#runihara

[thescienceofapologetics]

One question I've seen posed in favor of legal abortion is: What if carrying the child will kill the mother, or both the mother and child? If there is no abortion at all, we've essentially murdered one or both.

For starters, intentionally killing the child goes against the Hippocratic oath. It’s is purposefully inflicting fatal harm to a living person.

Secondly, there is an excess of doctors and even abortionists who state that abortions are never a medically necessary procedure in instances where the woman’s life is in danger. This article goes into further depth on the matter.

[akumeoy]

runihara replied to your post “if you don’t have balls then your pee is stored in someone else’s...”

That's not how this works...that's not how any of this works.

[ill-be-istj-if-no-one-else-is]

runihara mentioned you on a post “Which Keirsey Personality Type Are You? - Psych2Go”

@ki-ne-ti-c​ and @ill-be-istj-if-no-one-else-is​ I thought this had nothing to do with MBTI anyway and was just a generic personality test.

Keirsey based his...whatever his thing is on the MBTI types, so his behavioral groups are supposed to correlate - he’s the source of NTs=Rationals [note that he was an NT which is why they are called that, because he thought he was rational], SJs=Guardians, NFs=Idealists, and SPs=artisans. MBTI as a theory never made those categories.

[dasaene-archive]

I was wondering if you could link some reliable sources for learning the instinctual variants. I want to learn more about how they work. Please and thank you?

Well you have the go-to ennea blogs @istj-hedonist @mbtiguy @aviesaurum etc etc

The standard Enneagram Institute site is good for whenever you need a refresher on the basics of enneagram or instinctual variants

Enneagram Instinctual Subtypes by Katherine Fauvre is really basic but that’s the only book I can remember rn, you probably need to ask someone else for better book recommendations

This is a blog so I wouldn’t call it “reliable” but they have some good descriptions of ennea core + instinctual variants in the “Instinctual Subtypes” section: https://oceanmoonshine9.wordpress.com/intro-to-instinctual-subtypes/

I don’t have money for books and have trouble trusting sketchy blogs or forums so I have to rely on my Ni/Ti or getting into discussions to fill in the blanks for a lot of stuff I don’t understand. So like...the most reliable thing imo is asking specific questions to blogs you like or in general for anyone to comment on and form your understanding from that if you’re running out of sources with material relevant to what you’re curious about

[hogwartshousehabits]

I don't know if you all have seen this yet...but it seems pretty accurate to me. from my page just add "/post/163751948274/the-basics".

We definitely respect sortinghatchat’s sorting system, even if we don’t subscribe to it :)

-Amy (Hufflepuff)

[okay]

If I can remember, my wife and I have a great recipe for some spaghetti sauce. It's all natural, no preservatives, lower sodium, and tastes great. We usually eat it by itself, but if you have to have some noodles, you could try Spaghetti Squash.

problem is im kinda picky with foods but im trying really hard hahahah thank you!!

[idreamofdraco]

Currently on the 7th book and it seems something in every chapter is making me cry. Ron just rejoined Harry and I cried...I dread getting to his reunion with Hermione...I'm not even to the worst parts of the book yet either.................

You are in for PAIN, my friend. I broke down so hard during chapter 34, I had to close the book and put it away for several hours.

[jerdle-typology]

Asking this because I want to get to know myself better. You said that Te wants other people to do things more efficiently (paraphrased), I'm an ISTP (Definitely introvert) and I can feel the whole wanting others to do thing more efficiently (especially those that whine about having "too much to do). But I'm a Ti user. What do you think would explain this?

Te is mostly efficiency-focused, but Ti+Se can be, too. INTP isn’t very efficient.