#sidekicks

[whump-galaxy]

Thinking of a very young character rushing for help. They run into a notorious group of villains, crying and begging for help. Instantly, the villains become a protective guard, ready to face whatever monster is after the kid.

Maybe it’s a hero, maybe it’s another villain group, maybe it’s some punk trying to scare a little kid just for fun. Whoever it is, they’ll be lucky to get out alive.

[magnetothemagnificent]

Can you explain the Jewish sidekicks post?

So. We all know (I hope) that Jews invented the superhero comic book medium. One of the most famous sidekick-hero duo, Batman and Robin, was created by Jews (Bill Finger and Bob Kane), as was Captain America and Bucky (Jack Kirby and Joe Simon). Sidekicks have become a staple of the superhero genre (although unfortunately in modern comics they've been in decline).

In Jewish storytelling and theology, the idea of the lone hero is a foreign one. All of the most notable Jewish heroes in Tanakh did not act alone- Avraham had Eliezer. Moshe had his brother Aharon to act as his interpretor, Yehoshua to act as his right-hand man and apprentice, Aharon and Chur to hold his hands up in the battle with Amalek, and when leading the Jewish people alone became too taxing for Moshe, he set up a system of delegates to ease his load on his father-in-law Yitro's advice. Eliyahu had Elisha. Devorah had Barak. While the relationship types between these people varied from siblings to master-and-apprentice to a married couple, the running theme is that all these great leaders had assistance.

In fact, for Noach, while he was considered a righteous man in his time, one of his main criticisms is that he acted alone, that he didn't make enough of an effort to reach out to others. In the very beginning of the Torah, G-d says "It is not good for Man (humans) to be alone, I will make him a counterpart" (Bereishit 2:18).

The idea of a lone hero getting all the credit and responsibility is present in various European mythologies, and subsequently Christian theology with Jesus as the singular Messiah and saviour. In contrast, while the idea of Mashiach is bit more fluid in Jewish theology, even Mashiach is thought to not act alone, with two counterparts to Mashiach, a Mashiach ben David and a Mashiach ben Yosef being recognized, as well as Eliyahu HaNavi to usher in Mashiach. This also intersects with Jewish ideals of masculinity contrasting with Western ideals. The ideal Jewish man is not characterized by brute strength and the lone wolf persona, but rather by a gentle, intellectual man with close bonds and loyalty to his family and community. (I highly recommend reading the essay by Jonathan Sexton in Chapter 5 of 'Jews in Popular Science Fiction' for more about superheroes and Jewish masculinity, especially with regards to Batman).

Sadly, there has been a noted decline in the popularity of and depiction of sidekicks in superhero media, which coincides with the increasing erasure of Judaism and Jewish influence in the field. Sidekicks are integral to the superhero medium, and it's a shame more people don't recognize their significance.

[autumnmobile12]

Something that I think would have been a fun twist in MHA:

I've talked about the concept of Endeavor's former sidekicks before. His current ones throughout the series are all much younger than he is, so I have a headcanon that he did have a previous team that was closer to him in age. This previous team is no longer with the Endeavor Agency for three major reasons. The former sidekicks:

Are dead or retired due to the dangerous and physically demanding career.

Or found out about the abuse and left.

And that second one has a lot of interesting implications. Did they try to intervene on behalf of Rei and the children? Did they quietly bow their heads and leave? If they reported the abuse, even anonymously, the Commission could have covered it up in favor the No. 2 Hero being an invaluable cog in their system. Whatever choice the hypothetical sidekicks made, their inability to save the Todoroki family from Endeavor would have eaten at them the rest of their lives.

So the twist:

I think it would have been interesting if sidekicks who left the Endeavor Agency fell in with the Paranormal Liberation Front. Especially if the Commission is corrupt enough to cover up abuse and enable their heroes, tearing down Hero Society would appeal to those who perceived themselves powerless to help the family.

The scenario I'm imagining, though, is the former sidekicks somehow recognize Dabi as Touya before the reveal. These are people who would have known him when he was a child, after all, and recognizing him as their former boss's dead son is an impressive feat when his own family didn't.

Kinda picturing this scene from Arcane S2 happening at Gunga Mountain Villa.

“That man will face justice.”

A sort of Anti-Endeavor Agency forming if you will.  Current sidekicks vs former sidekicks backing father and son respectively.

Whether or not Dabi would accept the gesture or wipe them all out in a fiery blaze for their former inaction as hypocrite Pros is a coin toss, though. Personally, I kinda lean toward the latter being his more likely response, but I can also see him going the other way since his overall plan did end in self-destruction.

