#shscurriculum

[jaypeanutordone]

New SHS Program: This could be fire or put us on fire

AS much as I like to say that this is great,,,,, its just a BIG question mark for me.

Like, whats with the extra steps? Why are there only 2 strands? WE CAN ACTUALLY PICK SUBJECTS NOW?? HOLD UP, let's buckle up and let me tell you what I think: It's a rollercoaster, to say the least, reading the articles and stuff about this new curriculum. If you're asking me, "Jay, is it a nay or a yay?" WELL, it's actually both! It is great to be able to pick your subjects, and it looks promising on paper. BUT if you think about it hard enough, there is nothing great about it because it changes NOTHING. We still don't know how many subjects we can choose or how many we NEED to pass. More immersion work? Okay, that's kind of buns, but it would indeed be useful in the long run. Nonetheless, what exactly is the point here? I am thinking about this as a student and not an observer, it DOES look good on paper, and in retrospect, it might look even better than what we have right now. But how much of this is really good for the students and teachers? Equally, we will be put on fire with how much work we have to do, but the idea of this new curriculum is good. (KEYWORD: IDEA) As I said, it actually changes nothing but adds more steps to make it seem "sophisticated" in a way. Maybe to simulate how it would be in college, after all, shs curriculum is here to prep us for college, but this seems to be doing more harm than good. What makes me go "huh" is the fact that they cut it down to 2 strands. Academic and TechPro. It's.... weird to be honest. It ruins the whole point of a "Strand" because strands are there to categorize specialized fields of study under a broader academic track, and removing it just destroys its whole purpose. Sure, it allows flexibility and being able to do what you want, but why make this change? WE can absolutely have ACTUAL electives and keep the strands we have, but why cut it down into two? It doesn't make sense! Hence, it doesn't change anything but gives us more steps to take.

Another concern is how the faculty and the facility will be able to keep up with this? Seeing the vast selection of subjects, there is bound to be some problems with facilitating, and a lot more overworked teachers. The current curriculum is already tiring for students and teachers alike, but how much more damage will this do to the school? It wouldn't be a problem if the school had enough funds and facilities for this, but it's just not a good look, especially when you have to cater to a lot of students. I guess it's not ALL bad, especially the core subjects going from 15 to 5 because you need room for electives so its like an eye for an eye. A comment on making Immersion longer: It would be great to have the money for it! because the designated facility may or may not be far from where you live, so those unfortunate students who have to commute are going to take the brunt of the work. My final verdict: It's not great, but it's not a bad idea... I'd even say I'd agree to it. It's just very ambitious, and It all boils down to the school's ability to make this work, and the government too. It's gonna put us and everyone on fire. The electives are fire, tho, but other than that, implementing this literally does nothing IF THEY DON'T MAKE IT WORK. 'Tis but a humble opinion from yours truly, Jay

Sources:

https://www.deped.gov.ph/strengthened-shs-program/

https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/04/09/deped-urges-stakeholders-to-join-public-consultation-for-strengthened-shs-curriculum/#:~:text=The%20new%20subjects%20are%20Effective,ly/SHS%2DCurriculum%2DGuide

https://edcom2.gov.ph/deped-ched-should-review-proposed-shs-electives-college-subjects-to-ensure-they-are-implementation-ready/#:~:text=The%20new%20SHS%20curriculum%2C%20which,15%20to%20a%20more%20focused

[tapehead135]

STRENGTHENED SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM: What about it?

So yeah... DepEd's Newly Revised SHS Curriculum... this feels like another excuse for DepEd just to implement something naman...

So basically this "new" curriculum focuses much on work immersion and cuts the program into just Tech-Voc and Academics na lang... Ba't dalawa lang?? Sure parang experimental ito kung sasabihin, and that claims that it is aimed to strengthen the curriculum.

However, a lot will be cut down from its predecessor—the current K-12 curriculum—for which the current strands (such as STEM, HUMMS, ABM) will just be Academics, while retaining Tech-Voc.

Well yeah, when K-12 was implemented almost a decade ago, people believed that its just going to halt students another 2 years from college, pero it is said effected yung K-12, as with the different strands, we, the students are able to choose our track of our choice, but now, iisa na lang, which is Academics na in general, wala nang strands for which held a purpose in the first place. Ba't ganon pa??

Kung ganon, parang generalized na lahat... no passion. no creativity. oversimplified.

