If you're wondering why polling averages are suddenly showing Trump winning despite all the bad news he's gotten lately- it might have something to do with this:
Basically, Republicans are ratfucking the polling averages by churning out huge numbers of partisan polls, and the polling aggregators/analysts like 538 aren't doing due diligence to compensate for it.
Now, what is the purpose of this?
Well, in the immediate-term, it creates a narrative that Trump is winning, boosting morale of his supporters while demoralizing support for Democrats and Harris.
Beyond that, if polling averages show that Trump is winning ahead of election day-which we can pretty much guarantee they will, because see above-then they will use that as "proof" of fraud if Democrats subsequently win.
Basically, they are engineering a pretext for their next coup attempt in front of us.
The only numbers that decide anything are actual votes. So ignore the polls, and VOTE.
"Why Winning Is Bad for Democrats by Anonymous Democratic Consultant"
Letās imagine that Zohran Mamdani does win, with a coalition of multi-class young people, immigrants, unions, renters, faith leaders, and pansexual mustache men. What does that mean for the losers? The investment bankers, the landlords, and the Wall Street guys who ask women on the street if ātheyāre sisters or somethingā? Was winning worth their tears?
As someone who won one time, I can tell you winning is often not worth it. You know what happens after you win? Governing. You know how hard that is? Who wants that kind of responsibility? Making peopleās lives better by advancing policies? Responsibility is incredibly stressful.
Ā Should Mamdani win and begin to deliver on some of his campaign promises like free buses, city-run grocery stores, or a rent freeze, it will certainly be a slippery slope. Giving Democratic voters what they want is just like the book If You Give a Mouse a Cookie. Whenever the mouse gets something, it only wants more and more, until the point where it is well-fed, well-rested, and happy. Itās a primrose path that will ultimately accustom Democratic voters to creature comforts like health care or education. As Iāve always told my clients, instead of giving a mouse a cookie, we should give him the ability to qualify for one chocolate chip, provided he completes a three-year apprenticeship program in an underserved neighborhood, and as long as his income doesnāt exceed $50,000 a year...
...Letās talk about the kind of candidate Democrats should win with. Mamdani is a telegenic, intelligent guy with real convictions. If he wins, what will that mean for the average, boring Democratic legislators and candidates who pride themselves on receiving all their beliefs from polls and the crypto industry? In a way, Mamdani winning is an ableist erasure of candidates incapable of believing in anything at all. Our big-tent party must make space inside for those who are dead inside.
- Sadly on-point satire by Francesca Fiorentini for The American Prospect.
Good news! A lot of those ignorant assholes in the comment sections are bots! They have been paid for by someone with money to create confusion and to try to influence opinions by pretending to be real people with real opinions! Call them bots, or block, and move on.
Bad news! This means the powers that be have remembered that Tumblr exists, so this is probably going to get worse. Stay sharp, stay vigilant, but stay frosty.
Rumors that he is about to be indicted in New York in connection with the $130,000 hush-money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels have prompted former president Donald Trump to pepper his alternative social media site with requests for money and to double down on the idea that any attack on him is an attack on the United States.
The picture of America in his posts reflects the extreme version of the virtual reality the Republicans have created since the 1980s. The United States is āTHIRD WORLD & DYING,ā he wrote. āTHE AMERICAN DREAM IS DEAD.ā He went on to describe a country held captive by āCRIMINALS & LEFTIST THUGS,ā in which immigrants are āFLOODING THROUGH OUR OPEN BOARDERS [sic], MANY FROM PRISONS & MENTAL INSTITUTIONS,ā and where the president is āSURROUNDED BY EVIL & SINISTER PEOPLE.ā He told his supporters to āSAVE AMERICAā by protesting the arrest heābut no one elseāsays is coming on Tuesday.
Trumpās false and dystopian portrait of the nation takes to its logical conclusion the narrative Republicans have pushed since the 1980s. Since the days of Reagan, Republicans have argued that people who believe that the government should regulate business, provide a basic social safety net, protect civil rights, and promote infrastructure are destroying the country by trying to redistribute wealth from hardworking white Americans to undeserving minorities and women. Now Trump has taken that argument to its logical conclusion: the country has been destroyed by women, Black Americans, Indigenous people, and people of color, who have taken it over and are persecuting people like him.