There's a lot to consider that's too much to put in a single post right now, but I am playing with this idea fanfic-wise.

[circes-world12]

Leader who’s small but can take down someone three times bigger than them from a mile away if they get their hands on a gun

Leader whose whole team is basically a bunch of bodyguards, but who all know they can handle themselves

Leader who doesn’t even trust people on their team because they know any one would kill them if they were in a room alone together

Leader who doesn’t see that their team would actually protect them at all costs because they’re a pretty good boss despite technically being a villain

Leader who doesn’t have any friends or family that they’re close with because they know they would just be used against them

[3ch0locator]

i have been thinking about this recently, but within the context of comic book fiction i think it is important to note that real world morals literally cannot and should not apply to properly suspend disbelief.

it is a universe, like fantasy, that tells us what is moral & immoral within its contexts. sure, this should be questioned as we all read through our own lenses of experience and believe, but you still have to set aside real life morals to suspend disbelief for certain situations.

for example, in the sidekick debate, within the universe of comics, we have to believe in a universe where a child actively wanting to be a sidekick, and trained in that, etc., is a good thing. more than that, it is the BEST thing for that child (if we're taking the example of most of the robins, this is the case) because without that training it is very likely they would attempt to be a superhero regardless, but instead without adult supervision or a mentor figure to support them.

if we were to apply real-world morals to this, "my teenager really wants to fight crime" would not be a reason to actually allow said teenage to fight crime, regardless of the training, supervision, or anything they are given to make them more prepared. likewise with "my teenager really wants to fight crime and wont take no for an answer."

( in many other cases we are told that violence is an answer were in many cases were in the real world violence would not be the ideal answer, and that violence should be critiqued. but you are told, and to understand the story you must believe that situation had no other solution then violence. )

[artbyblastweave]

🔥 Sidekicks?

Sidekicks are interesting because they were genuinely a very common type of character for a while- almost every cape in the golden age had one- but they've kind of been a dead horse trope ever since Spider-Man demonstrated that you could straight up mainline a teenage hero without making them the ward or pageboy of a thirty-something masculine power fantasy. Almost every example of the type at DC or Marvel has been allowed to age out of the role, and every contemporary sidekick character I've seen in Indie stuff is a riff on Robin specifically- the sole surviving example where they've done the legwork to justify the continued existence of that costumed identity within the fiction. I've got mixed feelings on that, because the titanic presence of Batman and Robin in the cultural imagination means that that'll basically always be a relevant target to take a swipe at, but at the same time, we get it. It would fuck you up trying to live up to the expectations of the senior superhero in the partnership. Half of all officially published plots involving Robin is about how it's fucking him up (whoever he currently is) to try and live up to the expectations of the senior superhero in the partnership. Yes there's a weird age gap, yes it's child endangerment, we get it. This is covered ground.

The controversial element is that years on, I'm still kind of fascinated by what The Dark Knight Returns has to say on this topic; despite that comic's many flaws, I'm willing to extend a handicap to a lot of its deconstructive ideas simply because they hadn't been done totally to death yet at the time of the comic's publication. I inherited an older edition of the book from an uncle, and in that edition Miller discusses in the introduction that an impetus for the comic was his realization that Batman, the thirtysomething paternal figure, never gets old or weak the way real fathers do, never receives the scrutiny a fifty-something receives from their grown children regarding how they were raised. And this line of thinking is so so visible in the book proper- At the start, Bruce is emanating intense "divorced dad who knows perfectly well why his adult children aren't calling him" vibes. The fact that Dick is clearly alive but wants nothing to do with him, just hanging over the book as this unseen presence, is really interesting (until Strikes Again came along and fucked that right to death.) Jason's involvement in this lifestyle got him killed (years before they killed him for real!) and that was a bucket of cold water that snapped Batman out of the fantasy for about ten years- but ten years on Bruce has Jason on a pedestal in his inner monologue because the dead can't question the project or distance themselves from it the way that Dick has. There's something very deliberately uncomfortable, too, about the progression of Batman's relationship with Carrie Kelley; sure, she's living out every kid's fantasy of riding out on adventures with Batman- giving children in the readership the ability to project themselves that role is the entire reason Robin exists, metatextually- but we also see in real time how near death experiences are cutting through the fantasy to fuck her up, and how there's an uncomfortable co-dependency kind of thing that's quickly forming between her and Bruce. The comic doesn't pass a clear-cut judgement on this dynamic; personally I find it difficult to cleanly separate what's deliberate commentary from Miller's habitual Weirdness About Women- but I'm compelled by it regardless.

