princessoffloral replied to your post:Questions
if one person says no, then if the man continues having sex with her then he is raping her (past that point)? but that doesn’t mean he’s retroactively raped her. consent is continuous, i’m not sure how yes means yes links to the retroactive thing
It links to the concept of "retroactive rape" (which I admit I just came up with before I made the post) becuase I realized that under Yes Means Yes/ Affirmative Consent logic (as reported by Katherine Timpf), the man would be unable to prove consent for anything that happened, in the first scenario, beyond the last point the woman said "Yes!" before she said "No!". And in the second scenario, if the woman changes her mind about whether she wanted any/all of it the morning after, then the man is retroactively unable to prove consent for everything that happened, because she said she wanted it, but clearly she didn't.
And of course, the logic goes, if he is unable to prove consent, he is a rapist.
Of course, this kind of logic bothers me a lot, which is why I asked.