At tsaka, yung core subjects, from 15, naging 5 subjects na lang, with the rest being electives na lang. Yung research maging elective na lang, which dapat retained as a core subject as its essential rin for college.

Yes sure, meron rin yung work immersion, which is the new curiculum's focus, and does prepare students for the environment of their work choice, pero it seems like they are over-prioritizing this too much rather than academics, which is still fundamental for preparation in college. And considering 5 subjects na lang, andami talaga na cut down, at yung time and effort masasayang na lang... talagang wala tayong mapapala kung puros lang immersion at kulang sa oras sa pag-aaral ng dapat aralin.

Pagod na pagod na kami... puros deadlines... kulang na sa oras... kulang pa sa classrooms, at kulang pa sa facilities... nakakabuwisit na... dapat ang focus natin muna is fixing yung current problem, yung focus na dapat mabigyan ng tamang provision sa ating kabataan, katulad ng flexibility (yung pagpipili ng electives kaysa removal), workload balance, at yung availability ng classrooms at facilities and not cause another with a chaotic planning for our future learners.

Pero... who knows...

If this curriculum does get implemented, I would just hope that it will be as effective or better than its former...

But it then again, its always us to decide our own future.

SOURCE:

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deped.gov.ph%2Fstrengthened-shs-program%2F&h=AT150ejWwlE71veJ3Vc9v3R35FoRaq4re5iE2x1ObBE1SZyGmjtpv4u00EiHNHpUUrya63PUjhPdzqqi66R0u2PHLWOBE-gj32tJ7uaCqWRbBDkpVQMQPKtmcuY5mjLyEZyuW0KF6KHol8U&s=1

https://www.reddit.com/r/studentsph/s/3pEGd0VDEt

https://news.tv5.com.ph/breaking/read/depeds-revised-k-12-curriculum-may-worsen-functional-illiteracy-warns-group

[jwnrse]

NEW SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM THAT GIVES PATH TO STUDENT'S FUTURE

📷 Liezelle Soriano | The Post

Education has always been one of our strongest foundations that prepares us for the world beyond the classroom. It was late 2024 and early 2025 announced that there is plan to revise Senior High School curriculum and it suggests a change. A Change is never easy, especially when it comes with consequences and effects. This change is not easy as it has a significant impact, particularly in students who will adapt to this new curriculum. When the Senior High School curriculum was still being planned, many people shared their mixed opinions, and we also became curious about what the change would bring. We might wonder and ask ourselves, Is it better? Will it be difficult? Will it actually help students prepare for their future? These are just some of the questions that crossed in our minds. Perhaps, these questions also crossed in my mind, I’m sure like any other students who hopes for a more effective and improved education system, and now that changes are officially here.

In the new curriculum, students now have only two main options, unlike the previous curriculum that offered several strands. These are divided into academic and technical professional tracks. For me, turning it into two choices will make things easier for students and help them avoid the confusion of choosing among too many strands. It is more flexible, allowing students to select the path that suits them. From having several core subjects, the curriculum now has only five. I think it is much better so the students are be able to concentrate on such areas, making the students not only focus on their core subjects but also to their chosen electives. Additionally, the reduction of core subjects focus deeply on mastery and balance core learning with electives aligned to their interests.

Electives in the new curriculum can be helpful for students who are sure with their future path and for those who are still thinking on what path should they take. In choosing their electives, it could be beneficial as they get to choose electives that align with their interest and future career. This can be also their advantage when they get to college if their electives are aligned with the program they will take as they already have a foundation knowledge that could help them understand better as well as the lessons will be easier for them to absorb when they are in college. On the other hand, this can also be helpful for those who are still undecided about their future career because it gives them more freedom and flexibility where they can choose electives from various clusters, allowing them to explore different areas and discover what they are truly interested in. As someone who experience being undecided, I am really glad that students can now choose different electives or basically customize their learning. The “doorway option” is a good choice for them as it allows them to take subjects across different tracks giving them the chance to test out different areas.  For instance, students who are in the field STEM can take subjects related to ABM. I have some schoolmates who wants to take program that isn’t matched with their strands and it’s kind of hard for them since they didn’t have subjects that aligned with it. For me, this is really a nice idea because some students, especially in the old curriculum might feel being stuck or confined to their track.