[spectralpixelsredone]

1. Pro-Heroes

Definition: Licensed heroes who operate under Hero Agencies, performing duties like crime-fighting, rescue, and public safety. They are regulated by the Hero Public Safety Commission (HPSC) and often ranked based on popularity and effectiveness (e.g., All Might, Endeavor).

Analysis:

Role in Society: Pro-Heroes are the backbone of MHA’s hero society, serving as both protectors and public figures. They maintain order in a world where Quirks create chaos, with top heroes like All Might acting as “Symbols of Peace.” Their visibility and rankings (e.g., Endeavor as No. 1 post-All Might) amplify their influence, but also pressure them to perform.

Strengths: Professional training, access to resources (agencies, sidekicks), and legal authority to use Quirks in public. Their structured system allows for specialization (e.g., Thirteen’s rescue focus, Endeavor’s combat prowess).

Weaknesses: Bureaucratic oversight by the HPSC can limit autonomy, as seen with Endeavor’s struggle to balance personal atonement with public duties. The ranking system fosters competition over collaboration, and public adoration can breed complacency or arrogance (e.g., Yoroi Musha’s retirement during crisis).

Narrative Significance: Pro-Heroes drive the series’ central conflict between heroism and villainy. Characters like All Might embody idealized heroism, while Endeavor’s arc highlights redemption and the flaws of ambition. Their dependence on public trust makes them vulnerable to societal shifts, as seen with Tomura Shigaraki exploiting public disillusionment.

Corruption Likelihood: Moderate. Most Pro-Heroes are driven by duty (e.g., Ryukyu, Best Jeanist), but ambition (Endeavor) or external pressure (HPSC manipulation) can lead to moral compromises. The system’s reliance on popularity incentivizes self-interest in some cases.

Speculation: As hero society stabilizes post-series, Pro-Heroes may face stricter regulations to prevent corruption, but their numbers could dwindle due to public distrust and fewer Quirks (if Eri’s Rewind Quirk is used to de-power society). New Pro-Heroes like Deku may redefine the role to focus on community-based heroism.

Key Examples: All Might (retired), Endeavor, Best Jeanist, Ryukyu, Edgeshot.

2. Regular Heroes

Definition: Licensed heroes who operate independently or in smaller agencies, often less prominent than top-ranked Pro-Heroes. They handle local or minor incidents and lack the fame of Pro-Heroes.

Analysis:

Role in Society: Regular Heroes fill gaps left by high-profile Pro-Heroes, patrolling neighborhoods or assisting in low-stakes rescues. They’re less likely to appear in media but are crucial for grassroots safety (e.g., Manual’s agency in Hosu).

Strengths: Flexibility to focus on local needs and less pressure from public scrutiny. Their lower profile allows genuine altruism, as seen with Manual’s humility despite suspecting Iida’s ulterior motives.

Weaknesses: Limited resources and influence compared to Pro-Heroes. They’re often overshadowed, reducing their impact during major crises. Their obscurity can lead to disillusionment, as implied by Manual’s frustration with public criticism.

Narrative Significance: Regular Heroes humanize the profession, showing the grind behind the glamour. They contrast with celebrity-driven Pro-Heroes, highlighting the diversity of motivations (e.g., Manual’s quiet dedication vs. Mt. Lady’s spotlight-chasing).

Corruption Likelihood: Low to moderate. Their lack of fame reduces temptation for self-interest, but financial struggles or HPSC pressure could push some toward unethical shortcuts.

Speculation: Regular Heroes may gain prominence in a post-war MHA world where public trust in top heroes wanes. They could form cooperative networks to rival larger agencies, emphasizing community over celebrity.

Key Examples: Manual, Gunhead, Kamui Woods, Lunch Rush.

3. Hero Commission Heroes

Definition: Heroes directly controlled or influenced by the HPSC, often trained from a young age or coerced into service. Subcategories include:

Corrupt/Forcibly Corrupt: Heroes manipulated into unethical acts (e.g., Hawks killing Twice, Lady Nagant’s assassinations).

Non-Corrupt: Heroes under HPSC but maintaining personal integrity (e.g., Best Jeanist’s principled approach).

Analysis:

Role in Society: These heroes serve as the HPSC’s enforcers, handling covert operations or high-stakes missions. They maintain the hero system’s stability, often at moral cost (e.g., Hawks infiltrating the League of Villains).