This old Republican narrative created a false image of the nation and of its politics, an image pushed to a generation of Americans by right-wing media, a vision that MAGA Republicans have now absorbed as part of their identity. It reflects a manipulation of politics that Russian political theorists called āpolitical technology.ā
Russian āpolitical technologistsā developed a series of techniques to pervert democracy by creating a virtual political reality through modern media. They blackmailed opponents, abused state power to help favored candidates, sponsored ādoubleā candidates with names similar to those of opponents in order to split their voters and thus open the way for their own candidates, created false parties to create opposition, and, finally, created a false narrative around an election or other event that enabled them to control public debate.
Essentially, they perverted democracy, turning it from the concept of voters choosing their leaders into the concept of voters rubber-stamping the leaders they had been manipulated into backing.
This system made sense in former Soviet republics, where it enabled leaders to avoid the censorship that voters would recoil from by instead creating a firehose of news until people became overwhelmed by the task of trying to figure out what was real and simply tuned out.
But it also fit nicely into American politics, where there is a long history of manipulating voters far beyond the usual political spin. As far back as 1972, Nixonās operatives engaged in what they called āratf*cking,ā dirty tricks that amounted to political sabotage of their opponents. The different elements of that system became a fundamental part of Republican operations in the 1990s, especially the use of a false narrative spread through talk radio and right-wing television.
More recently, we have seen blackmail (former representative Madison Cawthorn [R-NC] blamed his own party for the release of compromising photos); the use of state power to help candidates (through investigations, for example); double candidates (a Florida Republican won a seat in the state legislature in 2020 after a sham candidate with the same name as the Democratic candidate siphoned voters); and the deliberate creation of a false political reality.
Indeed, David Klepper at AP News reported just yesterday that Russian social media accounts are up to their old tricks in the U.S., pushing the idea that federal authorities have been lying about the true impact of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment because they want to divert U.S. money from problems at home to Ukraine. āBiden offers food, water, medicine, shelter, payouts of pension and social services to Ukraine! Ohio first! Offer and deliver to Ohio!ā one of those accounts posted.
So the United States has had its own version of political technology that overlaps with the Russian version, and it has led to the grim picture Trump is portraying in his attempt to rile up his supporters to protect him.
But hereās what I wonder: What happens when people who have embraced a virtual world begin to figure out itās fake?
Russians are having to come to grips with their failing economy, world isolation, and rising death rates as President Vladimir Putin throws Russian soldiers into the maw of battle without training or equipment. Now they have to deal with the fact that the International Criminal Court has indicted their president for war crimes. Will they rally around their leader, slide away, or turn against him?
In the United States, MAGA Republicans have been faced with evidence released in the Dominion Voting Systems defamation case against the Fox News Corporation that shows Fox News Channel personalities lied to them. Now those who have cleaved to Trump have to face that he is asking them to risk their freedom to oppose his arrest for paying $130,000 to an adult film actress to keep quiet about their sexual encounter, hardly a noble cause. And the last time he asked people to defend him, more than 1,000 of themāso farāfaced arrest and conviction, while he went back to playing golf and asking people for money.
Tonight, Erica Orden of Politico reported that Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg emailed his employees to say āwe do not tolerate attempts to intimidate our office or threaten the rule of law in New York.ā He told them: āOur law enforcement partners will ensure that any specific or credible threats against the office will be fully investigated and that the proper safeguards are in place so all 1,600 of us have a secure work environment.ā He also noted, without mentioning specific cases, that his office has been coordinating with the New York Police Department and with the New York court system during certain ongoing investigations.
Some of Trumpās radical supporters have taken to social media to make a plan for surrounding Mar-a-Lago and protecting Trump with firearms, but others appear to be more eager for someone else to show up than to do so themselves.
Ali Alexander, who helped to organize āStop the Stealā rallies to try to overturn the 2020 presidential election, wrote to his supporters today: āPreviously, I had said if Trump was arrested or under the threat of a perp walk, 100,000 patriots should shut down all routes to Mar-a-Lagoā¦. Now Iām retired. Iāll pray for him though!ā
3.5 million Black Americans were profiled and categorised as āDeterrenceā by Trump campaign ā voters they wanted to stay home on election day
28 Sept. 2020
Channel 4 News has exclusively obtained a vast cache of data used by Donald Trumpās 2016 presidential campaign on almost 200 million American voters.
It reveals that 3.5 million Black Americans were categorised by Donald Trumpās campaign as āDeterrenceā ā voters they wanted to stay home on election day.
