As many labels as there are, I keep finding myself having to decide between using common labels that most people know of/understand and labels that are accurate but less well known
Like Isogender (a gender modality meaning that one is neither cis nor trans for one reason or another) is a label I am fully comfortable with, but I don't know if I want to explain it every time it comes up? But then also how is it going to be more known?
I might be overthinking but I'm also worried about pushback for not being trans or cis because I have seen a bit too many people insistent that you are one or the other (which I am not, therefore Isogender) [I'm not opening the can of worms how that's a new binary- oopppsss]
Same goes with microlabels. Yes, I can just use the broader labels & string them all together like "Genderfluid & Genderflux but never a boy/man in any way"
Oooorrrrr I can just use "Faeflux" that is the most accurate & then have to explain.
But if I explain now, maybe someone later won't have to