Strengths: Elite training, access to classified intel, and HPSC backing make them highly effective. Hawks’ versatility and Nagant’s precision exemplify their skill.

Weaknesses: Moral dilemmas and loss of autonomy erode their psyche. Hawks’ forced killing of Twice and Nagant’s defection highlight the toll of HPSC control. Public exposure of their actions risks backlash (e.g., Nagant’s imprisonment).

Narrative Significance: They expose the hero system’s dark underbelly, questioning the cost of order. Hawks’ duality (heroic yet ruthless) and Nagant’s rebellion critique institutional corruption, contrasting with All Might’s pure heroism.

Corruption Likelihood: High for corrupt/forcibly corrupt, as HPSC coercion often overrides personal ethics. Non-corrupt heroes resist but face constant pressure (e.g., Best Jeanist’s cautious navigation of HPSC dynamics).

Speculation: Post-HPSC reform, these heroes may transition to transparent roles or defect to independent agencies. A new oversight body could emerge to prevent coercion, but some may turn vigilante if distrust persists.

Key Examples: Hawks (forcibly corrupt), Lady Nagant (corrupt/defected), Best Jeanist (non-corrupt).

4. Celebrity Heroes

Definition: Heroes who prioritize fame, wealth, or personal pleasure over altruistic duty. They thrive on media attention and often retire during crises (e.g., Yoroi Musha).

Analysis:

Role in Society: Celebrity Heroes boost the hero industry’s visibility, drawing public support through charisma and spectacle (e.g., Mt. Lady’s debut stealing Kamui Woods’ spotlight). They’re marketable but less reliable in emergencies.

Strengths: Media savvy and public appeal make them effective at rallying support or funding. Mt. Lady’s ability to monetize her image sustains her agency despite collateral damage costs.

Weaknesses: Shallow motivations lead to unreliability. Yoroi Musha’s retirement and Mt. Lady’s initial focus on fame over duty show their fragility under pressure. Public backlash can quickly turn against them (e.g., Endeavor post-Dabi reveal).

Narrative Significance: They critique the commodification of heroism, showing how fame distorts duty. Mt. Lady’s growth into a more responsible hero contrasts with Yoroi Musha’s cowardice, highlighting redemption vs. failure.

Corruption Likelihood: High. Their focus on self-interest makes them prone to exploiting their status or abandoning duty for personal gain.

Speculation: Celebrity Heroes may face declining relevance as society demands authentic heroism post-war. Those like Mt. Lady, who evolve, could adapt, while others may fade into obscurity or pivot to entertainment.

Key Examples: Mt. Lady (evolving), Yoroi Musha (retired), Uwabami (self-serving).

5. Sidekicks

Definition: Heroes who work under Pro-Heroes in agencies, often in supporting roles. They range from aspiring heroes (e.g., Bubble Girl) to long-term subordinates (e.g., Kido, Onima).

Analysis:

Role in Society: Sidekicks handle logistics, backup, or specialized tasks, enabling Pro-Heroes to focus on high-priority missions. They’re essential for agency efficiency (e.g., Bubble Girl’s support for Nighteye).

Strengths: Teamwork-oriented, with opportunities to learn from experienced heroes. Their lower profile allows focus on skill development (e.g., Sirius’ synergy with Selkie).

Weaknesses: Limited autonomy and recognition can breed resentment or stagnation. Some, like Gang Orca’s sidekicks, remain unnamed, suggesting expendability.

Narrative Significance: Sidekicks represent the unsung labor of hero society, paralleling real-world support roles. Their loyalty (e.g., Kido’s dedication to Endeavor) contrasts with the ambition of Pro-Heroes, grounding the narrative.

Corruption Likelihood: Low to moderate. Most are loyal, but agency culture or HPSC influence could corrupt them indirectly (e.g., Endeavor’s sidekicks enabling his abusive past).

Speculation: Sidekicks may gain prominence as agencies rebuild, with some (e.g., Bubble Girl) becoming Pro-Heroes. A merit-based promotion system could emerge to reward their contributions.

Key Examples: Bubble Girl, Sirius, Kido, Onima, Midnight Boys (inactive).

6. Corrupt Heroes

Definition: Heroes who abuse their authority for personal gain, power, or malicious intent. Distinct from forcibly corrupt HPSC heroes, as their corruption is self-driven.

Analysis:

Role in Society: Corrupt Heroes undermine public trust, exploiting their status for profit or control. They’re rare but impactful, as their actions fuel villainy (e.g., Tomura Shigaraki’s resentment from hero neglect).