Furthermore, the new senior high school curriculum has the increased work immersion. From 80-100 hours, they make it up to 320 and 640 hours which I’m sure that is very helpful in students as it strengthens their preparation for their future profession. These additional hours in their work immersion allows students to experience what job is really like and learn how the workplace operates. It gives students ideas and knowledge how to work in that specific field as well enhances their skills as they have actual exposure in the workplace and they have enough time to practice it. Overall, the new Senior High School Curriculum can have a positive impact on students. This newly revised curriculum is much more student-centered approach than the old curriculum and can shape students to be —more skilled, prepared, and better individuals in the future.

[keyskc]

My take as a graduating SHS student on the new curriculum…

The Department of Education (DepEd) is officially implementing a revised SHS curriculum for the upcoming School Year 2025–2026. The primary objective of this change is to make the SHS curriculum less overwhelming and more practical for real-life scenarios. The revisions are a result of years of feedback from students, teachers, and parents who expressed concerns about the limitations of the existing system.

Here’s a quick and clear breakdown:

1. Fewer Core Subjects

From 15 core subjects down to 5 essential ones focused on communication, life skills, math, science, and Philippine society.

Less memorizing, more understanding.

2. Only Two Tracks Now

The four-track system is now simplified into just:

• Academic Track

• Technical-Professional (TechPro) Track

- Arts and Sports are still available under Academic.

3. More Flexible Electives

Students are allowed to choose electives across different clusters. You’re no longer locked into a single strand, meaning more freedom to explore interests.

4. Longer, More Real Work Immersion

Work immersion is being expanded from 80 hours to 320 - 640 hours, so students gain actual workplace experience instead of just minimal requirements.

5. Pilot Testing Before Nationwide Rollout

Selected schools have already piloted this new curriculum for the DepEd to see and make any revisions before releasing next school year.

DepEd’s 2025 revised Senior High School curriculum: What has changed and why?

To address long-standing issues in the implementation of the Senior High School (SHS) program since its nationwide rollout nearly a decade a

Honestly? I agree with it. The new curriculum feels cleaner, more focused, and way more aligned with real-life skills. It actually addresses a lot of the issues students have been pointing out for years.

But as a graduating student, it feels a bit unfair.

We had to push through the heavier, more complicated version, overloaded subjects, fixed strands, confusing requirements, while the next batch will get a smoother experience.

I’m genuinely happy for them, don’t get me wrong. But part of me wishes this change came sooner. I wish we could have experienced the improved curriculum ourselves.

It’s bittersweet. We endured the old system, and even if we won’t directly benefit from these changes, it’s comforting to know that SHS is improving for future students. Maybe our struggles even helped push these changes forward.

What do you think about the new curriculum? Would you have preferred it if you were in our batch, or do you think the old system had its own merits?

References:

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1251640

https://www.newswatchplus.ph/news/2025/5/19/pilot-schools-revised-shs-curriculum.html

https://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php/articles/1249666

https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/04/09/deped-urges-stakeholders-to-join-public-consultation-for-strengthened-shs-curriculum/

[johngab]

What’s Happening with the SHS Curriculum?

Right now, the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines is changing the Senior High School (Grades 11–12) curriculum. They want to make it less crowded and easier to learn so students can be more ready for college, work, or business when they graduate. This change is called the Strengthened Senior High School Program and is starting with pilot schools in the 2025–2026 school year.

What Is the New Curriculum About?

Under the new program, the many core subjects that used to be required are lessened to only five for the students to take. Electives are grouped into flexible clusters and students can choose subjects based on what they want to learn, not just based on their strand. Only two main tracks remain Academic and TechPro but students can take electives from different clusters.

The good thing about this new curriculum is that it lets students focus more on the most important subjects without being overloaded with too many classes. Students can choose electives that match their interests or future goals, like business, science, art, or tech. The changes may also give us more time for real-world experiences like work immersion, which can help us be ready for jobs after graduation.

As a graduating student I think the idea of making the curriculum simpler and more flexible sounds good. I wish my batch had the chance to experience it because it seems more balanced, flexible and less stressful. Giving students more choices and experience that can help them understand what they really want for their future. Overall, I believe this change will truly benefit future senior high school students.

[y-kaira14]

💭Thoughts on the New Senior High school Curriculum💭

By Yvonne Kyla💜

According to DepEd’s April 2025 press release, the new SHS curriculum (rolling out in phases starting SY 2025-2026) streamlines core subjects from 15 to 5: effective communication, life skills, general math, general science, and pag-aaral ng kasaysayan at lipunang pilipino, all taught year-long for better mastery. Tracks are reduced to two: academic track (which now includes STEM, ABM, & HUMSS) and tech pro track (which is solely TVL). Electives are clustered for more student choice, and work immersion hours nearly double to 640, per Philstar’s June 2025 report.

