlds and other essays #possible worlds #other writing #^

Marco Crivello, Possible Worlds; “Channel”, 2008. Oil and Dutch gold leaf on panel. Contemporary abstract landscape, UK artist.

#marco crivello #channel #2008 #possible worlds #oil and dutch gold leaf on panel #oil painting #painting #art #contemporary art #abstract landscape #abstract #landscape #uk artist

The Philosophy of De Dicto and De Re Modalities

The philosophy of de dicto and de re modalities deals with the distinctions between different ways of expressing necessity, possibility, and other modal concepts in relation to statements and the objects they refer to. These distinctions are crucial in the fields of metaphysics, logic, and the philosophy of language, particularly in the analysis of belief, knowledge, and reference.

Key Concepts:

De Dicto Modality:

About Statements or Propositions: "De dicto" is a Latin phrase meaning "about what is said." In this context, de dicto modality refers to the modality of entire statements or propositions. It is concerned with what is necessarily or possibly true according to how the statement is phrased.

Example: Consider the statement, "It is necessary that all bachelors are unmarried." Here, the necessity applies to the entire proposition "all bachelors are unmarried." The focus is on the truth of the statement itself, not on the individual bachelors.

De Re Modality:

About Things or Objects: "De re" is Latin for "about the thing." De re modality applies to specific objects or entities within a statement, focusing on the properties or relations of those objects themselves, rather than the proposition as a whole.

Example: Consider the statement, "There is a person who must be the tallest in the room." Here, the necessity is about a particular person (de re) who happens to be the tallest, regardless of how the statement is framed.

Philosophical Implications:

Belief and Knowledge: The distinction between de dicto and de re is significant in the analysis of belief and knowledge. For example, someone might believe "the president of the company must be a good leader" (de dicto) versus believing of a specific person "that person, who is the president, must be a good leader" (de re).

Reference and Identity: De re modality is closely related to issues of reference and identity, particularly in discussions about how language refers to objects in the world. It raises questions about how we can talk about the properties of things independently of the specific language we use to describe them.

Examples and Differences:

Example 1:

De Dicto: "It is possible that the next president of the company will be a woman."

De Re: "There is a particular woman who could possibly be the next president of the company."

Example 2:

De Dicto: "Necessarily, whoever is the president of the company is in charge."

De Re: "There is a particular person who is necessarily in charge because they are the president."

Metaphysical Considerations:

Essentialism: De re modality often relates to discussions of essentialism, where certain properties are considered essential to the identity of an object. For instance, "Socrates is necessarily a human" (de re) suggests that being human is an essential property of Socrates.

Possible Worlds: In modal logic, possible worlds semantics can help clarify the distinction. De dicto concerns can be thought of in terms of propositions true in all possible worlds, while de re concerns focus on objects existing across possible worlds.

Challenges and Debates:

Ambiguity: One of the challenges in distinguishing de dicto from de re is that natural language can be ambiguous. A single statement can often be interpreted in both ways, depending on context and emphasis.

Scope and Interpretation: The scope of modal operators (like "necessarily" or "possibly") can affect whether a statement is understood de dicto or de re, leading to complex interpretative questions in logic and semantics.

Applications in Logic and Language:

Quantified Modal Logic: In formal logic, de dicto and de re distinctions are important in quantified modal logic, where statements about necessity and possibility are analyzed with respect to specific objects and their properties.

Philosophy of Language: The distinction is also crucial in the philosophy of language, particularly in understanding how language refers to objects and conveys information about their modal properties.

The philosophy of de dicto and de re modalities provides important distinctions for understanding how we talk about necessity, possibility, and other modal concepts in relation to language and the world. De dicto modality focuses on entire propositions, while de re modality concerns specific objects and their properties. These distinctions are vital for analyzing belief, reference, identity, and the logical structure of language.

In fact, this book reserves its strongest criticism for the ancient but persistent doctrine of mimesis, a theory of fictionality that claims that fictions are imitations or representations of the actual world, of real life. Mimetic doctrine is behind a very popular mode of reading that converts fictional persons into live people, imaginary settings into actual places, invented stories into real-life happenings. Mimetic reading, practiced by naïve readers and reinforced by journalistic critics, is one of the most reductive operations of which the human mind is capable: the vast, open, and inviting fictional universe is shrunk to the model of one single world, actual human experience. Even if its sole merit were to offer an alternative to the doctrine of mimesis, possible-worlds semantics if fictionality deserves a hearing.

-Lubomir Doležel, "Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds" (1998)

#fiction #literary criticism #mimetic fiction #possible worlds