Strengths: Their hero status grants legal protection and public trust, making corruption harder to detect. They can manipulate systems for personal benefit (e.g., hypothetical profiteering from rescues).

Weaknesses: Exposure risks career destruction and villainous alliances (e.g., Nagant’s defection after HPSC corruption). Their actions often backfire, as seen with Endeavor’s tarnished legacy.

Narrative Significance: They highlight the fragility of hero society, showing how self-interest erodes trust. Endeavor’s abusive past, while not fully corrupt, parallels this by damaging his family and reputation.

Corruption Likelihood: Inherent, as this category defines self-driven corruption. Motivations include greed, power, or revenge.

Speculation: Corrupt Heroes may increase if hero society destabilizes, exploiting chaos for gain. Post-war reforms could expose more, leading to purges or defections to villainy.

Key Examples: None explicitly named in the document, but Endeavor’s early abusiveness and Yoroi Musha’s cowardice skirt this category. Hypothetical examples include heroes profiteering from crises.

7. Vigilante Heroes

Definition: Unlicensed individuals who fight crime using their Quirks, often outside legal boundaries. They predate the Pro-Hero system and operate in gray areas (e.g., historical Vigilantes).

Analysis:

Role in Society: Vigilantes address gaps in hero coverage, tackling crimes Pro-Heroes overlook. They’re polarizing, seen as heroes by some and criminals by others (e.g., Koichi in Vigilantes).

Strengths: Freedom from bureaucracy allows swift action and moral flexibility. Their grassroots approach resonates with marginalized communities distrustful of heroes.

Weaknesses: Illegal status risks arrest or villain alliances. Lack of training and resources makes them vulnerable (e.g., early Vigilantes’ reliance on improvisation).

Narrative Significance: Vigilantes challenge the hero system’s legitimacy, questioning whether legality equals morality. They foreshadow a potential return to decentralized heroism if Pro-Heroes fail.

Corruption Likelihood: Moderate. Idealism drives most, but desperation or resentment (e.g., Stain’s ideology) can twist them into quasi-villains.

Speculation: Vigilantes may resurge post-war as public faith in heroes wanes. Deku’s vigilante phase in the manga suggests a hybrid model where licensed heroes adopt vigilante tactics.

Key Examples: Historical Vigilantes (pre-Pro-Hero era), Koichi (from Vigilantes), Stain (quasi-vigilante).

8. Drifter Heroes

Definition: Independent heroes who operate without fixed agencies, moving freely and often prioritizing personal goals or instincts (e.g., Mirko’s lone-wolf style).

Analysis:

Role in Society: Drifter Heroes tackle high-risk missions or personal vendettas, often in areas Pro-Heroes avoid. Mirko’s aggressive, unbound approach exemplifies their disregard for convention.

Strengths: Unconstrained by bureaucracy, they act decisively and adapt quickly. Mirko’s resilience despite severe injuries showcases their self-reliance.

Weaknesses: Isolation limits teamwork and support, increasing risk (e.g., Mirko’s near-death encounters). Their unpredictability can alienate allies or the public.

Narrative Significance: Drifters embody raw heroism, contrasting with structured Pro-Heroes. Mirko’s defiance of norms highlights individual agency in a conformist system.

Corruption Likelihood: Low to moderate. Their independence reduces external pressure, but personal grudges or survival needs could lead to moral lapses.

Speculation: Drifters may proliferate in a fractured post-war society, filling voids left by retiring Pro-Heroes. They could inspire a new generation of solo heroes but struggle with coordination.

Key Examples: Mirko, Gran Torino (retired), Fat Gum (partially, due to his flexible approach).

9. Additional Sectors

Based on MHA’s world and themes, here are speculative hero sectors not explicitly listed but implied or plausible:

a. Retired Heroes

Definition: Heroes who leave active duty due to injury, age, or choice (e.g., All Might, Gran Torino).

Analysis: Retired Heroes retain influence as mentors or symbols but struggle with irrelevance (e.g., All Might’s teaching role). Their experience is invaluable, but physical limitations and public expectations create tension. Corruption is unlikely, but disillusionment (e.g., Yoroi Musha) can lead to abandonment.

Examples: All Might, Gran Torino, Yoroi Musha.

Speculation: Retired Heroes may form advisory councils post-war, guiding reforms or mentoring students like Deku.

b. International Heroes

Definition: Heroes operating outside Japan, often with unique cultural or legal frameworks (e.g., Star and Stripe, Salaam).

