Hi, I've been binging Digimon Savers on and off around the time when you started your blog, and reading your analysis after each episode I watch has given me a new found respect for the writing and how strong it can be.
A little something interesting in the second opening that I don't think you've brought up yet is when the part where we see the Royal Knights in shadows is the figure on the left. We see Omegamon, Dynasmon, Rhodoknightmon, Magnamon, and Dukemon in full and the other shadows can easily be seen as UlforceVeedramon, Craniummon, and Sleipmon, however the figure on the left is too large and bulky to be Duftmon in any capacity. The only one who fits the silhouette is Alphamon, the only Royal Knight who was made at the time who doesn't show up. This makes me wonder if a plot involving him was scrapped because of time constraints, or maybe he was originally supposed to fill out the role Duftmon did (at least the bit where Duftmon only helps when he feels like it which corresponds to Alphamon more in that one of his titles is that of the Aloof Hermit) and he was replaced solely to promote Duftmon more. But that's all speculation I guess. Maybe someday we can get our hands on some drafts but who knows.
Yeah, you're right, that's definitely Alphamon's silhouette there in the opening, and not Duftmon's. I never really thought too much about why he wasn't in Savers; I guess I passively assumed it might be because the previous piece of Digimon animated media heavily centred on Alphamon, so they didn't feel the need to give him any more spotlight here? But that doesn't explain why he's there in the opening, so your theory that there was a last-minute change from Alphamon to Duftmon would make sense. Duftmon's appearance being so last-minute would also explain why he's by far the least developed of the three Royal Knights debuting in Savers.
(I didn't bring this up in the commentary despite having noticed that about the opening, because I'm not interested enough in the Royal Knights to have considered it worthy of mention. It is interesting trivia for Royal Knights enthusiasts, though, I guess!)
Thanks for reading the commentary; I'm thrilled it's been letting you appreciate even more of how good the series' writing is!
