Honestly, this has me feeling both excited and conflicted, and I won’t even get to experience it since I’m graduating this year! The big win is definitely cutting core subjects from 15 to 5. I remember juggling all those and barely keeping up, so longer time with each feels like a game-changer. I also love that STEM, ABM, and HUMSS are all under one academic track now; it’s a nice way to bring everyone closer. But here’s what I’m curious and a little worried about: how will schools handle the specialized subjects? Like, do ABM students have to take Gen Bio too, or will each strand still get their own focused stuff? That’s the part I really hope they get right, because those specialized subjects are critical for college prep. Also… kinda sad the next batch won’t get to experience the silent beef between strands, you know, the little jokes and rivalries that made SHS feel more fun? Overall, it feels like a huge step forward; just hoping schools have the teachers and materials to pull it off and that some of that classic Strand personality doesn’t get lost in the mix.

[amydhala]

The Strenghtened SHS Curriculum

DepEd is revising the SHS (Grades 11 - 12) curriculum to make it less congested, more focused, more flexible, and provide subjects that are easier to align with college requirements. (DepEd, 2025)

As a graduating Grade 12 senior high school student, I believe this emerging revision in the SHS curriculum is definitely an improvement, stronger, more practical, and a step toward achieving the best outcomes DepEd aims for in Philippine education.

Although it is a shame that my batch and previous batches did not get to experience this strengthened version of the SHS curriculum, it also fills me with anticipation about how this update will impact students in the coming academic years.

So what is actually changing in Senior High curriculum?

Core subjects are reduced: the previous 15 core subjects will now be cut down to just 5.

All strands and tracks are merged into two main tracks: Academic and Technical Professional (TechPro).

Fixed strands are removed and replaced with elective clusters: students can now freely choose subjects according to their interests and career goals.

Additionally, Work Immersion will now require 200 hours of duty, which is significantly more than the previous 80 hours (equivalent to 10 days). Having fewer core subjects and elective clusters is already helpful, as it allows students to align their learning with their actual interests and career goals. With longer immersion hours, this curriculum becomes even more effective, leading students to better understand themselves and gain greater clarity and certainty about which college course to pursue due to the extended exposure.

Overall, the strenghtened SHS curriculum might be an excellent progress in the Philippine education. By reducing core subjects, introducing elective clusters, and extending work immersion hours, students will be equipped to explore their interests, develop practical skills, and prepare them for college and careers with greater confidence. Because they will be given more choice, focus, better alignment with their goals, and more real-world exposure. Encouraging self- discovery and improved decision making for higher education and career choices.

While my batch may not experience this updated model of educational program, I am optimisticly looking forward to the positive impact this curriculum will have on future students.

[a-random-shoe]

SHS curriculum 2: Electric Boogaloo (Opinion on the whole new curriculum schtick)

Good evenin ladies and gents, this maybe a weird first (second) post but just wanted to give my two cents regarding it. Now to address the elephant in the room and a bit of a rundown. The current SHS curriculum will be reworked as to better accomodate students as the previous implementation was... kinda eh, like it was alright but honestly it could've been much better if it was done properly. Now for the actual new curriculum, first of all, tracks have been reduced and kind of reworked, now students can choose their electives based on their interests rather than a fixed plan. Along with that they reduced the core subjects required from 15 to 5, making things a lot more bearable for students. The tracks also mentioned earlier belong to two clusters, one for Academic and the other for TechPro (Technological Professional), Basically making the students choose a general range of subjects then narrow down the ones they want and the ones they dont Now for the meat and butter of things, My thoughts on it. In a short answer I completely support this change, with the whole "being able to choose" along with the more generalized subjects and lesser workload, students can focus more on the subjects they prefer and are interested in rather than fighting for their life to get a passing grade in something that doesn't interest them in the slightest. This freedom given by the curriculum gives the students lots of breathing room as they are already pressured by college. So in summary, yeah I agree with this and hope it gets implemented (without some side bull*%#$ like students have to be in like two extracurriculars or something). Anyways thanks for coming to my tedtalk, like subscribe and hit my bell Icon. I'll probably be posting here soon (some doodles or just rants of ideas)