Analysis: They expand MHA’s global scope, showing diverse hero systems. Star’s New Order Quirk and Salaam’s cultural motifs highlight regional variations. Their distance from Japan limits impact but offers fresh perspectives. Corruption depends on their home systems (e.g., Star’s idealism vs. HPSC-like control elsewhere).

Examples: Star and Stripe (deceased), Salaam, Cow Lady.

Speculation: International Heroes may lead global alliances to rebuild hero society, with Deku as a liaison.

c. Student Heroes

Definition: Hero trainees at schools like U.A., working toward licenses (e.g., Deku, Bakugo).

Analysis: Students represent the future, blending idealism with inexperience. Their internships and exams (e.g., Provisional License Exam) prepare them for Pro-Hero roles, but real-world crises test their resolve. Corruption is rare but possible under corrupt mentors (e.g., HPSC influence). They drive MHA’s coming-of-age narrative.

Examples: Deku, Bakugo, Shoto, Mirio.

Speculation: Students may redefine heroism, creating hybrid roles blending Pro-Hero and vigilante elements.

d. Underground Heroes

Definition: Low-profile heroes who avoid media, focusing on covert or niche roles (e.g., Aizawa, Snipe).

Analysis: Underground Heroes like Aizawa prioritize efficiency over fame, tackling threats like organized crime. Their secrecy reduces corruption but isolates them from public support. They balance the flashiness of Celebrity Heroes, grounding the narrative.

Examples: Aizawa (Eraser Head), Snipe, Selkie.

Speculation: Underground Heroes may lead covert operations post-war, countering villain resurgence discreetly.

Comparative Analysis

Interconnectivity: Sectors overlap significantly. Pro-Heroes often start as Sidekicks or Students, while Celebrity Heroes can be Pro-Heroes (e.g., Mt. Lady). Drifters like Mirko blur lines with Underground Heroes, and Vigilantes may transition to licensed roles (e.g., Koichi’s potential). Hero Commission Heroes straddle Pro-Hero and Corrupt categories, showing systemic complexity.

Societal Impact: Pro-Heroes and Celebrity Heroes shape public perception, while Regular and Underground Heroes maintain stability. Vigilantes and Drifters challenge norms, and Sidekicks enable scalability. Corrupt and HPSC Heroes expose systemic flaws, driving reform.

Corruption Spectrum: Corrupt Heroes and forcibly corrupt HPSC Heroes are most prone to ethical lapses, followed by Celebrity Heroes. Pro-Heroes and Sidekicks vary by individual, while Regular, Underground, and Drifter Heroes lean altruistic. Vigilantes risk corruption via extremism.

Narrative Themes: Each sector reflects MHA’s exploration of heroism’s cost. Pro-Heroes embody duty, Celebrity Heroes critique fame, and Corrupt Heroes expose failure. Vigilantes and Drifters highlight individuality, while Sidekicks and Students emphasize growth. HPSC Heroes question authority.

Speculative Future

Post-war, MHA’s hero society faces a reckoning. Public distrust, reduced Quirk prevalence (via Eri’s Rewind), and HPSC reform could reshape sectors:

Pro-Heroes may decentralize, with smaller, community-focused agencies replacing mega-agencies.

Regular Heroes could lead grassroots recovery, gaining public favor.

HPSC Heroes may dissolve or reform into transparent roles, with Hawks as a reform advocate.

Celebrity Heroes risk obsolescence unless they adapt (e.g., Mt. Lady’s growth).

Sidekicks may unionize for better recognition, elevating their status.

Corrupt Heroes face exposure, prompting purges or defections.

Vigilantes could legitimize as auxiliary heroes, inspired by Deku’s arc.

Drifters may form loose coalitions, balancing independence with collaboration.

New Sectors: “Restorative Heroes” (using Quirks like Eri’s for healing/rebuilding) or “Educator Heroes” (mentors like Aizawa shaping future generations) could emerge.

Conclusion

MHA’s hero sectors reflect a complex ecosystem where duty, fame, autonomy, and corruption intersect. Pro-Heroes and Sidekicks uphold structure, while Vigilantes and Drifters challenge it. Celebrity and Corrupt Heroes expose flaws, and HPSC Heroes reveal systemic control. Each sector’s strengths and weaknesses drive the narrative, with Students like Deku poised to redefine heroism. Speculatively, a post-war world may blend these roles, prioritizing community and authenticity over rankings, with new sectors addressing societal healing and education. This analysis underscores MHA’s critique of heroism as both noble and flawed, inviting reflection on what truly makes a hero.