Tonight, civil rights campaigners said the evidence amounted to a new form of voter āsuppressionā and called on Facebook to disclose ads and targeting information that has never been made public.
The āDeterrenceā project can be revealed after Channel 4 News obtained the database used by Trumpās digital campaign team ā credited with helping deliver his shock victory to become president four years ago.
Vast in scale, it contains details on almost 200 million Americans, among more than 5,000 files, which together amass almost 5 terabytes of data ā making it one of the biggest leaks in history.
It reveals not only the huge amounts of data held on every individual voter, but how that data was used and manipulated by models and algorithms.
In 16 key battleground states, millions of Americans were separated by an algorithm into one of eight categories, also described as āaudiencesā, so they could then be targeted with tailored ads on Facebook and other platforms.
One of the categories was named āDeterrenceā, which was later described publicly by Trumpās chief data scientist as containing people that the campaign āhope donāt show up to voteā.
Analysis by Channel 4 News shows Black Americans ā historically a community targeted with voter suppression tactics ā were disproportionately marked āDeterrenceā by the 2016 campaign.
In total, 3.5 million Black Americans were marked āDeterrenceā.
In Georgia, despite Black people constituting 32% of the population, they made up 61% of the āDeterrenceā category. In North Carolina, Black people are 22% of the population but were 46% of āDeterrenceā. In Wisconsin, Black people constitute just 5.4% of the population but made up 17% of āDeterrenceā.
The disproportionate categorising of Black Americans for āDeterrenceā is seen across the US. Overall, people of colour labelled as Black, Hispanic, Asian and āOtherā groups made up 54% of the āDeterrenceā category. In contrast, other categories of voters the campaign wished to attract were overwhelmingly white.
The 2016 campaign preceded the first fall in Black turnout in 20 years and allowed Donald Trump to take shock victories in key states like Wisconsin and Michigan by wafer-thin margins, reaching the White House despite losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.
[...] The Trump campaign spent Ā£44 million on Facebook ads alone during 2016, posting almost six million different versions of highly targeted messages that were pumped directly into the feeds of target voters across America, helped by a Facebook employee embedded within the Trump campaign.
[...] Brad Parscale, the campaignās 2016 digital director told PBS Frontline: āI would say Iām nearly 100 percent sure we did not run any campaigns that targeted even African Americans.ā
But Channel 4 News has uncovered evidence that the campaign did target Black voters with negative ads designed to crush Hillary Clintonās turnout.
These included videos featuring Hillary Clinton referring to Black youths as āsuper predatorsā which aired on television 402 times in October 2016 and received millions of views on Facebook.
In one confidential document seen by Channel 4 News, Cambridge Analytica admitted the Trump campaign did target āAAā (African Americans) with what it called the āPredators videoā ā spending $55,000 USD in the state of Georgia alone.
Reacting to the Channel 4 News revelations, Jamal Watkins, vice president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) branded it a modern-day suppression campaign, using data and digital technology to keep Black voters at home.
He said: āThe thing thatās shocking slash troubling about this is that thereās this category of suppression. That āDeterrenceā part. So, we use data ā similar to voter file data ā but itās to motivate, persuade and encourage folks to participate. We donāt use the data to say who can we deter and keep at home. That just seems, fundamentally, itās a shift from the notion of democracy.
āItās not āmay the best candidate winā at that point itās āmay the best well-funded machine suppress voters and keep them at home thereby rigging the election so that someone can winā.ā
.
Investigations Team:
Job Rabkin, Guy Basnett, Ed Howker, Janet Eastham and Heidi Pett.
News Production Team:
Sola Renner, Michael French, Josh Ho, Matthew Cundall, Tim Bentham, Tony Fryer, Dani Isdale and Anna-Lisa Fuglesang.
Ratfucking is an American slang term for political sabotage or dirty tricks. It was first brought to public attention during the Watergate scandal investigation that during the 1972 presidential campaign the Nixon campaign committee maintained a "dirty tricks" unit focused on discrediting Nixon's strongest challengers.
myiq2xuās at Corrente. Ratfucking--A GOP Tradition
white Tumblr leftists 2014: white people should never pose as black people, that's not cool
white Tumblr leftists 2018: anyway I think this account with Russian-derived speech patterns that started with a white icon and generic SEO content then changed it to a black icon later and reposted a bunch of altered activism content without attribution is legit and it's so suspicious anyone is criticizing them. stay woke š
