seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Croatia
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from Czechia
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from Taiwan
seen from Brazil
seen from Brunei
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
"…the ongoing legal battles have not only spotlighted the judiciary's penchant for grotesque overreach—and this is especially true of the lower courts—but they also raise alarms about the budding constitutional crisis based on the Separation of Powers…"
READ & LISTEN NOW: https://www.undergroundusa.com/p/its-the-left-who-are-creating-a-constitutional
@everyone
An open letter to the U.S. Congress
Pass the “No Kings Act!”
1,255 so far! Help us get to 2,000 signers!
I’m writing in support of the “No Kings Act,” introduced by Leader Schumer in August. This bill would reassert Congress’s constitutional authority and curb the judiciary’s unchecked power.
The "No Kings Act" addresses several key issues:
Congressional Authority Under Article III: The No Kings Act uses Congress’s constitutional authority under Article III to set "Exceptions" and "Regulations" to the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. This power has been historically recognized as an important tool to limit the Court's reach, particularly when it comes to cases that could undermine democratic governance.
Neutralizing the Trump v. United States Decision: Leader Schumer’s legislation aims to counteract the Supreme Court’s decision granting former President Trump—and all presidents—immunity from prosecution for official acts. By removing lower courts' jurisdiction over presidential immunity and removing the Supreme Court’s appellate authority in this context, the No Kings Act asserts Congress’s constitutional role in preserving the rule of law and ensuring accountability at the highest levels.
Legal Safeguards: The bill also limits the Supreme Court's ability to review the bill's constitutionality, thereby reinforcing Congress’s role in determining the boundaries of judicial authority. This is not only a constitutionally justified action but also a necessary measure to protect democratic norms from judicial overreach.
If we don’t set limits on the power of a sitting president, or on our out-of-control Supreme Court, our democracy will suffer—greatly. Please support the No Kings Act. Thanks.
▶ Created on September 24 by Jess Craven · 101 signers in the past 7 days
📱 Text SIGN PLBYTZ to 50409
🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409
Text SIGN PLBYTZ to 50409 to send this to your officials.
The Rule of Law in Israel Is Not Subject to Political Pressure The State of Israel is a sovereign democracy that operates according to the p
"Trump, Feeling Emboldened, Pushes Agenda Into Higher Gear” #ABlueView A WSJ story with the above headline (
https://tinyurl.com/bdf5r72a
) had 2 amazing admissions about the end of the #SeparationOfPowers "Inside the White House, top advisers joke that they are ruling Congress with an 'iron fist'." "Steve Bannon... likened Congress to the Duma, the Russian assembly that is largely ceremonial."
Liberty in the Balance: Montesquieu’s Warning Echoes Still
“When the legislative and executive powers are united… there can be no liberty.” — Montesquieu Montesquieu didn’t just theorize government—he diagnosed its dangers. His warning about the fusion of legislative and executive power wasn’t abstract. It was a blueprint for tyranny prevention.
In the context of the modern presidency, this quote hits hard. When a president begins to blur the lines between lawmaking and law enforcement—whether through sweeping executive orders, pressure on Congress, or rhetorical dominance—the balance Montesquieu championed begins to fracture.
This isn’t just a constitutional concern. It’s a liberty concern. Because when one figure can both write the rules and enforce them, the people lose their buffer. They lose their breathing room. They lose the very structure designed to protect them from arbitrary power.
Montesquieu’s model wasn’t just elegant—it was essential. And every time we see those powers inch closer together, we should hear his warning echo louder.
Trump's, SCOTUS' & Congress' Undoing of American Democracy #ABlueView The separation of powers into 3-branches, states & the press devised by the Founders to prevent king-like power has been almost completely undone. SCOTUS & Congress willing abdicated their authority & power to Trump; something the Founders couldnt imagine & was true for 249 years. There is 1 just remaining, uncorrupted power center: the States (at least the Blue ones):
Hurray for #BlueStateOpposition! #ABlueView🧵1/4 As too many choose to obey in advance, the Courts have been the most effective opposition to Trump (& they've done well: tinyurl.com/79bw83px). Now another formidable player is starting to explicitly oppose Trump: the Blue States.
More 3-branch eg's: -
No Checks. No Balances. Trump's View of the Three Branches of the U.S. Government #ABlueView🧵1/3
-
New: Trump's 3-Branches Of Government #ABlueView🧵1/3 It's such a great visual metaphor, cartoonists can't resist ...
-
Trump's 3-Branches Of Government #ABlueView🧵1/3 #TrumpIsNotAKing #SeparationOfPowers #SeparationOfChurchAndState
Separation of Powers within the United States Constitution
Recommended video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dM5xOraf6g Website: https://history-education.org/ https://https://www.quora.com/profile/K-Jacob-9
Speaker Johnson at UFC Fight with Trump
In this video, I highlight a big concern that isn’t being talked about enough: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson hanging out with Donald Trump and his family at a UFC event. While most eyes were on Trump, Mike Johnson was there too, posing for pictures with Trump’s family, RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and even Elon Musk.
